Demographic and evolutionary impacts of native and invasive insect herbivores on Cirsium canescens

Ecology

Volumn 86, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 453-465

  Rose, Karen E ^a,b   Louda, Svata M ^c   Rees, Mark ^a,b  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA   (United States)

Author keywords

Biological control; Cirsium canescens; Evolutionary stable strategy; Insect herbivore; Integral projection model; Invasive species; Life history evolution; Monocarpic perennial; Platte thistle; Rhinocyllus conicus; Selection

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; DEMOGRAPHY; INTRODUCED SPECIES; LIFE HISTORY; NATIVE SPECIES; NATURAL SELECTION; PLANT-HERBIVORE INTERACTION; POPULATION DECLINE;

NORTH AMERICA; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

CIRSIUM; CIRSIUM CANESCENS; HEXAPODA; INSECTA; RHINOCYLLUS; RHINOCYLLUS CONICUS;

EID: 13944280185     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/03-0697     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Arnold, S. J., and M. J. Wade. 1984a. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory. Evolution 38:709-719.
2. Arnold, S. J., and M. J. Wade. 1984b. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: applications. Evolution 38: 720-734.
3. Blanckenhorn, W. U. 2000. The evolution of body size: what keeps organisms small? Quarterly Review of Biology 75: 385-407.
4. Bleed, A., and C. Flowerday, editors. 1989. An atlas of the Sand Hills. Conservation and Survey Division, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.
5. Bullock, J. M., B. C. Hill, and J. Silvertown. 1994. Demography of Cirsium vulgare in a grazing experiment. Journal of Ecology 82:101-111.
6. Carroll, S. P., and H. Dingle. 1996. The biology of post-invasion events. Biological Conservation 78:207-214.
7. Carroll, S. P., H. Dingle, and S. P. Klassen. 1997. Genetic differentiation of fitness-associated traits among rapidly evolving populations of the soapberry bug. Evolution 51: 1182-1188.
8. Caswell, H. 2001. Matrix population models: construction, analysis and interpretation. Second edition. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
9. Charlesworth, B. 1994. Evolution in age-structured populations. Second edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
10. Childs, D. Z., M. Rees, K. E. Rose, and P. J. Grubb. 2003. Evolution of complex flowering strategies: an age and stage-structured integral projection model approach. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 270:1829-1838.
11. Childs, D. Z., M. Rees, K. E. Rose, P. J. Grubb, and S. P. Ellner. 2004. Evolution of size-dependent flowering in a variable environment: construction and analysis of a stochastic integral projection model. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 271:425-434.
12. Cochran, M. E., and S. Ellner. 1992. Simple methods for calculating age-based life history parameters for stage-structured populations. Ecological Monographs 62:345-364.
13. Crawley, M. J. 1983. Herbivory. The dynamics of animal-plant interactions. Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
14. de Jong, T. J., P. G. L. Klinkhamer, and J. A. J. Metz. 1987. Selection for biennial life histories in plants. Vegetatio 70: 149-156.
15. Doak, D. F. 1992. Lifetime impacts of herbivory for a perennial plant. Ecology 73:2086-2099.
16. Easterling, M. R., S. P. Ellner, and P. M. Dixon. 2000. Size-specific sensitivity: applying a new structured population model. Ecology 81:694-708.
17. Ehrlen, J. 1995a. Demography of the perennial herb Lathyrus vernus. I. Herbivory and individual plant performance. Journal of Ecology 83:287-295.
18. Ehrlen, J. 1995b. Demography of the perennial herb Lathyrus vernus. II. Herbivory and population dynamics. Journal of Ecology 83:297-308.
19. Gassmann, A., and S. M. Louda. 2001. Rhinocyllus conicus: initial evaluation and subsequent ecological impacts in North America. Pages 147-183 in E. Wajnberg, J. K. Scott, and P. C. Quimby, editors. Evaluating indirect ecological effects of biological control. CABI Science Publishing, Wallingford, UK.
20. Grafen, A. 1988. On the uses of data on lifetime reproductive success. Pages 454-471 in T. H. Clutton-Brock, editor. Reproductive success. Studies of individual variation in contrasting breeding systems. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
21. Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
22. Harrington, H. D. 1954. Manual of the plants of Colorado. Sage Books, Denver, Colorado, USA.
23. Hendrix, S. D. 1988. Herbivory and its impact on plant reproduction. Pages 246-263 in J. L. Doust and L. L. Doust, editors. Plant reproductive ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
24. Janzen, D. H. 1971. Seed predation by animals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 2:465-492.
25. Lamp, W. O. 1980. Pre-dispersal seed predation of the Platte thistle and its effects on seed production. Dissertation. University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.
26. Lamp, W. O., and M. K. McCarty. 1981. Biology and ecology of the Platte thistle (Cirsium canescens). Weed Science 29: 686-692.
27. Lamp, W. O., and M. K. McCarty. 1982. Pre-dispersal seed predation of a native thistle, Cirsium canescens. Environmental Entomology 11:847-851.
28. Lande, R., and S. J. Arnold. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210-1226.
29. Louda, S. M. 1989. Predation in the dynamics of seed regeneration. Pages 25-59 in M. A. Leck, V. T. Parker, and R. L. Simpson, editors. Ecology of seed banks. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.
30. Louda, S. M. 1998. Population growth of Rhinocyllus conicus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on two species of native thistles in prairie. Environmental Entomology 27:834-841.
31. Louda, S. M. 2000. Negative ecological effects of the musk thistle biocontrol agent Rhinocyllus conicus Fröl. Pages 215-243 in P. A. Follett and J. J. Duan, editors. Nontarget effects of biological control. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrect, The Netherlands.
32. Louda, S. M., and A. E. Arnett. 1999. Predicting non-target ecological effects of biological control agents: evidence from Rhinocyllus conicus. Pages 551-567 in N. R. Spencer, editor. Proceedings of the X International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds. Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA.
33. Louda, S. M., A. E. Arnett, T. A. Rand, and F. L. Russell. 2003. Invasiveness of some biological control insects and adequacy of their ecological risk assessment and regulation. Conservation Biology 17:73-82.
34. Louda, S. M., D. Kendall, J. Connor, and D. Simberloff. 1997. Ecological effects of an insect introduced for the biological control of weeds. Science 277:1088-1090.
35. Louda, S. M., and M. A. Potvin. 1995. Effect of inflorescence-feeding insects on the demography and lifetime fitness of a native plant. Ecology 76:229-245.
36. Louda, S. M., M. A. Potvin, and S. K. Collinge. 1990. Predispersal seed predation, postdispersal seed predation and competition in the recruitment of seedlings of a native thistle in Sandhills prairie. American Midland Naturalist 124: 105-113.
37. McCullagh, P., and J. A. Nelder. 1989. Generalized linear models. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
38. Metcalf, J. C., K. E. Rose, and M. Rees. 2003. Evolutionary demography of monocarpic perennials. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:471-480.
39. Mooney, H. A., and E. E. Cleland. 2001. The evolutionary impact of invasive species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 98:5446-5451.
40. Müller-Scharer, H., and T. Steinger. 2004. Predicting evolutionary change in invasive, exotic plants and its consequences for plant-herbivore interactions. Pages 137-162 in L. E. Ehler, R. Sforza, and T. Mateille, editors. Genetics, evolution and biological control. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
41. Mylius, S. D., and O. Diekmann. 1995. On evolutionarily stable life-histories, optimization and the need to be specific about density-dependence. Oikos 74:218-224.
42. Potvin, M. A. 1988. Seed rain on a Nebraska Sandhills prairie. Prairie Naturalist 20:81-89.
43. R Development Core Team. 2004. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Version 1.8.0. R Foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria.
44. Rees, M., D. Z. Childs, K. E. Rose, and P. J. Grubb. 2004. Evolution of size-dependent flowering in a variable environment: partitioning the effects of fluctuating selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 271:471-475.
45. Rees, M., and M. J. Crawley. 1989. Growth, reproduction and population-dynamics. Functional Ecology 3:645-653.
46. Rees, M., M. Mangel, L. A. Turnbull, A. Sheppard, and D. Briese. 2000. The effects of heterogeneity on dispersal and colonisation in plants. Pages 237-265 in M. J. Hutchings, E. A. John, and A. J. A. Stewart, editors. Ecological consequences of environmental heterogeneity. Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
47. Rees, M., and K. E. Rose. 2002. Evolution of flowering strategies in Oenothera glazioviana: an integral projection model approach. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 269:1509-1515.
48. Rees, M., A. Sheppard, D. Briese, and M. Mangel. 1999. Evolution of size-dependent flowering in Onopordum illyricum: a quantitative assessment of the role of stochastic selection pressures. American Naturalist 154:628-651.
49. Rose, K. E., M. Rees, and P. J. Grubb. 2002. Evolution in the real world: stochastic variation and the determinants of fitness in Carlina vulgaris. Evolution 56:1416-1430.
50. Russell, F. L., and S. M. Louda. 2004. Phenological synchrony affects interaction strength of an exotic weevil with Platte thistle, a native host plant. Oecologia 139:525-534.
51. Sakai, A. K., et al. 2001. The population biology of invasive species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32: 305-332.
52. Singer, M. C., C. D. Thomas, and C. Parmesan. 1993. Rapid human-induced evolution of insect host associations. Nature 366:681-683.
53. Sletvold, N. 2002. Effects of plant size on reproductive output and offspring performance in the facultative biennial Digitalis purpurea. Journal of Ecology 90:958-966.
54. Stanforth, L. M., S. M. Louda, and R. L. Bevill. 1997. Insect herbivory on juveniles of a threatened plant, Cirsium pitcheri, in relation to plant size, density and distribution. Ecoscience 4:57-66.
55. Stearns, S. C. 1992. The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
56. Thompson, J. N. 1998. Rapid evolution as an ecological process. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13:329-332.
57. Turnbull, L., M. J. Crawley, and M. Rees. 2000. Are plant populations seed-limited? A review of seed sowing experiments. Oikos 88:225-238.
58. Venables, W. N., and B. D. Ripley. 1997. Modern applied statistics with S-PLUS. Springer Verlag, New York, New York, USA.
59. Weiner, J., S. Martinez, H. Muller-Scharer, P. Stoll, and B. Schmid. 1997. How important are environmental maternal effects in plants? A study with Centaurea maculosa. Journal of Ecology 85:133-142.
60. Wesselingh, R. A., and T. J. de Jong. 1995. Bidirectional selection on threshold size for flowering in Cynoglossum officinale (Hounds tongue). Heredity 74:415-424.
61. Wesselingh, R. A., and P. G. L. Klinkhamer. 1996. Threshold size for vernalization in Senecio jacobaea: genetic variation and response to artificial selection. Functional Ecology 10: 281-288.
62. Williams, G. C. 1966. Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
63. Zwölfer, H., and P. Harris. 1984. Biology and host specificity of Rhincyllus conicus (Frol.) (Col., Curculionidae), a successful agent for biocontrol of the thistle Carduus nutans L. Journal of Applied Entomology 97:36-62.