Multiple comparison procedures: Principles, limits. Applications to microarray phenotype-genotype analysis;Procédures de comparaisons multiples: Principes et limites. Applications à l'etude differentielle de l'expression transcriptionnelle par puces à ADN

Revue d'Epidemiologie et de Sante Publique

Volumn 52, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 523-537

  Dalmasso, C ^a,b   Broet P ^a,b,c   Moreau, T ^a  

^a INSERM   (France)

^b INSTITUT CURIE   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

Author keywords

False discovery rate; Family wise error rate; Microarray; Multiple comparison

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DNA MICROARRAY; FALSE DISCOVERY RATE; FAMILY WISE ERROR RATE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOTYPE; LABORATORY TEST; MULTIPLE COMPARISON PROCEDURE; PHENOTYPE; POSITIVE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 13444300996     PISSN: 03987620     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0398-7620(04)99092-x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Hochberg Y, Tamhane A. Multiple comparison procedures. London: Wiley, 1987.
2. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B 1995; 57: 289-300.
3. Storey JD. A direct approach to false discovery rates. J R Stat Soc Ser B 2001; 64: 479-98.
4. Storey JD. The positive False Discovery Rate: a Bayesian interpretation and the q-value. Ann Stat 2003; 31: 2013-35.
5. Storey JD. False Discovery Rates: theory and applications to DNA microarrays. PhD thesis. Department of Statistics, Stanford University, 2002.
6. Storey JD, Tibshirani R. Statistical significance for genome-wide studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2003; 100: 9440-5.
7. Supplement Chipping Forecast II. Nature Genet 2002; 32.
8. Hedenfalk I, Duggan D, Chen Y, Radmacher M, Bittner M, Simon R, et al. Gene-expression profiles in hereditary breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 539-48.
9. nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1998.
10. Genovese CR, Wasserman L. Operating characteristics and extensions of the false discovery rate procedure. J R Stat Soc Ser B 2002; 64: 499-518.
11. Wright SP. Adjusted P-values for simultaneous inference. Biometrics 1992; 48: 1005-13.
12. Westfall PH, Young SS. Resampling-based multiple testing: Examples and methods for p-value adjustment. London: John Wiley & Sons, 1993.
13. Šidák Z. Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 1967; 62: 626-33.
14. Marcus R, Peritz E, Gabriel KR. On closed testing procedures with special reference to ordered analysis of variance. Biometrika 1976; 63: 655-60.
15. Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 1979; 6: 65-70.
16. Ge Y, Dudoit S, Speed T. Resampling-based multiple testing for microarray data analysis. Test 2003; 12: 1-44.
17. Dudoit S, Yang Y, Callow M, Speed T. Statistical methods for identifying differentially expressed genes in replicated CDNA microarray experiment. Statistica Sinica 2000; 12: 111-39.
18. Hochberg Y. A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 1988; 75: 800-2.
19. Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D. The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann Stat 2001; 29: 1165-88.
20. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. On the "adaptative" control of the false discovery rate. J Educ Behav Stat 2000; 25: 60-83.
21. Benjamini Y, Krieger A, Yekutieli D. Two-staged linear step-up FDR controlling procedure. Research paper 01-3, Dept. of Statistics and OR. Tel Aviv University, 2001.
22. Schweder T, Spjøtvoll E. Plots of p-values to evaluate many tests simultaneously. Biometrika 1982; 69: 493-502.
23. Tusher V, Tibshirani R, Chu G. Significant analysis of microarray applied to the ionising radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2001; 98: 5116-21.
24. Chu G, Narasimhan B, Tibshirani R, Tusher V. SAM, significance analysis of microarrays, users guide and technical document. Technical report. Stanford University, 2001. http://www-stat.stanford.eduAibs/ SAM, 2001
25. Efron B, Tibshirani R, Storey J, Tusher V. Empirical Bayes analysis of a microarray experiment. J Am Stat Assoc 2001; 96: 1151-60.
26. Dudoit S, Shaffer JP, Boldrick JC. Multiple hypothesis testing in microarray experiments. Statistical Science 2003; 18: 71-103.
27. Pounds S, Morris SW. Estimating the occurrence of false positives and false negatives in microarray studies by approximating and partitioning the empirical distribution of p-values. Bioinformatics 2004; 19: 1236-42.
28. Pounds S, Cheng C. Improving false discovery rate estimation. Bioinformatics 2004; 20: 1737-45 (E-pub 2004 Feb 26).
29. Dalmasso C, Broët P, Moreau T. A simple procedure for estimating the false discovery rate. Bioinformatics 2004 [E-pub ahead of print].
30. Schena M. Microarray biochip technology. Biotechniques Press, 2000.
31. Speed T. Statistical analysis of gene expression microarray data. London: Chapman & Hall, 2003.
32. Broët P, Richardson S, Radvanyi F. Bayesian hierarchical model for identifying changes in gene expression from microarray experiments. J Comput Biol 2002; 9: 671-83.
33. Broët P, Lewin A, Richardson S, Dalmasso C, Magdelenat H. A mixture model-based strategy for selecting sets of genes in multiclass response microarray experiments. Bioinformatics 2004 [E-pub ahead of print].
34. Lee ML, Kuo FC, Whitmore GA, Sklar J. Importance of replication in microarray gene expression studies: statistical methods and evidence from repetitive cDNA hybridizations. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2000; 97: 9834-9.
35. Pan W, Lin J, Le C. A mixture model approach to detecting differentially expressed genes with microarray data. Funct Integr Genomics 2003; 3: 117-24.