Computer-based detection and prompting of mammographic abnormalities

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 77, Issue SPEC. ISS. 2, 2004, Pages

  Astley, S M ^a  

^a Dept of Imaging Sci/Biomed Eng ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANALYTICAL ERROR; BREAST CALCIFICATION; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER SYSTEM; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING SYSTEM; MAMMOGRAPHY; REVIEW; SCREENING TEST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ALGORITHMS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EVALUATION STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 14044253539     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/30116822     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Elmore JG, Miglioretti DL, Carney PA. Does practice make perfect when interpreting mammography? Part II. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:250-2.
2. Astley SM, Boggis CRM, Walker K, Wallace S, Tomkinson S, Hillier V, et al. An evaluation of a commercial prompting system in a busy screening centre. In: Peitgen H-O, editor. Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Digital Mammography 2002, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 2002;471-5.
3. Huynh PT, Jarolimek AM, Daye S. The false negative mammogram. RadioGraphics 1998;18:1137-54.
4. Britton PD, McCann J, O'Driscoll D, Hunnam G, Warren RML. Interval cancer peer review in East Anglia: implications for monitoring doctors as well as the NHS Breast Screening Programme. Clin Radiol Vol 2000;56:44-9.
5. Blanks RG, Wallis MG, Moss SM. A comparison of cancer detection rates achieved by breast cancer screening programmes by number of readers, for one and two view mammography: results from the UK National Health Service breast screening Programme. J Med Screening 1998;5: 195-201.
6. Dinnes J, Moss S, Melia J, Blanks R, Song F, Kleijnen J. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of double reading of mammograms in breast cancer screening: findings of a systematic review. The Breast 2001;10:455-63.
7. Tarassenko L, Hayton P, Cerneaz N, Brady M. Novelty detection for the identification of masses in mammograms. Proc 4th International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, Cambridge, UK. 1995;442-7.
8. Hoare SW, Asbridge D, Beatty PCW. On-line novelty detection for artefact identification in automatic anaesthesia record keeping. Med Engineering Phys 2002;24:673-81.
9. Rose C, Taylor CJ. A statistical model of texture for medical image synthesis and analysis. In: Proc. Medical Image Understanding and Analysis. 2003:1-4.
10. Poissonier M, Brady JM. Noise equalization, film screen artifacts and density representation. In: Yaffe MJ, editor. Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Digital Mammography. Wisconsin: Medical Physics Publishing 2001:605-11.
11. Rick A, Muller S, Bothorol S, Grimaud M. Quantitative modeling of microcalcification detection in digital mammography. In: Proceedings of Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. 1999:32-41.
12. Hagihara Y, Kobatake H, Nawano S, Takeo H. Accurate detection of microcalcifications on mammograms by improvement of morphological processing. In: Yaffe MJ, editor. Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Digital Mammography. Wisconsin: Medical Physics Publishing, 2001:193-7.
13. Chan H-P, Doi K, Galhotra S, Vyborny C, MacMahon H, Jokich P. Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital mammography. (I) Automated detection of microcalcifications in mammography. Med Physics 1987;14:538-48.
14. Gurcan MN, Chan H-P, Sahmer B, Hadjiiski L, Petrick N, Helvie MA. Optimal neural network architecture selection: improvements in the computerized detection of microcalcifications. Academic Radiology 2002;9:420-9.
15. Zhang X, Hara T, Fujita H, Shinohara N, Ooe Y, Iwase T, et al. Artificial neural network method for detecting clustered microcalcifications in masses on mammograms. In: Peitgen H-O, editor. Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Digital Mammography. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 2002:391-3.
16. Karssemeijer N. Adaptive noise equalization and recognition of microcalcification clusters in mammograms. Int J Pattern Recogn Artificial Intell 1993;7:1357-76.
17. Suckling J, Astley S, Betal D, Cerneaz N, Dance DR, Kok S-L, et al. The mammographic image analysis society digital mammogram, database. Exerpta Medica. International Congress Series 1994;1069:375-8.
18. Heath M, Bowyer K, Kopans D, Moore R, Kegelmeyer P. The digital database for screening mammography. In: Yaffe MS, editor. Digital Mammography. Toronto, Canada: Medical Physics Publishing, 2001;457-60.
19. Alberdi E, Taylor P, Lee R, Fox J, Sordo M, Todd-Pokropek A. CADMIUM II: Acquisition and representation of radiological knowledge for computerized decision support in mammography. Proc AMIA Annual Symposium. 2000: 7-11.
20. Kahn CE Jr, Roberts LM, Shaffer KA, Haddawy P. Construction of a Bayesian network for mammographic diagnosis of breast cancer. Computers Med Biol 1997;27: 19-29.
21. Niklason LT, Christian BT, Niklason LE, Kopans DB, Castleberry DE, Opsahl-Ong BH, et al. Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology 1997;205:399-406.
22. Karssemeijer N, te Brake G. Detection of stellate distortions in mammograms. IEEE Trans Medical Imaging 1996;15: 611-9.
23. Zwiggelaar R, Parr T, Schumm J, Hutt I, Astley SM, Taylor CJ, et al. Model-based detection of spiculated lesions in mammograms. Medical Image Analysis 1999;3: 39-62.
24. Matsubara T, Ichikawa T, Hara T, Fujita H, Kasai S, Endo T, et al. Automated detection methods for architectural distortions around skinline and within mammary gland on mammograms. Computer-Assisted Radiology and Surgery: Proceedings of the 17th International Congress London, 2003;950-5.
25. Miller P, Astley S. Classification of breast tissue by texture analysis. Image and Vision Computing 1993;10:277-82.
26. Suckling J, Dance DR, Moskovic E, Lewis DJ, Blacker SG. Segmentation of mammograms using multiple linked self-organizing neural networks. Med Phys 1995;22:145-52.
27. Marias K, Highnam R, Brady M, Parbhoo S, Seifalian A. Assessing the role of quantitative analysis of mammograms in describing breast density changes in women with HRT. In: Peitgen H-O, editor. Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Digital Mammography. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 2002:547-51.
28. R2 ImageChecker (accessed 12.08.03) http://www.r2tech.com
29. iCAD MammoRead (accessed 12.08.03) http://www.imaging.com/mammo/issi.htm
30. CADx Second Look (accessed 12.08.03) http://www.icadmed.com
31. Caulkin S, Astley SM, Asquith J, Boggis C. Sites of occurrence of malignancies in mammograms. In: Karssemeijer N, Thijssen M, Hendriks J, van Erning L, editors, Digital Mammography, Kluwer Academic, Nijmegen, 1998.
32. Wirth MA, Narhan J, Gray D. Nonrigid mammogram registration using mutual information. In: Sonka M, Fitzpatrick JM, editors. Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging: Image Processing. 2002;4684:562-73.
33. Rueckert D, Sonoda LI, Hayes C, Hill DLG, Leach MO, Hawkes DJ. Non-rigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 1999;19:94-102.
34. Yin FF, Giger ML, Doi K, Vyborny CJ, Schmidt RA. Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: automated alignment of breast images and its effect on bilateral-subtraction technique. Med Phys 1994;21:445-52.
35. Miller P, Astley SM. Automated detection of asymmetry in digitised mammograms. Int J Pattern Recogn Artificial Intell 1993;7:1461-76.
36. Astley S, Mistry T, Boggis C, Hillier V. Should we use humans or a machine to pre-screen mammograms? In: Peitgen H-O, editor. Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Digital Mammography. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 2002:476-80.
37. Computer-Aided Detection in Mammography: Working party of the Radiologists Quality Assurance Co-ordinating Group, NHSBSP Publications No 48, Jan 2001.
38. Gale AG, Savage CJ, Pawley EF, Wilson ARM, Roebuck EJ. Breast screening: visual search and observer performance. In: Kundel HL, editor. Image perception, Proc SPIE 1994;2166:66-75.
39. Blanks RG, Wallis MG, Given-Wilson R. Observer variability in cancer detection during routine repeat incident mammographic screening in a study of two versus one view mammography. J Med Screen 1999;6:152-8.
40. Warren Burhenne LJ, Wood SA, D-Orsi CJ, Feig SA, Kopans DB, O'Shaughnessy KE, et al. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 2000;215:554-62.
41. Champness J, Taylor P, Given-Wilsori R. Impact of computer-placed prompts on sensitivity and specificity with different groups of mammographic film readers. In: Peitgen H-O, editor. Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Digital Mammography. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 2002:276-80.
42. Taylor PM, Champness J, Given-Wilson R, Potts HW, Johnston K. An evaluation of the impact of computer-based prompts on screen readers' interpretation of mammograms. Br J Radiol 2004;77:21-7.
43. Freer TW, Ulissey MJ. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 2001;220:781-6.
44. Garvican L, Field S. A pilot evaluation of the R2 Image Checker System, Users' Response in the Detection of Interval Breast Cancers on Previous Screening Films. Clin Radiol 2001;56:833-7.
45. Thurfjell E, Thurfjell MG, Egge E, Bjurstam N. Sensitivity and specificity of computer-assisted breast cancer detection in mammography screening. Acta Radiologica 1998;39:384-8.
46. Karssemeijer N, Otten JDM, Verbeek ALM, Groenewoud JH, de Koning HJ, Hendriks JHC, et al. Computer-aided detection versus independent double reading of masses on mammograms. Radiology 2003;227:192-200.
47. Board M, Astley S. A new method for evaluating and optimising mammographic detection algorithms. In: Peitgen H-O, editor. Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Digital Mammography. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 2002:257-61.