Why Mathematics Textbooks Matter

Educational Leadership

Volumn 61, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 61-66

  Reys, Barbara J ^a   Reys, Robert E ^a   Chávez, Oscar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1442330836     PISSN: 00131784     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is - or might be the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6-8, 14.
2. Blank, R. K., Earle, J., Schmidt, W., Roseman, J. E., & Nohara, D. (1997). TIMSS: Guidebook to examine school curricula. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
3. Chávez, O. (2003). From the textbook to the enacted curriculum: Textbook use in the middle school mathematics classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri-Columbia.
4. Education Market Research. (2002, October). K-12 market size and growth rates. Available: www.ed-market.com/r_c_archives/display_article.php?article_id=46
5. Kulm, G. (1999). Making sure that your mathematics curriculum meets standards. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 4(8), 536-541.
6. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM]. (1981). How to evaluate your mathematics program. Reston, VA: Author.
7. NCTM. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
8. NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
9. NCTM & ASCD. (1991). A guide for reviewing school mathematics programs. Reston, VA: NCTM.
10. Reys, B. J., Reys, R. E., Barnes, D., Beem, J., & Papick, I. (1997). Collaborative curriculum investigation as a vehicle for teacher enhancement and mathematics curriculum reform. School Science and Mathematics, 97(5), 253-259.
11. Reys, B. J., Robinson, E., Sconiers, S., & Mark, J. (1999). Mathematics curricula based on rigorous national standards: What, why, and how? Phi Delta Kappan, 80(6), 454-456.
12. Reys, R. E., Reys, B. J., Lapan, R., Holliday, G., & Wasman, D. (2003). Assessing the impact of standards-based middle grades mathematics curriculum materials on student achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34, 74-95.
13. Riordan, J. E., & Noyce, P. E. (2001). The impact of two standards-based mathematics curricula on student achievement in Massachusetts. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 368-398.
14. Robitaille, D. F., & Travers, K. J. (1992). International studies of achievement in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research in mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 687-709). New York: Macmillan.
15. Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., & Raizen, S. A. (1997). A splintered vision: An investigation of U.S. science and mathematics education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
16. Schmidt, W. H., & Valverde, G. (1997). Policy lessons from TIMSS. Paper prepared for the National Governors Association.
17. Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap. New York: The Free Press.
18. Trafton, P., Reys, B. J., & Wasman, D. (2001). Standards-based mathematics curriculum materials: A phrase in search of a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 259-264.
19. Tyson-Bernstein, H., & Woodward, A. (1991). Nineteenth century policies for twenty-first century practice: The textbook reform dilemma. In Textbooks in American Society (pp. 91-104). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
20. Weiss, I. R., Banilower, E. R., McMahon, K. C., & Smith, P. S. (2001). Report of the 2000 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc. Available: http://2000survey.horizon-research.com/reports/status.php