Radiological assessment of penile prosthesis: The role of magnetic resonance imaging

World Journal of Urology

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 371-377

  Moncada, Ignacio ^a   Jara, José ^a   Cabello, Ramiro ^a   Monzo, Juan Ignacio ^a   Hernández, Carlos ^a  

^a HOSPITAL GENERAL UNIVERSITARIO GREGORIO MARAÑÓN   (Spain)

Author keywords

Complications; Erectile dysfunction; Magnetic resonance imaging; Penile prosthesis

Indexed keywords

ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; GRAM NEGATIVE BACTERIUM; HUMAN; IONIZING RADIATION; MALE; MATERIAL COATING; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL EXPERT; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; MOTIVATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGICAL ANATOMY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PELVIS RADIOGRAPHY; PENIS INJURY; PENIS PROSTHESIS; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; REOPERATION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDIS; SURGICAL APPROACH; TREATMENT PLANNING; UROLOGY;

HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PENILE PROSTHESIS; PENIS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN;

EID: 13644263999     PISSN: 07244983     EISSN: 14338726     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-004-0427-7     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Montague DK, Barada JH, Belker AM et al. (1996) Clinical guidelines panel on erectile dysfunction: Summary report on the treatment of organic erectile dysfunction. J Urol 156:2007-2011 10.1097/00005392-199612000-00033
2. Rajpurkar A, Dhabuwala CB (2003) Comparison of satisfaction rates and erectile function in patients treated with sildenafil, intracavernous prostaglandin E1 and penile implant surgery for erectile dysfunction in urology practice. J Urol 170:159-163 10.1097/01.ju.0000072524.82345.6d
3. Scott FB, Bradley WE, Timm GW (1973) Management of erectile impotence: Use of implantable inflatable prosthesis. Urology 2:80 10.1016/0090-4295(73)90337-3
4. Montague DK, Angermeier KW (2003) Contemporary aspects of penile prosthesis implantation. Urol Int 70:141-146 10.1159/000068189
5. Nielsen KT, Bruskewitz RC (1989) Semirigid and malleable rod penile prostheses. Urol Clin North Am 16:13-23 1:STN:280:BiaC3s%2FmvFI%3D
6. Kaftan B, Fisch M, Schreiter F (2001) Surgery of the penis: reconstruction and prostheses. Curr Opin Urol 11:263-265 10.1097/00042307-200105000-00003
7. Govier FE, Gibbons RP, Correa RJ, Pritchett TR, Kramer-Levien D (1998) Mechanical reliability, surgical complications, and patient and partner satisfaction of the modern three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis. Urology 52:282-286 10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00177-0
8. Carson CC, Mulcahy JJ, Govier FE (2000) Efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction outcomes of the AMS 700CX inflatable penile prosthesis: results of a long-term multicenter study. AMS 700CX Study Group. J Urol 164:376-380 10.1097/00005392-200008000-00025
9. Parulkar BG, Hamid S, Dhabuwala CB (1994) Revision surgery for penile implants. Int J Impot Res 6:17-23 1:STN:280:ByuB1M%2Fls1c%3D
10. Wilson SK, Cleves MA, Delk JR 2nd (1999) Comparison of mechanical reliability of original and enhanced Mentor Alpha I penile prosthesis. J Urol 162:715-718 10.1097/00005392-199909010-00022
11. Dubocq F, Tefilli MV, Gheiler EL, Li H, Dhabuwala CB (1998) Long-term mechanical reliability of multicomponent inflatable penile prosthesis: Comparison of device survival. Urology 52:277-281 10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00174-5
12. Carson CC (2003) Diagnosis, treatment and prevention of penile prosthesis infection. Int J Impot Res 15 [Suppl 5]:S139-146
13. Mulcahy JJ (2000) Long-term experience with salvage of infected penile implants. J Urol 163:481-482 10.1097/00005392-200002000-00021
14. Carson CC (2003) Diagnosis, treatment and prevention of penile prosthesis infection. Int J Impot Res 15 [Suppl 5]:S139-146
15. Wilson SK, Carson CC, Cleves MA, Delk JR 2nd (1998) Quantifying risk of penile prosthesis infection with elevated glycosylated hemoglobin. J Urol 159:1537-1540 10.1097/00005392-199805000-00034
16. Carson CC, Mulcahy JJ, Govier FE (2000) Efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction outcomes of the AMS 700CX inflatable penile prosthesis: results of a long-term multicenter study. AMS 700CX Study Group. J Urol 164:376-380 10.1097/00005392-200008000-00025
17. Cohan RH, Dunnick NR, Carson CC (1989) Radiology of penile prostheses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 152:925-931 1:STN:280:BiaB3crivFU%3D
18. Suarez G, Baum N (1987) Ultrasonography in evaluation of mechanical problems of inflatable penile prosthesis. Urology 30:388-389 10.1016/0090-4295(87)90310-4
19. Epstein S, Ramanathan K, Yaghoobian J, Chaudary RR (). Sonographic appearance of the reservoir of an inflatable penile prosthesis. J Clin Ultrasound. 1987 Jun;15(5):353-356.
20. Thiel DD, Broderick GA, Bridges M (2003) Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating inflatable penile prosthesis malfunction and complaints. Int J Impot Res 15 [Suppl 5]:S155-161
21. Vossough A, Pretorius ES, Siegelman ES, Ramchandani P, Banner MP (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging of the penis. Abdom Imaging 27:640-659 10.1007/s00261-001-0136-2
22. Hricak H, Marotti M, Gilbert TJ, Lue,TF, Wetzel LH, McAninch JW, Tanagho EA (1988) Normal penile anatomy and abnormal penile conditions: Evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 169:683 1:STN:280:BiaD2c3otVI%3D
23. Levin MF, Munk PL, Vellet AD, Chin JL (1994) Self-contained, inflatable penile prosthesis: Magnetic resonance appearance. Australas Rad 38:51 1:STN:280:ByuC1MjmsVQ%3D
24. Shellock FG, Curtis JS (1991) MR imaging and biomedical implants, materials, and devices: An updated review. Radiology 180:541 1:STN:280:By6B1MjhtVY%3D
25. Moncada I, Hernandez C, Jara J, Hernandez L, Lafuente J, Lledo E, Rodriguez E, De Tejada IS (1998) Buckling of cylinders may cause prolonged penile pain after prosthesis implantation: A case control study using magnetic resonance imaging of the penis. J Urol 160:67-71 10.1097/00005392-199807000-00027