Visual angle as determinant factor for relative distance perception

Psicologica

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 97-104

  Matsushima, Elton H ^a   De Oliveira, Artur P ^b   Ribeiro Filho, Nilton P ^b   Da Silva, José A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 14544282916     PISSN: 02112159     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Biederman, I. (1972). Perceiving real-world scenes. Science, 77(4043), 77-80.
2. Cutting, J.E. & Vishton, P.M. (1995). Perceiving layout and knowing distance: the integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In W. Epstein & S.P. Rogers (Eds.), Perception of Space and Motion, (p. 69-117). New York: Academic Press.
3. Da Silva, J.A. (1985). Scales for perceived egocentric distance in a large open field: comparison of three psychophysical methods. The American Journal of Psychology, 98(1), 119-144.
4. Da Silva, J.A. (1989). Gogel's law and the simulated moon illusion in a large open field. In M. Hershenson (Ed.), The Moon Illusion. : Hillsdale.
5. Foley, J.M., Ribeiro-Filho, N.P., & Da Silva. (2004). Visual perception of extent and the geometry of visual space. Vision Research, 44, 147-156.
6. Haber, R.N. (1985). Toward a theory of the perceived spatial layout of scenes. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 31(3), 282-321.
7. Levin, C.A. & Haber, R.N. (1993). Visual angle as a determinant of perceived interobject distance. Perception & Psychophysics, 54(2), 250-259.
8. Loomis, J.M., Da Silva, J.A., Fujita, N. & Fukusima, S.S. (1992). Visual space perception and visually directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(4), 906-942.
9. Loomis, J.M. & Philbeck, J.W. (1999). Is the anisotropy of perceived 3-D shape invariant across scale? Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 397-402.
10. Loomis, J.M., Philbeck, J.W., & Zahorik, P. (2002). Dissociation between location and shape in visual space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(5), 1202-1212.
11. Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Boston: MIT Press.
12. Matsushima, E.H. (2003). Anisotropia do espaço percebido e paralaxe de movimento: uma análise da orientação espacial (Anisotropy of perceived space and motion parallax: an analysis of spatial orientation). Unpublished doctoral thesis. Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto.
13. Philbeck, J.W. (2000). Visually directed walking to briefly glimpsed targets is not biased toward fixation location. Perception, 29, 259-272.
14. Przeorek, J. (1986). The effect of different viewing distance, viewing levels, viewing perspectives and walking through a natural scene on the perception of the layout of space. Unpublished thesis. University of Illinois, Chicago.
15. Toye, R.C. (1986). The effect of viewing position on the perceived layout of space. Perception & Psychophysics, 40(2), 85-92.
16. Wagner, M. (1985). The metric of visual space. Perception & Psychophysics, 38(6), 483-495.
17. Wallach, H. (1987). Perceiving a stable environment when one moves. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 1-27.