Competition between hatchery-reared and wild juvenile Chinook salmon in enclosures in the Sacramento River, California

Transactions of the American Fisheries Society

Volumn 134, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 44-58

  Weber, Edward D ^a,b   Fausch, Kurt D ^a  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^b VERSAR INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); EMIGRATION; ENCLOSURE EXPERIMENT; GROWTH; HATCHERY; SALMONID; SURVIVAL; WILD POPULATION;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; SACRAMENTO RIVER; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA;

EID: 13844320896     PISSN: 00028487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/FT03-189.1     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Anderson, D. R., K. P. Burnham, and W. L. Thompson. 2000. Null hypothesis testing: problems, prevalence, and an alternative. Journal of Wildlife Management 64:912-923.
2. Bachman, R. A. 1984. Foraging behavior of free-ranging wild and hatchery brown trout in a stream. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:1-32.
3. Bams, R. A. 1967. Differences in performance of naturally and artificially propagated sockeye salmon migrant fry, as measured with swimming and predation tests. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 24:1117-1153.
4. Berejikian, B. A., S. B. Mathews, and T. P. Quinn. 1996. Effects of hatchery and wild ancestry and rearing environments on the development of agonistic behavior in steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fry. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53:2004-2014.
5. Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edition. Springer-Verlag, New York.
6. Cummins, K. W., and J. C. Wuycheck. 1971. Caloric equivalents for investigations in ecological energetics. Internationale Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 18:1-58.
7. Eberhardt, L. L. 1978. Appraising variability in population studies. Journal of Wildlife Management 42:207-238.
8. Einum, S., and I. A. Fleming. 2001. Implications of stocking: ecological interactions between wild and released salmonids. Nordic Journal of Freshwater Research 75:56-70.
9. Everest, F. H., and D. W. Chapman. 1972. Habitat selection and spatial interaction by juvenile salmon and steelhead trout in two Idaho streams. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 29:91-100.
10. Fausch, K. D. 1993. Experimental analysis of microhabitat selection by juvenile steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and coho salmon (O. kisutch) in a British Columbia stream. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 50:1198-1207.
11. Fausch, K. D. 1998. Interspecific competition and juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): on testing effects and evaluating the evidence across scales. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55(Supplement 1):218-231.
12. Fenderson, O. C., W. H. Everhart, and K. M. Muth. 1968. Comparative agonistic and feeding behaviour of hatchery-reared and wild salmon in aquaria. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 25:1-14.
13. Fleming, I. A., K. Hindar, I. B. Mjolnerod, B. Jonsson, T. Balstad, and A. Lamberg. 2000. Lifetime success and interactions of farm salmon invading a native population. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 267:1517-1523.
14. Gerard, P. D., D. R. Smith, and G. Weerakkody. 1998. Limits of retrospective power analysis. Journal of Wildlife Management 62:801-807.
15. Goodman, S. N., and J. A. Berlin. 1994. The use of predicted confidence intervals when planning experiments and the misuse of power when interpreting results. Annals of Internal Medicine 121:200-206.
16. Gross, M. R. 1998. One species with two biologies: Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in the wild and in aquaculture. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55(supplement 1):131-144.
17. Healey, M. C. 1983. Coastwide distribution and ocean migration patterns of stream- and ocean-type Chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. Canadian Field-Naturalist 97:427-433.
18. Hjort, R. C., and C. B. Schreck. 1982. Phenotypic differences among stocks of hatchery and wild coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch in Oregon, Washington, and California. Fishery Bulletin 80:105-119.
19. Hosmer, D. W., and S. Lemeshow. 2000. Applied logistic regression, 2nd edition. Wiley, New York.
20. Hurvich, C. M., and C. L. Tsai. 1989. Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika 76:297-307.
21. Johnson, R. R., F. W. Fisher, and D. D. Weigand. 1992. Use of growth data to determine the spatial and temporal distribution of four runs of juvenile Chinook salmon in the Sacramento River, California. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Report AFF-FRO-92-15, Red Bluff, California.
22. Kelly, W. H. 1967. Marking freshwater and a marine fish by injected dyes. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 96:163-174.
23. Mason, J. C., and D. W. Chapman. 1965. Significance of early emergence, environmental rearing capacity, and behavioral ecology of juvenile coho salmon in stream channels. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 22:173-190.
24. McMichael, G. A., C. S. Sharpe, and T. N. Pearsons. 1997. Effects of residual hatchery-reared steelhead on growth of wild rainbow and spring Chinook salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 126:230-239.
25. Mesa, M. G. 1991. Variation in feeding, aggression, and position choice between hatchery and wild cutthroat trout in an artificial stream. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 120:723-727.
26. Moyle, P. B., and J. J. Cech. 2000. Fishes: an introduction to ichthyology, 4th edition. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
27. Nickelson, T. E., M. F. Solazzi, and S. L. Johnson. 1986. Use of hatchery coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) presmolts to rebuild wild populations in Oregon coastal streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 43:2443-2449.
28. Olla, B. L., M. W. Davis, and C. H. Ryer. 1998. Understanding how the hatchery environment represses or promotes the development of behavioral survival skills. Bulletin of Marine Science 62:531-550.
29. Peery, C. A., and T. C. Bjornn. 2004. Interactions between natural and hatchery Chinook salmon parr in a laboratory stream channel. Fisheries Research 66:311-324.
30. Quinn, T. P., and N. P. Peterson. 1996. The influence of habitat complexity and fish size on overwinter survival and growth of individually marked juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) in Big Beef Creek, Washington. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53:1555-1564.
31. Rhodes, J. S., and T. P. Quinn. 1998. Factors affecting the outcome of territorial contests between hatchery and naturally reared coho salmon parr in the laboratory. Journal of Fish Biology 53:1220-1230.
32. Ricker, W. E. 1975. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Fisheries Research Board of Canada Bulletin 191.
33. SAS Institute. 2001. SAS user's guide, version 8.02. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.
34. Swain, D. P., and B. E. Riddell. 1990. Variation in agonistic behaviour between newly emerged juveniles from hatchery and wild populations of coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 47:566-571.
35. Taylor, E. B. 1990a. Phenotypic correlates of life history variation in juvenile Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. Journal of Animal Ecology 59:455-468.
36. Taylor, E. B. 1990b. Variability in agonistic behaviour and salinity tolerance between and within two populations of juvenile Chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, with contrasting life histories. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 47:2172-2180.
37. Taylor, E. B., and P. A. Larkin. 1986. Current response and agonistic behavior in newly emerged fry of Chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, from ocean- and stream-type populations. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 43:565-573.
38. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2001a. Biological assessment of artificial propagation at Coleman National Fish Hatchery and Livingston Stone National Fish Hatchery: program description and incidental take of Chinook salmon and steelhead trout. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Red Bluff Fish and Wildlife Office, Red Bluff, California.
39. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2001b. Final restoration plan for the anadromous fish restoration program: a plan to increase natural production of anadromous fish in the Central Valley of California. Available: http://www.delta.dfg.ca.gov/afrp/afrp.asp. (August 2003).
40. Weber, E. D., and K. D. Fausch. 2003. Interactions between hatchery and wild salmonids in streams: differences in biology and evidence for competition. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 60:1018-1036.
41. Weber, E. D., and K. D. Fausch. 2004. Abundance and size distribution of ocean-type juvenile Chinook salmon in the upper Sacramento river margin before and after hatchery releases. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 24:1447-1455.
42. White, R. J., J. R. Karr, and W. N. Nehlsen. 1995. Better roles for fish stocking in aquatic resource management. Pages 527-547 in H. L. Schramm and R. G. Piper, editors. Uses and effects of cultured fishes in aquatic ecosystems. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 15, Bethesda, Maryland.
43. Yoshiyama, R. M., F. W. Fisher, and P. B. Moyle. 1998. Historical abundance and decline of Chinook salmon in the Central Valley region of California. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 18:487-521.