The Solution NMR Structure of Antheraea polyphemus PBP Provides New Insight into Pheromone Recognition by Pheromone-binding Proteins

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 337, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 157-165

  Mohanty, Smita ^a   Zubkov, Sergey ^a   Gronenborn, Angela M ^b  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES   (United States)

Author keywords

Antheraea polyphemus; NMR structure; Olfaction; PBP; Pheromone binding protein

Indexed keywords

BINDING PROTEIN; PHEROMONE; TRYPTOPHAN; ACETIC ACID; DISULFIDE; INSECT PROTEIN; ISOPROTEIN;

ALPHA HELIX; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; DISULFIDE BOND; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; POLYPHENISM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SILKWORM; SMELLING; ANTHERAEA POLYPHENUMS; BINDING AFFINITY; HYDROPHOBICITY; IN VIVO STUDY; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION;

ANTHERAEA POLYPHEMUS; BOMBYX MORI; LEPIDOPTERA; POLYPHEMUS; ANTHERAEA;

EID: 1442348070     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.01.031     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Roelofs W.L. Chemistry of sex attraction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci., USA. 92:1995;44-49.
2. Breer H., Boekhoff I., Tareilus E. Rapid kinetics of second messenger formation in olfactory transduction. Nature. 345:1990;65-68.
3. Vogt R.G., Prestwich G.D., Lerner M.R. Odorant-binding-protein subfamilies associate with distinct classes of olfactory receptor neurons in insects. J. Neurobiol. 22:1991;74-84.
4. Pelosi P., Maida R. Odorant-binding proteins in insects. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. ser. B. 111:1995;503-514.
5. Pophof B. Moth pheromone binding proteins contribute to the excitation of olfactory receptor cells. Naturwissenschaften. 89:2002;515-518.
6. Du G., Prestwich G.D. Protein structure encodes the ligand binding specificity in pheromone binding proteins. Biochemistry. 34:1995;8726-8732.
7. Maïbèche-Coisné M., Sobrio F., Delaunay T., Lettere M., Dubroca J., Jacquin-Joly E., Nagnan-Le Meillour P. Pheromone binding proteins of the moth Mamestra brassicae: specificity of ligand binding. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 27:1997;213-221.
8. Oldham N.J., Krieger J., Breer H., Svatos A. Detection and removal of an artifact fatty acid from the binding site of recombinant Bombyx mori pheromone-binding protein. Chem. Senses. 26:2001;529-531.
9. Campanacci V., Krieger J., Bette S., Sturgis J.N., Lartigue A., Cambillau C., et al. Revisiting the specificity of Mamestra brassicae and Antheraea polyphemus pheromone-binding proteins with a fluorescence binding assay. J. Biol. Chem. 276:2001;20078-20084.
10. Mohl C., Breer H., Krieger J. Species-specific pheromonal compounds induce distinct conformational changes of pheromone binding protein subtypes from Antheraea polyphemus. Invert. Neurosci. 4:2002;165-174.
11. Bette S., Breer H., Krieger J. Probing a pheromone binding protein of the silkmoth Antheraea polyphemus by endogenous tryptophan fluorescence. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 32:2002;241-246.
12. Vogt R.G., Riddiford L.M. Pheromone binding and inactivation by moth antennae. Nature. 293:1981;161-163.
13. Maida R., Krieger J., Gebauer T., Lange U., Ziegelberger G. Three pheromone-binding proteins in olfactory sensilla of the two silkmoth species Antheraea polyphemus and Antheraea pernyi. Eur. J. Biochem. 267:2000;2899-2908.
14. 15N backbone assignments of the pheromone binding protein from the silk moth Antheraea polyphemus (ApolPBP). J. Biomol. NMR. 27:2003;393-394.
15. Prestwich G.D. Bacterial expression and photoaffinity labeling of a pheromone binding protein. Protein Sci. 2:1993;420-428.
16. Lee D., Damberger F.F., Peng G., Horst R., Güntert P., Nikonova L., et al. NMR structure of the unliganded Bombyx mori pheromone-binding protein at physiological pH. FEBS Letters. 531:2002;314-318.
17. Klusák V., Havlas Z., Rulísek L., Vondrásek J., Svatos A. Sexual attraction in the silkworm moth. Nature of binding of bombykol in pheromone binding protein-an ab initio study. Chem. Biol. 10:2003;331-340.
18. Sandler B.H., Nikonova L., Leal W.S., Clardy J. Sexual attraction in the silkworm moth: structure of the pheromone-binding-protein-bombykol complex. Chem. Biol. 7:2000;143-151.
19. Gigant B., Charbonnier J.B., Eshhar Z., Green B.S., Knossow M. X-ray structures of a hydrolytic antibody and of complexes elucidate catalytic pathway from substrate binding and transition state stabilization through water attack and product release. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 94:1997;7857-7861.
20. Blüml K., Mutschler E., Wess J. Functional role in ligand binding and receptor activation of an asparagine residue present in the sixth transmembrane domain of all muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 29:1994;18870-18876.
21. 1 muscarinic receptors. Br. J. Pharmacol. 126:1999;735-745.
22. Nishio M., Umezawa Y., Hirota M., Takeuchi Y. The CH/π interaction: significance in molecular recognition. Tetrahedron. 51:1995;8665-8701.
23. Vuillard L., Rabilloud T., Goldberg M.E. Interactions of non-detergent sulfobetaines with early folding intermediates facilitate in vitro protein renaturation. Eur. J. Biochem. 256:1998;128-135.
24. 2. EMBO J. 16:1997;651-658.
25. Clore G.M., Gronenborn A.M. Theory and applications of the transferred nuclear Overhauser effect to the study of conformations of small ligands bound to proteins. J. Magn. Reson. 48:1982;402-417.
26. Ferentz A., Wagner G. NMR spectroscopy: a multifaceted approach to macromolecular structure. Quart. Rev. Biophys. 33:2000;29-65.
27. Delaglio F., Grzesiek S., Vuister G.W., Zhu G., Pfifer J., Bax A. NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J. Biomol. NMR. 6:1995;277-293.
28. Johnson B.A., Blevins R.A. NMRView: a computer program for the visualization and analysis of NMR data. J. Biomol. NMR. 4:1994;603-614.
29. 13C chemical-shift data. J. Biomol. NMR. 4:1994;171-180.
30. Hung L.H., Samudrala R. Accurate and automated classification of protein secondary structure with PsiCSI. Protein Sci. 12:2003;288-295.
31. Herrmann T., Güntert P., Wüthrich K. Protein NMR structure determination with automated NOE assignment using the new software CANDID and the torsion angle dynamics algorithm DYANA. J. Mol. Biol. 319:2002;209-227.
32. Cornilescu G., Delaglio F., Bax A. Protein backbone angle restraints from searching a database for chemical shift and sequence homology. J. Biomol. NMR. 13:1999;289-302.
33. Linge J.P., Habeck M., Rieping W., Nilges M. ARIA: automated NOE assignment and NMR structure calculation. Bioinformatics. 19:2003;315-316.
34. Güntert P., Mumenthaler C., Wüthrich K. Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the new program DYANA. J. Mol. Biol. 273:1997;283-298.
35. Linge J.P., Williams M.A., Spronk C.A., Bonvin A.M., Nilges M. Refinement of protein structures in explicit solvent. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 50:2003;496-506.
36. Koradi R., Billeter M., Wüthrich K. MOLMOL: a program for display and analysis of macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Graph. 14:1996;51-55.
37. Laskowski R.A., MacArthur M.W., Moss D.S., Thornton J.M. PROCHECK-a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallog. 26:1993;283-291.
38. Kleywegt G.J., Jones T.A. Detection, delineation, measurement and display of cavities in macromolecular structures. Acta Crystallog. sect. D. 50:1994;178-185.
39. Carson M. RIBBONS. Methods Enzymol. 277:1997;493-505.