Repeat reliability of the multifocal visual evoked potential in normal and glaucomatous eyes

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 399-408

  Chen, Candice S ^a   Hood, Donald C ^a   Zhang, Xian ^a   Karam, Emely Z ^b   Liebmann, Jeffrey M ^c   Ritch, Robert ^c   Thienprasiddhi, Phamornsak ^c   Greenstein, Vivienne C ^a  

^a Howard Hughes Medical Institute   (United States)

^b Centro Medico Docente La Trinidad   (Venezuela)

^c NEW YORK EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY   (United States)

Author keywords

Multifocal; Perimetry; Visual evoked potential (VEP); Visual field

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MEDICAL RECORD; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; ROOT MEAN SQUARE MEASURE; STATIC AUTOMATED PERIMETRY; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; PERIMETRY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0141893499     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00061198-200310000-00002     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Brigell MG. The visual evoked potential. In: Fishman, GA, Birch DG, Holder GE, Brigell MG, eds. Electrophysiologic Testing in Disorders of the Retina, Optic Nerve, and Visual Pathway. 2nd edition. (Ophthalmology Monographs). San Francisco: The Foundation of the American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2001:237-278.
2. Baseler HA, Sutter EE, Klein SA, et al. The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. Electroencephy Clin Neurophysiol. 1994;90:65-81.
3. Hood DC, Greenstein VC. The multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2003;22:201-251.
4. Hood DC, Odel JG, Winn BJ. The mfVEP: applications and limitations in neuro-ophthalmology. J Neuro Ophthalmol. 2003;(under review).
5. Klistorner AI, Graham SL, Grigg JR, et al. Multifocal topographic visual evoked potential: Improving objective detection of local visual field defects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:937-950.
6. Graham SL, Klistorner AI, Grigg JR, et al. Objective VEP perimetry in glaucoma: asymmetry analysis to identify early deficits. J Glaucoma. 2000;9:10-19.
7. Hood DC, Zhang X, Greenstein VC, et al. An interocular comparison of the multifocal VEP: a possible technique for detecting local damage to the optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:1580-1587.
8. Hood DC, Zhang X. Multifocal ERG and VEP responses and visual fields: comparing disease-related changes. Doc Ophthalmol. 2000;100:115-137.
9. Klistorner AI, Graham SL. Objective perimetry in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:2283-2299.
10. Hasegawa S, Abe H. Mapping of Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects by Multifocal VEPs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:3341-3348.
11. Goldberg I, Graham SL, Klistorner AI. Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;133:29-39.
12. Hood DC, Greenstein VC, Odel JG, et al. Visual field defects and multifocal visual evoked potentials: evidence for linear relationship. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1672-1681.
13. Fortune B, Goh K, Demirel S, et al. Detection of glaucomatous visual field loss using multifocal VEP. In: Wall M, Mills RP, eds. Perimetry Update 2002/3:in press.
14. Hood DC, Zhang X, Winn BJ. Detecting glaucomatous damage with the mfVEP: How can a monocular test work? J Glaucoma. 2003;12:3-15.
15. Hood DC, Odel JG, Zhang X. Tracking the recovery of local optic nerve function after optic neuritis: A multifocal VEP study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:4032-4038.
16. Kardon RH, Givre SJ, Wall M, et al. Comparison of threshold and multifocal-VEP perimetry in recovered optic neuritis. In: Wall M, Mills RP, eds. Perimetry Update 2000/2001: Proceedings of the XVIIth International Perimetric Society Meeting Sept. 6-9. New York, New York:Kugler Publications; 2000/2001:19-28.
17. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J. Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105:1544-1549.
18. Johnson CA, Spry PGD. Normal age-related sensitivity loss for perimetry test that evaluate a variety of different visual functions(abstract). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:S67.
19. Heijl A, Lindgren A, Lindgren G, et al. Inter-test threshold variability in glaucoma importance of censored observations and general field status. In: Perimetry Update 1990/1991:189-192.
20. Chauhan BC, Johnson CA. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:648-656.