Instructor and student attitudes toward distance learning

Community College Journal of Research and Practice

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 581-591

  Inman, Elliot ^a   Kerwin, Michael ^a   Mayes, Larry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905088401     PISSN: 10668926     EISSN: 15210413     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/106689299264594     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Alaska University, Anchorage. (1989). Distance education teaching tips at a glance. ERIC Document Reproduction Service, ED 343 576.
2. Anderson, T. D., & Garrison, D. R. (1995). Transactional issues in distance education: The impact of design in audioteleconferencing. The American Journal of Distance Education, 9, 27-45.
3. Bailey, C., & Chambers, J. (1996). Interactive learning and technology in the US sciences and mathematics reform movement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 27, 123-133.
4. Beaudoin, M. (1990). The instructor’s changing role in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 4, 21-29.
5. Blanchard, W. (1989). Telecourse effectiveness: A research-review update. ERIC Document Reproduction Service, ED 320 554.
6. Clark, T. (1993). Attitudes of higher education faculty toward distance education: A national survey. The A merican Journal of Distance Education, 7, 19-33.
7. Dede, C. (1996). The evolution of distance education: Emerging technologies and distributed learning. The American Journal of Distance Education, 10, 4-36.
8. Easterday, N. (1997). Distance education and 2-year colleges. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 21, 23-36.
9. Fulford, C. P., & Zhang, S. (1993). Perceptions of interaction: The critical predictor in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 7, 8-21.
10. Garrett, R. L. (1995). Computer-assisted instruction in 2-year colleges: Technology for innovative teaching. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 19, 529-536.
11. Hillman, D. C. A., Willis, D. J., & Gunawardena, C. N. (1994). Learner-interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. The American Journal of Distance Education 8, 30-42.
12. Jensen, R. E. (1993). The technology of the future is already here. Academe, 79, 8-13.
13. Johnson, J. L., & Silvernail, D. L. (1994). Impact of interactive television and distance education on student evaluation of courses: A causal model. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 18, 431-440.
14. Kearsley, G. (1996). Education and usual: Comments on Chris Dede’s article. The A merican Journal of Distance Education, 10, 55-58.
15. Steinhart, K. A. (1987). Factors affecting faculty attitudes toward distance teaching. Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 3A.
16. Walker, K. B., & Hackman, M. Z. (1991). Information transfer and nonverbal immediacy as primary predictors of learning and satisfaction in the televised course. ERIC Document Reproduction Service, ED 344 266.
17. Young, J. R. (1997, October 3). Rethinking the role of the professor in an age of hightech tools. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 44, A26-A28.