Multipartite entanglement in 2×2×n quantum systems

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 121011-121019

  Miyake, Akimasa ^a,b   Verstraete, Frank ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR QUANTENOPTIK   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INVARIANCE; MATRIX ALGEBRA; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; PROBABILITY; SET THEORY; STATISTICAL METHODS;

HILBERT SPACES; QUANTUM INFORMATION;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 13444289712     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. C.H. Bennett et al., Phys. Rev. A 63, 012307 (2000).
2. D.M. Greenberger, M. Horne, and A. Zeilinger, Bell's Theorem, Quantum theory and Conceptions of the Universe; Going beyond Bell's Theorem (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1989), p. 69.
3. V. Coffman, J. Kundu, and W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A 61, 052306 (2000).
4. W. Dür, G. Vidal, and J.I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. A 62, 062314 (2000).
5. A. Miyake, Phys. Rev. A 67, 012108 (2003); A. Miyake and M. Wadati, Quantum Inf. Comput. 2, 540 (2002).
6. A. Miyake, Phys. Rev. A 67, 012108 (2003); A. Miyake and M. Wadati, Quantum Inf. Comput. 2, 540 (2002).
7. F. Verstraete, J. Dehaene, and B. De Moor, Phys. Rev. A 68, 012103 (2003).
8. F. Verstraete, J. Dehaene, and B. De Moor, Phys. Rev. A 64, 010101 (2001).
9. F. Verstraete, J. Dehaene, and B. De Moor, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032308 (2002).
10. F. Verstraete, J. Dehaene, B. De Moor, and H. Verschelde, Phys. Rev. A 65, 052112 (2002).
11. A. Klyachko, e-print quant-ph/0206012.
12. J.-G. Luque and J.-Y. Thibon, Phys. Rev. A 67, 042303 (2003); E. Briand, J.-G. Luque, and J.-Y. Thibon, J. Phys. A 36, 9915 (2003).
13. J.-G. Luque and J.-Y. Thibon, Phys. Rev. A 67, 042303 (2003); E. Briand, J.-G. Luque, and J.-Y. Thibon, J. Phys. A 36, 9915 (2003).
14. E. Briand, J.-G. Luque, J.-Y. Thibon, and F. Verstraete, e-print quant-ph/0306122.
15. G. Jaeger et al., Phys. Rev. A 67, 032307 (2003); M. Teodorescu-Frumosu and G. Jaeger, ibid. 67, 052305 (2003).
16. G. Jaeger et al., Phys. Rev. A 67, 032307 (2003); M. Teodorescu-Frumosu and G. Jaeger, ibid. 67, 052305 (2003).
17. Industrious readers might wonder whether there is any relationship between nine classes in this paper and those in Ref. [9], which addressed the SLOCC classification of four-qubit entangled pure states. But, this is just an accident, and there is no correspondence.
18. Comparing the number of degrees of freedom in the SLOCC operations with the dimension of the whole state space, we see whether the number of SLOCC orbits is finite or not. The onion picture of Fig. 1 suggests how SLOCC orbits merge each other when the situation changes from the 4-qubit case to the 2×2×4 case.
19. I.M. Gelfand, M.M. Kapranov, and A.V. Zelevinsky, Discriminants, Resultants, and Multidimensional Determinants (Birkhäuser, Boston, 1994).
20. A. Miyake et al. (unpublished).
21. G. Vidal, J. Mod. Opt. 47, 355 (2000).
22. H. Barnum and N. Linden, J. Phys. A 34, 6787 (2001).
23. M. Zukowski, A. Zeilinger, M.A. Horne, and A.K. Ekert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 4287 (1993).
24. J.-W. Pan, D. Bouwmeester, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3891 (1998).
25. C.H. Bennett et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993).
26. H.-J. Briegel, W. Dür, J.I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5932 (1998).
27. C.H. Bennett, D.P. DiVincenzo, J.A. Smolin, and W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A 54, 3824 (1996).
28. M. Mosca, A. Tapp, and R. de Wolf, e-print quant-ph/0003101.
29. A. Acín, D. Bruß, M. Lewenstein, and A. Sanpera, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 040401 (2001).
30. R.A. Horn and C.R. Johnson, Matrix Analysis (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985).