The state of our art: Intergenerational program research and evaluation: Part two

Journal of Intergenerational Relationships

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 79-94

  Kuehne, Valerie S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Intergenerational; Outcomes; Research; Theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 13644268532     PISSN: 15350770     EISSN: 15350932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J194v01n02_07     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. American Association of Retired Persons (1998). Intergenerational Shared Site Project: Final Report. Washington, DC: AaRP, 601 E Street NW, Washington, DC 20049.
2. Angersbach, H. & Jones-Forster, S. (1999). Intergenerational interactions: A descriptive analysis of elder-child interactions in a campus-based child care center. In V.S. Kuehne (Ed.), Intergenerational programs: Understanding what we have created (pp. 117-128). New York: The Haworth Press, Inc.
3. Bales, S., Eklund, S., & Siffin, C. (2000). children’s perceptions of elders before and after a school-based intergenerational program. Educational Gerontology, 26, 677-689.
4. Barton, H. (1999). Effects of an intergenerational program on the attitudes of emotionally disturbed youth toward the elderly. Educational Gerontology, 25, 623-640.
5. Bostrum, A., Hatton-Yeo, A., Ohsako, T., & Sawano, Y. (2000). A general assessment of IP initiatives in the countries involved. In A. Hatton-Yeo & T. Ohsako (Eds.), Intergenerational programmes: Public policy and research implications and international perspectives (pp. 3-8). Hamburg, Germany: UNESCO Institute for Education.
6. Cai, D., Giles, H., & Noels, K. (1998). Elderly perceptions of communication with older and younger adults in China: Implications for mental health. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26(1), 32-51.
7. Camp, C.J., Judge, K.S., Bye, C.A., Fox, K.M., Bowden, J., Bell, M., Valencic, K., & Mattern, J.M. (1997). An intergenerational program for persons with dementia using Montessori methods. The Gerontologist, 37, 5, 688-692.
8. Chattin-McNichols, J. (1992). The Montessori controversy. Albany, NY: Delmar.
9. Chowdhary, U., Schultz, C.M., Hasselris, P., Kujath, H.A., Penn, D., & Henson, S. (2000). Intergenerating activities and aging appreciation of elementary school children. Educational Gerontology, 26(6), 541-565.
10. Connell, J., Kubisch, A., Schorr, L., & Weiss, C. (Eds.) (1995). New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Concepts, methods and contexts. New York: The Aspen Institute.
11. Fox, S., & Giles, H. (1993). Accommodating intergenerational contact: A critique and theoretical model. Journal of Aging Studies, 7, 423-451.
12. Griff, M., Lambert, D., Dellmann-Jenkins, M., & Fruit, D. (1996). Intergenerational activity analysis with three groups of older adults: Frail, community-living and Alzheimer’s. Educational Gerontology, 22, 601-612.
13. Gush, C. (2000). South Africa. In A. Hatton-Yeo & T. Ohsako (Eds.), Intergenerational programmes: Public policy and research implications and international perspectives (pp. 44-48). Hamburg, Germany: UNESCO Institute for Education.
14. Hamilton, G., Brown, S., Alonzo, T., Glover, M., Mersereau, Y., & Wilson, P. (1999). Building community for the long term: An intergenerational commitment. The Gerontologist, 39(2), 235-238.
15. Hanks, R.S. & Icenogel, M. (2001). Preparing for an Age-Diverse workforce: Intergenerational service-learning in social gerontology and business curricula. Educational Gerontology, 27(1), 49-71.
16. Hatton-Yeo, A., Klerq, J., Ohsako, T., & Newman, S. (2000). Public policy and research recommendations: An international perspective. In A. Hatton-Yeo & T. Ohsako (Eds.), Intergenerational programmes: Public policy and research implications and international perspectives (pp. 9-17). Hamburg, Germany: UNESCO Institute for Education.
17. Kaplan, M. (1996). A look at intergenerational program initiatives in Japan: A preliminary comparison with the United States. The Southwest Journal on Aging, 12(1&2), 73-79.
18. Kaplan, M. (1997). The benefits of intergenerational community service projects: Implications for promoting intergenerational unity, community activism, and cultural continuity. In K. Brabazon & R. Disch (Eds.), Intergenerational approaches in aging: Implications for education, policy and practice (pp. 211-228). New York: The Haworth Press, Inc.
19. Kassab, C., & Vance, L. (1999). An assessment of the effectiveness of an intergenerational program for youth. Psychological Reports, 84, 198-200.
20. Klerq, J. (2000). The Netherlands. In A. Hatton-Yeo & T. Ohsako (Eds.), Intergenerational programmes: Public policy and research implications and international perspectives (pp. 35-39). Hamburg, Germany: UNESCO Institute for Education.
21. Knapp, J.L., & Stubblefield, P. (2000). Changing students’ perceptions of aging: The impact of an intergenerational service learning course. Educational Gerontology, 26, 611-621.
22. Kocarnik, R., & Ponzetti, J. (1999). Corporate opportunities for intergenerational linkages: A human resources perspective. In V. S. Kuehne (Ed.), Intergenerational programs: Understanding what we have created (pp. 149-159). New York: The Haworth Press, Inc.
23. Kretzmann, J., & McKnight, J. (1993). Building communities from the inside out: A path toward finding and mobilizing a community’s assets. Evanston, IL: Asset-Based Community Development Institute, Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University.
24. Kubisch, A., Weiss, C., Schorr, L., & Connell, J. (1995). Introduction. In J. Connell, A. Kubisch, L. Schorr, & C. Weiss (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Concepts, methods, and contexts (pp. 1-21). New York: The Aspen Institute.
25. Kuehne, V.S. (1988). “Younger friends/Older friends”: A study of intergenerational interactions. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 24(1), 14-21.
26. Kuehne, V.S. (1996). Evaluate your intergenerational program: Four recommendations for human service practitioners. The Southwest Journal on Aging, 12(1&2), 27-32.
27. Kuehne, V.S., & Kaplan, M. (2001). Evaluation and research on intergenerational shared site facilities and programs: What we know and what we need to learn. Unpublished manuscript commissioned by Generations United, Washington, DC.
28. Larkin, E., & Newman, S. (2001). Benefits of intergenerational staffing in preschools. Educational Gerontology, 27, 373-385.
29. Møller, V. (1994). Intergenerational relations: A South African research agenda. Southern African Journal of Gerontology, 3, 2, 1-5.
30. Moody, H., & Disch, R. (1989). Intergenerational programming between young and old. The Generational Journal, 1(3), 25-27.
31. Newman, S., Faux, R., & Larimer, B. (1997). children’s views of aging: Their attitudes and values. The Gerontologist, 37(3), 412-417.
32. Newman, S., Morris, G., & Streetman, H. (1999). Elder-child interaction analysis: An observation instrument for classrooms involving older adults as mentors, tutors, or resource persons. In V.S. Kuehne (Ed.), Intergenerational programs: Understanding what we have created (pp. 129-145). New York: The Haworth Press, Inc.
33. Osborne, S.S., & Bullock, J.R. (2000). Intergenerational programming in action: Befrienders. Educational Gerontology, 26, 169-182.
34. Penninx, K. (1999). De buurt voor alle leeftijden: Intergenerationele buurtontwikkeling in het kader van social beleid. Utrecht, Netherlands: NIZW.
35. Pinquart, M., Wenzel, S., & Sorensen, S. (2000). Changes in attitudes among children and elderly adults in intergenerational group work. Educational Gerontology, 26(6), 523-541.
36. Schultz, R., & Hanusa, B. (1978). Long-term effects of control and predictability-enhancing interventions: Findings and ethical issues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 563-573.
37. Seefeldt, C. (1987). The effects of preschoolers’ visits to a nursing home. The Gerontologist, 27, 228-232.
38. Sherif, M. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The robbers’ cave experiment. Norman, OK: University Books.
39. Smith, M., & Glass, G. (1987). Research and evaluation in education and the social sciences. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
40. Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups. London: Academic Press.
41. Thang, L. (2001). Generations in touch: Linking the old and young in a Tokyo neighborhood. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.