Is it the technology or the teacher? A comparison of online and traditional english composition classes

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 163-180

  Finlay, William ^a   Desmet, Christy ^a   Evans, Lorraine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 13544258908     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/URJJ-HXHA-JA08-5LVL     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Alavi, M. (1994). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation. MIS Quarterly, 18, 159-174.
2. Alavi, M., Wheeler, B. C., & Valacich, J. S. (1995). Using IT to re-engineer business education: An exploratory investigation of collaborative telelearning. MIS Quarterly, 19, 293-312.
3. Allen, M., Bourhis, J., Burrell, N., & Mabry, E. (2002). Comparing student satisfaction with distance education to traditional classrooms in higher education: A meta-analysis. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 83-97.
4. Arbaugh, J. B. (2000a). Virtual classroom characteristics and student satisfaction with Internet-based MBA courses. Journal of Management Education, 24, 32-54.
5. Arbaugh, J. B. (2000b). Virtual classroom versus physical classroom: An exploratory study of class discussion patterns and student learning in an asynchronous Internet-based MBA course. Journal of Management Education, 24, 213-233.
6. Arbaugh, J. B. (2000c). How classroom environment and student engagement affect learning in Internet-based MBA courses. Business Communication Quarterly, 63(4), 9-26.
7. Arbaugh, J. B. (2001). How instructor immediacy behaviors affect student satisfaction and learning in Web-based courses. Business Communication Quarterly, 64(4), 42-54.
8. Collins, J., & Pascarella, E. T. (2003). Learning on campus and learning at a distance: A randomized instructional experiment. Research in Higher Education, 44(3), 315-326.
9. Corston, R., & Colman, A. M. (1996). Gender and social facilitation effects on computer competence and attitudes toward computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14, 171-183.
10. Fraser, B. (1993). Classroom environments in post-compulsory education. Youth Studies, 12(4), 41-46.
11. Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (1997). Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail: An extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS Quarterly, 21, 389-400.
12. Hiltz, S. R., & Wellman, B. (1997). Asynchronous learning networks as a virtual classroom. Communications of the ACM, 40(9), 44-49.
13. Inman, E., Kerwin, M., & Mayes, L. (1999). Instructor and student attitudes toward distance learning. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 23, 581-591.
14. Maki, R.H., & Maki, W. S. (2003). Prediction of learning and satisfaction in Web-based and lecture courses. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26, 197-219.
15. Merisotis, J. P., & Phipps, R. A. (1999). What's the difference? Change, 31(3), 13-20.
16. Neuhauser, C. (2002). Learning style and effectiveness of online and face-to-face instruction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 99-113.
17. Smith, G. G., Ferguson, D., & Caris, M. (2003). The Web versus the classroom: Instructor experiences in discussion-based and mathematics-based disciplines. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29, 29-59.
18. Stork, J., & Sproull, L. (1995). Through a glass darkly: What do people learn in video-conferences? Human Communication Research, 22, 197-219.
19. Strauss, S. G. (1996). Getting a clue: Communication media and information distribution effects on group process and performance. Small Group Research, 27, 115-142.
20. Thurmond, V. A., Wambach, K., Connors, H. R., & Frey, B. B. (2002). Evaluation of student satisfaction: Determining the impact of a Web-based environment by controlling for student characteristics. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 169-189.