INTONATION AS COHESION in ACADEMIC DISCOURSE

Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 1-25

  Wennerstrom, Ann ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85136272371     PISSN: 02722631     EISSN: 14701545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0272263198001016     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Allison, D. & Tauroza, S. (1995). The effect of discourse organisation on lecture comprehension. English for Special Purposes, 14, 157-173.
2. Beckman, M., & Pierrehumbert, J. (1986). Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Year. book, 3, 15-70.
3. Bolinger, D. (1978). Intonation across languages. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language Phonolou (pp. 471-524). Stanford, CA: Stanford, University Press.
4. Bolinger, D. I Intonation and its parts. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
5. Brazil, D. (1985). The communicative value of intonation. Discourse Analysis Monograph 8. Birmingham, UK: University of Birmingham, English Language Research.
6. Brazil, D., Coulthard, M., & Johns, A. (1980). Discourse intonation and language teaching. London: Longman.
7. Brown, G. (1977). Listening to spoken English. London: Longman.
8. Brown, G Currie, K., & Kenworthy, J. (1980). Questions of intonation. London: Croom Helm.
9. Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Chafe, W. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Chaudron, C., & Richards, J. (1986). The effect of discourse markers on the comprehension of lectures. Applied Linguistics, 7, 113-127.
12. Chun, D. (1988). The neglected role of intonation in communicative competence and proficiency. Modern language Journal, 72, 295-303.
13. Connor, U. (1984). A study of cohesion and coherence in ESL students' writing. Papers in Linguistics: Interna-Tional Journal of Human Communication, 17, 301-316.
14. Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1986). An introduction to English prosody. Baltimore, MD: Edward Arnold.
15. Davies, C., & Tyler, A. (1994). Demystifying cross-cultural (miskommunication: Improving performance through balanced feedback in a situated context. In C. Madden & C. Myers (Eds.), Discourse and performance of international teaching assistants (pp. 201-220). Alexandria, VA: TBOL.
16. Dunkel, P., & Davis, J. (1994). The effects of rhetorical signalling cues on the recall of English lecture information by LSL and ENL listeners. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic listening: Research perspectives (pp. 55-74). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Educational Testing Service (1985). Speaking proficiency English assessment kit. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
18. Flowerdew, J. (1994). Academic listening Research perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Flowerdew, J., & Tauroza, S. (1995). The effect of discourse markers on second language lecture comprehen-sion. Studies in Second Innguage Acquisition, 17, 435-458.
20. Halle, M., & Vergnaud, J. (1987). An essay on stress. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Halliday, M. (1967). Intonation and grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton.
22. Halliday, M., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
23. Hasan, R. (1984). Coherence and cohesive harmony. In J. Flood (Ed.l Understanding reading comprehension (pp. 181-219). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
24. Hatch, E, & Lazaraton, A. (1991). The research manual: Design and statistics for applied linguistics. New York: Newbury House.
25. Hayes, B. (1995). Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26. Hewings, M. (1995). The English intonation of native speakers and Indonesian learners: A comparative study. Regional English Language Centre Journal, 26, 27-46.
27. Johns, A. (1984). Textual cohesion and the Chinese speaker of English. Language Learning and Communica-Tion, 3, 69-74.
28. Juffs, A. (1990). Tone, syllable structure and interlanguage phonology: Chinese learners' stress errors. Interna-Tional Review of Applied Linguistics, 28, 99-117.
29. Kuo, C. (1995). Cohesion and coherence in academic writing: From lexical choice to organization. Regional English Language Centre Journal, 26, 47-62.
30. Labov, W., & Waletsky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helms (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12-44). Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
31. Ladd, D. R. (1980). The structure of intonational meaning. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
32. Ladd, D. R. (1996). Intonational phonology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Lebauer, R. (1984). Using lecture transcripts in EAP lecture comprehension courses. TESOL Quarterly, 18, 41-53.
34. Lepetit, D. (1989). Cross-linguistic influence in intonation: French/Japanese and French/EngIish. Language Learning, 39, 397-413.
35. Liberman, M. (1975). The intonation system of English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge. Distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1978.
36. Nattinger, J., & DeCarrico, J. (1992). Lexical phrases and language teaching. New York: Oxford University
37. Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
38. Olsen, L, & Huckin, T. (1990). Point-driven understanding in engineering lecture comprehension. English for Specific Purposes, 9, 33-47.
39. Parsons, G. (1991). Cohesion coherence: Scientific texts. In E. Ventola (Ed.), Functional and systemic linguis-Tic: Approaches and uses (pp. 414-429). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
40. Pierrehumbert, J. (1980). The phonoloo and phonetics of English intonation. Unpublished doctoral disserta-Tion, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge
41. Pierrehumbert, J., & Beckman, M. (1988). Japanese tone structure, Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 15.
42. Pierrehumbert, J., & Hirschberg, J. (1990). The meaning of intonational contours in discourse. In P. Cohen, J. Morgan, & M. Pollack (Eds.), Intentions in communication (pp. 271-311). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43. Reynolds, D. (1995). Repetition in nonnative speaker writing: More than quantity. Studies in Innguage Acquisition, 17, 185-209.
44. Roach, P. (1994). Conversion between prosodic transcription systems: "Standard British" and TOBI. Speech Communication, 15, 91-99.
45. Rounds, P. (1987). Characterizing successful classroom discourse for NNS teaching assistant training. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 643-672.
46. Shen, X. (1990a). Ability of learning the prosody of an intonational language by speakers of a tonal language: Chinese speakers learning French prosody. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 28, 119-134.
47. Shen, X. (1990b). The prosody Of Mandarin Chinese. University of California Publications in Linguistics 118. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
48. Tench, P. (1991). The stylistic potential of intonation. In W. van Peer (Ed), The taming Of the text (pp. 50-84). London: Routledge
49. Tench, P. (1996). The intonation systems of English. London: Cassell.
50. Tyler, A. (1992). Discourse structure and the perception of incoherence in ITAs' spoken discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 713-729.
51. University of Washington Educational Outreach English as a Second Language Programs. (1995). 102B final examination performance criteria. Operations Manual. Unpublished manual, University of Washington, Seattle.
52. Upshur, J., & Turner, C. (1995). Constructing rating scales for second language tests. English Language Teaching Journal, 49, 3-12.
53. Wennerstrom, A. (1992). The paratone: An intonational marker of English discourse organization. Unpub-lished M.A.Thesis, University of Washington, Seattle.
54. Wennerstrom, A. (1994). Intonational meaning in English discourse: A study of nonnative speakers. Applied Linguistics, 15, 399-420.
55. Wennerstrom, A. (1997). Discourse intonation and second language acquisition: Three genre-based studies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.
56. Wenk, B. (1985). Speech rhythms in second language acquisition. Innguage and Speech, 28, 157-175.
57. Werth, P. (1984). Focus, coherence and emphasis. London: Croom Helm.
58. Williams, J. (1992). Planning, discourse marking, and the comprehensibility of international teaching assis-Tants. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 693-712.
59. Yule, G. (1980). Speakers' topics and major paratones. Lingua, 52, 33-47.