Perception of Symmetry in the Face

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 128-134

  Huisinga Fischer, Clara E ^a   Souren, Jim P H J A ^a   Werken, Frederik V D ^a   Prahl Andersen, Birte ^a   van Ginkel, Floris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

(A)symmetry; Hemifacial microsomia; Need for treatment; Ratio estimation scale technique

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ART; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CHILD; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; DENTIST; FACE ASYMMETRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHILD; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; DENTISTS; FACIAL ASYMMETRY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERCEPTION; PHOTOGRAPHY, DENTAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SCULPTURE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 1442308707     PISSN: 10492275     EISSN: 15363732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001665-200401000-00033     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Gilbert C, Bakan P. Visual asymmetry in perception of faces. Neuropsychologia. 1973; 11:355-362.
2. Ekman, P. Facial signs: Facts, fantasies, and possibilities. In: Sebeok T, ed. Sight, Sound and Sense. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1978:24-156.
3. Bruyer R, Craps V. Facial asymmetry: perceptual awareness and lateral differences. Can J Psychiatry. 1985; 39:54-69.
4. Moss JP, Coombes AM, Linney AD, et al. Methods of three-dimensional analysis of patients with asymmetry of the face. Proc Finn Dent Soc. 1991; 87:139-149.
5. Livshits G, Kobyliansky E. Fluctuating asymmetry as a possible measure of developmental homeostasis in humans: a review. Hum Biol. 1991; 63:441-466.
6. Gangestad SW, Thornhill R, Yeo RA. Facial attractiveness, developmental stability, and fluctuating asymmetry. Ethnol Sociobiol. 1994; 15:73-85.
7. Piedra I. The Levandosky panoramic analysis of facial and dental asymmetries. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1995; 20:15-21.
8. Kowner R. Facial asymmetry and attractiveness judgment in developmental perspective. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996; 22:662-675.
9. Macgregor FC. Social and Psychological Implications of Dentofacial Disfigurement. Angle Orthodont. 1970; 40:231-233.
10. Macgregor FC. Some Psychosocial problems associated with facial deformities. New York: New York University College of Medicine, 1970:629-638.
11. Shaw WC. The influence of children’s dento-facial appearance on their social attractiveness as judged by peers and lay adults. Am J Orthodont. 1981; 79:399-415.
12. Shaw WC, Rees G, Dawe M, et al. The influence of dento-facial appearance on the social attractiveness of young adults. Am J Orthodont. 1985; 87:21-26.
13. Prahl-Andersen B. A mixed-longitudinal interdisciplinary study of growth and development. Nijmegen: Department of Orthodontics, Catholic University, 1979.
14. Peerlings RHJ. Orthodontics and dento-facial esthetics [thesis]. Nijmegen: Department of Orthodontics, Catholic University, 1992.
15. Horst A, Roos MR. De constructie van twee schalen voor beoordelen van het uiterlijk van kinderen met schisis, voor en na lipsluiting. Amsterdam: Department of Orthodontics, Vrije University, 1988.
16. Tedesco LA, Albino JE, Cunat JJ, et al. A dental facial attractiveness scale: part I. Reliability and validity. Am J Orthodont. 1983; 83:38-44.
17. Tedesco LA, Albino JE, Cunat JJ, et al. A dental facial attractiveness scale: part II. Consistency of perception. Am J Orthodont. 1983; 83:44-46.
18. Saris WE, Doorn L, Neijens P. De meting van beroepsstatus met behulp van psychofysische schaaltechnieken. Mens en Maatschappij. 1981; 56:378-397.
19. Saris WE, Doorn L, Neijens P. Scaling social variables by multimodality matching. Paper presented at: the 1980 European Meeting of the Psychometric Society; 1980; Groningen, The Netherlands.
20. Poswillo D. The pathogenesis of the first and second branchial arch syndrome. Oral Surg. 1973; 35:302-328.
21. Grabb WC. The first and second brachial arch syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1965; 36:485-506.
22. Gibbon DB, Evans CA, Bernier DL, et al. Comparison of two computer-animated imaging programs for quantifying facial profile preference. Percept Mot Skills. 1996; 82:1251-1264.
23. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977; 33:159-174.
24. Fischer CE, Souren JPHJA, Werken van de FSB, et al. Perceptie van symmetrie van het aangezicht. Indicatiestelling voor behandeling van hemifaciale microsomie. Tandheelkundig jaar. Houten: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum, 1999:76-89.
25. Donabedian A. Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring. The Definition of Quality and Approaches to its Assessment. Vol 1. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press, 1980.