Towards understanding fairness judgments associated with computer performance monitoring: An integration of the feedback, justice, and monitoring research

Human Resource Management Review

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 43-67

  Alder, G Stoney ^a   Ambrose, Maureen L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Justice; Monitoring; Performance feedback

Indexed keywords

EID: 14244258232     PISSN: 10534822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2005.01.001     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. J.R. Aiello Computer-based work monitoring: Electronic surveillance and its effects Journal of Applied Social Psychology 23 1993 499-507
2. Aiello J.R. & Shao Y. 1992 Effects of computer monitoring on task performance. Paper presented as part of "Computerized Performance Monitoring: Its impact on employees, supervisors, and organizations" (John R. Aiello, Chair), A symposium at the seventh annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology
3. G.S. Alder Ethical issues in electronic performance monitoring: A consideration of deontological and teleological perspectives Journal of Business Ethics 17 7 1998 729-743
4. G.S. Alder P.K. Tompkins Electronic performance monitoring: An organizational justice and concertive control perspective Management Communication Quarterly 10 1997 259-288
5. B.J. Alge The effects of computer surveillance on perceptions of privacy and procedural fairness Journal of Applied Psychology 86 2001 797-804
6. M.L. Ambrose G.S. Alder Designing, implementing, and utilizing computerized performance monitoring: Enhancing organizational justice Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management 18 2000 187-219
7. A. Bandura Social cognitive theory of self regulation Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 1991 248-287
8. A. Bandura D. Cervone Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45 1983 1017-1028
9. R.A. Baron Negative effects of destructive criticism: Impact on conflict, self-efficacy, and task performance Journal of Applied Psychology 73 1988 199-207
10. R.A. Baron Countering the effects of destructive criticism: The relative efficacy of four potential interventions Journal of Applied Psychology 75 1990 235-245
11. R.A. Baron Criticism (informal negative feedback) as a source of perceived unfairness in organizations: Effects, mechanisms, and countermeasures In R. Cropanzano (Ed.) Justice in the workplace 1993 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale, NJ 150-170
12. R. Bies D. Shapiro Voice and justification: Their influence on procedural fairness judgments Academy of Management Journal 31 1988 676-685
13. R.J. Bies J.S. Moag Interactional justice: Communicative criteria of fairness In R.J. Lewicki B.H. Sheppard & B.H. Bozeman (Eds.) Research on negotiation in organizations vol. 1 1986 JAI Press Greenwich, CT 43-55
14. J. Brockner J. Greenberg The impact of layoffs on survivors: An organizational justice perspective In J.S. Carroll (Ed.) Applied social psychology and organizational settings 1990 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale, NJ 45-75
15. R. Butler Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation: Effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest, and performance Journal of Educational Psychology 79 1987 474-482
16. P. Carayon Effects of electronic performance monitoring on job design and worker stress: Review of the literature and conceptual model Human Factors 35 1993 385-395
17. D. Cederblom J.W. Lounsbury An investigation of user acceptance of peer evaluations Personnel Psychology 33 1980 567-579
18. J. Chalykoff T.A. Kochan Computer-aided monitoring: Its influence on employee job satisfaction and turnover Personnel Psychology 42 1989 807-834
19. J.S. Chhokar J.A. Wallin A field study of the effect of feedback frequency on performance Journal of Applied Psychology 69 1984 524-530
20. Y. Cohen-Charash P.E. Spector The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 86 2001 278-321
21. J.A. Colquitt On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure Journal of Applied Psychology 86 2001 386-400
22. J.A. Colquitt D.E. Conlon M.J. Wesson C. Porter K. Yee Ng Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research Journal of Applied Psychology 86 2001 425-445
23. R. Cropanzano M.L. Ambrose Procedural and distributive justice are more similar than you think: A monistic perspective and a research agenda In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.) Advances in organizational justice 2001 Stanford University Press Stanford, CA 119-151
24. R. Cropanzano J. Greenberg Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze In I.T. Robertson & C.L. Cooper (Eds.) International review of industrial and organizational psychology vol. 12 1997 Wiley New York 317-372
25. R. Cropanzano D.E. Rupp C.J. Mohler M. Schminke Three roads to organizational justice In G.R. Ferris (Ed.) Research in personnel and human resources management vol. 20 2001 1-113
26. L.P. Cusella The effects of source expertise and feedback valence on intrinsic motivation Human Communication Research 9 1982 17-32
27. L.P. Cusella Feedback motivation and performance In F.M. Jablin L.L. Putnam K.H. Roberts & L.W. Porter (Eds.) Handbook of organizational communication 1987 Sage Newbury Park, CA 624-678
28. G.P. Daft R.H. Lengel Information richness: A new approach to managerial information processing and organizational design In B. Staw & L.L. Cummings (Eds.) Research in organizational behavior vol. 5 1984 JAI Press Greenwich, CT 191-233
29. G.P. Daft R.H. Lengel Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design Management Science 32 1986 554-571
30. K.B. DeTienne N.T. Abbott Developing an employee centered electronic monitoring system Journal of Systems Management 44 1993 12-15
31. D. DiTecco G. Cwitco A. Arsenault M. Andre Operating stress and monitoring practices Applied Ergonomics 23 1992 29-34
32. P.C. Earley Computer generated performance feedback in the magazine subscription industry Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 41 1988 50-64
33. E.S. Elliott C.S. Dweck Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54 1988 5-12
34. D.B. Fedor Recipient responses to performance feedback: A proposed model and its implications Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management 9 1991 73-120
35. R. Folger R.J. Bies Managerial responsibilities and procedural justice Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 2 1989 79-89
36. R. Folger R. Cropanzano Organizational justice and human resource management 1998 Sage Thousand Oaks, CA
37. Y. Fried G.R. Ferris The validity of the job characteristics model: A review and meta-analysis Personnel Psychology 40 1987 287-322
38. R. Grant C. Higgins Monitoring service workers via computer: The effect on employees, productivity, and service National Productivity Review 8 1989 101-112
39. J. Greenberg Using diaries to promote procedural justice in performance appraisals Social Justice Research 1 1987 219-234
40. J. Greenberg Looking fair vs. being fair: Managing impressions of organizational justice In B.M. Staw & L.L. Cummings (Eds.) Research in organizational behavior vol. 12 1990 JAI Press Greenwich, CT 111-157
41. J. Greenberg Stealing in the name of justice: Informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 54 1993 81-103
42. J. Greenberg Using socially fair treatment to promote acceptance of a work site smoking ban Journal of Applied Psychology 79 1994 288-297
43. J.R. Hackman G.R. Oldham Work redesign 1980 Addison-Wesley Philippines
44. V.E. Henriques In defense of computer monitoring Training 23 1986 120
45. G.P. Huber R.L. Daft The information environments of organizations In F.M. Jablin L.L. Putnam K.H. Robertsand & L.W. Porter (Eds.) Handbook of organizational communication 1987 Sage Newbury Park, CA 130-164
46. L.C. Idson E.T. Higgins How current feedback and chronic effectiveness influence motivation: Everything to gain versus everything to lose European Journal of Social Psychology 30 2000 583-592
47. D.R. Ilgen C.D. Fisher M.S. Taylor Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations Journal of Applied Psychology 64 1979 349-371
48. R.E. Kidwell Jr. N. Bennett Employee reactions to electronic control systems: The role of procedural fairness Group & Organization Management 19 1994 203-218
49. A.N. Kluger N.A. Adler Person versus computer-mediated feedback Computers in Human Behavior 9 1993 1-16
50. A.N. Kluger A. DeNisi The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory Psychological Bulletin 119 1996 254-284
51. J.L. Komaki Toward effective supervision: An operant analysis and comparison of managers at work Journal of Applied Psychology 71 1986 270-279
52. M. Konovsky R. Cropanzano Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor employee attitudes and job performance Journal of Applied Psychology 76 1991 698-707
53. M.A. Konovsky Understanding procedural justice and its impact on business organizations Journal of Management 26 2000 489-512
54. M.A. Konovsky R. Cropanzano Justice considerations in employee drug testing In R. Cropanzano (Ed.) Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management 1993 Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ 171-192
55. G.S. Leventhal What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships In K.J. Gergen M.S. Greenberg & R.H. Willis (Eds.) Social exchange: Advances in theory and research 1980 Plenum Press New York 27-55
56. E.A. Lind Justice and authority relations in organizations In R. Cropanzano & M.K. Kacmar (Eds.) Organizational politics, justice, and support: Managing the social climate of the workplace 1995 Quorum Books Westport, CT 83-96
57. E.A. Lind Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.) Advances in organizational justice 2001 Stanford University Press Stanford, CA 56-88
58. E.A. Lind R. Kanfer P. Early Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and non-instrumental concerns in fairness judgments Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59 1990 952-959
59. E.A. Lind S. Kurtz L. Musante L. Walker J. Thibaut Procedure and outcome effects on reactions to adjudicated resolutions of conflicts of interest Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 1980 643-653
60. E.A. Lind T.R. Tyler The social psychology of procedural justice 1988 Plenum New York
61. E.A. Locke G.P. Latham A theory of goal setting and task performance 1990 Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ
62. C.O. Longnecker H.P. Sims D.A. Gioia Behind the mask: The politics of employee appraisal Academy of Management Executive 1 1987 183-193
63. R.H. Moorman D.L. Wells Can electronic monitoring be fair? Exploring the relationships among monitoring characteristics, perceived fairness, and job performance Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 10 2003 2-16
64. D.M. Nebeker C.B. Tatum The effects of computer monitoring, standards, and rewards on work performance, job satisfaction, and stress Journal of Applied Social Psychology 23 1993 508-536
65. Niehoff B.P. & Moorman R.H. 1996 The influence of job type and position tenure on performance monitoring and workplace justice: An application of agency theory to supervisor-subordinate relationships Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Academy of Management, Boston, MA
66. G.B. Northcraft S.J. Ashford The preservation of self in every day life: The effects of performance expectations and feedback context on feedback inquiry Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 47 1990 42-65
67. K. Nussbaum V. duRivage Computer monitoring: Mismanagement by remote control Business and Society Review 56 1986 16-20
68. D.J. O'Keefe Persuasion 1990 Sage Newbury Park, CA
69. C. O'Reilly J. Anderson Trust and the communication of performance appraisal information: The effects of feedback on performance and job satisfaction Human Communication Research 6 1980 290-298
70. D.W. Organ R.H. Moorman Fairness and organizational citizenship behavior: What are the connections? Social Justice Research 6 1993 5-18
71. P.M. Podsakoff J.H. Farh Effects of feedback sign and credibility on goal setting and task performance Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 44 1989 45-67
72. R.W. Renn K.O. Prien Employee response to performance feedback from the task: A field study of the moderating effects of global self-esteem Group & Organization Management 20 1995 337-354
73. R.B. Shaw Trust in the balance: Building successful organizations on results, integrity, and concern 1997 Jossey-Bass San Francisco
74. J. Siegel V. Dubrovsky S. Keisler T.W. McGuire Group processes in computer-mediated communication Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 37 1986 157-187
75. M.J. Smith P. Carayon K.J. Sanders D. LeGrande Employee stress and health complaints in jobs with and without electronic performance monitoring Applied Ergonomics 1992 23
76. J.M. Stanton Reactions to employee performance monitoring: Framework, review, and research directions Human Performance 13 2000 85-113
77. J.M. Stanton Traditional and electronic monitoring from and organizational justice perspective Journal of Business and Psychology 15 2000 129-147
78. J.M. Stanton J.L. Barnes-Farrell Effects of electronic performance monitoring on personal control, task satisfaction, and task performance Journal of Applied Psychology 81 1996 738-745
79. M.S. Taylor C.D. Fisher D.R. Ilgen Individuals reactions to performance feedback in organizations: A control theory perspective In K.M. Rowland & G.R. Ferris (Eds.) Research in personnel and human resources management 1984 JAI Press Greenwich, CT 81-124
80. J. Thibaut L. Walker Procedural justice: A psychological analysis 1975 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale, NJ
81. P.K. Tompkins G. Cheney Communication and unobtrusive control in contemporary organizations In R. McPhee & P. Tompkins (Eds.) Organizational communication: Traditional themes and new directions 1985 Sage Beverly Hills
82. T.R. Tyler The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57 1989 830-838
83. T.R. Tyler Why people cooperate with organizations: An identity-based perspective In R.I. Sutton & B.M. Staw (Eds.) Research in organizational behavior vol. 21 1999 JAI Press Stamford, CT 201-246
84. T.R. Tyler R.J. Bies Beyond formal procedures: The interpersonal context of procedural justice In J.S. Carroll (Ed.) Applied social psychology and organizational settings 1990 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale, NJ 77-98
85. T.R. Tyler S.L. Blader Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity and behavioral engagement 2000 Psychology Press Philadelphia
86. T.R. Tyler S.L. Blader Identity and cooperative behavior in groups Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 3 2001 207-226
87. T.R. Tyler P. Degoey Trust in organizational authorities: The influence of motive attributions on willingness to accept decisions In R.M. Kramer & T.R. Tyler (Eds.) Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research 1996 Sage Thousand Oaks, CA 331-356
88. T.R. Tyler E.A. Lind A relational model of authority in groups Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 25 1992 115-191
89. US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment The electronic supervisor: New technology, new tensions 1987 U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, DC OTA-CIT-333
90. J.B. Vancouver E.W. Morrison Feedback inquiry: The effect of source attributes and individual differences Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 62 1995 276-285
91. E. Williams Teleconferencing: Social and psychological factors Journal of Communication 28 3 1978 125-131