Classification of multipartite entangled states by multidimensional determinants

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 67, Issue 1, 2003, Pages

  Miyake, Akimasa ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; DATA PROCESSING; GROUND STATE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; PROBABILITY;

MIXED STATES; MULTIDIMENSIONAL DETERMINANTS; MULTIPARTITE ENTANGLED STATES; QUANTUM CORRELATION; QUBIT;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 0037243640     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. A. Peres, Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods (Kluwer Academic Dordrecht, 1995).
2. C.H. Bennett, H.J. Bernstein, S. Popescu, and B. Schumacher, Phys. Rev. A 53, 2046 (1996)
3. M. Murao et al., ibid. 57, R4075 (1998).
4. M.A. Nielsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 436 (1999)
5. G. Vidal, ibid. 83, 1046 (1999).
6. C.H. Bennett et al., Phys. Rev. A 63, 012307 (2000).
7. W. Dür, G. Vidal, and J.I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. A 62, 062314 (2000).
8. SLOCC was tied to SL × SL in Ref. [5]. Since we treat |Ψ> as a ray, i.e., an un-normalized vector, we rather relate SLOCC to GL × GL.
9. The local rank can also be defined as the rank of the reduced density matrix traced out for all except one party. Note that this definition is applicable to the multipartite case.
10. H.K. Lo and S. Popescu, Phys. Rev. A 63, 022301 (2001).
11. N. Linden and S. Popescu, Fortschr. Phys. 46, 567 (1998)
12. A. Acín et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1560 (2000)
13. H.A. Carteret, A. Higuchi, and A. Sudbery, J. Math. Phys. 41, 7932 (2000).
14. The tensor rank means the number of terms in the minimal decomposition of |Ψ> in Eq. (3) by separable states. It coincides with the local rank the bipartite case.
15. A. Acín, D. Bruß, M. Lewenstein, and A. Sanpera, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 040401 (2001).
16. J.-L. Brylinski, e-print quant-ph/0008031.
17. A. Miyake and M. Wadati, Phys. Rev. A 64, 042317 (2001)
18. D.C. Brody and L.P. Hughston, J. Geom. Phys. 38, 19 (2001)
19. I. Bengtsson, J. Brännlund, and K. Zyczkowski, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 17, 4675 (2002).
20. 3, so that it is separable (not genuine four-partite entangled).
21. I.M. Gelfand, M.M. Kapranov, and A.V. Zelevinsky, Adv. Math. 96, 226 (1992).
22. I.M. Gelfand, M.M. Kapranov, and A.V. Zelevinsky, Discriminants, Resultants, and Multidimensional Determinants (Birkhäuser, Boston, 1994), Chap. 14.
23. S. Hill and W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 5022 (1997)
24. W.K. Wootters, ibid. 80, 2245 (1998).
25. V. Coffman, J. Kundu, and W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A 61, 052306 (2000).
26. L. Schläfli, Math Naturwiss. Klasse 4 (1852)
27. L. Schläfli, Gesammelte Abhandlungen (Birkhäuser-Verlag, Basel, 1953), Vol. 2, p. 9.
28. J. Weyman and A. Zelevinsky, Ann. Inst. Fourier 46, 591 (1996).
29. If there exists a noninvertible local operation between SLOCC orbits, some of the local ranks decrease. Note that the converse is generally not the case. However, in our examples in Sec. IV, we do find some noninvertible local operations for the decrease of local ranks.
30. M. Koashi, V. Bužek, and N. Imoto, Phys. Rev. A 62, 050302(R) (2000).
31. F. Verstraete, J. Dehaene, B. De Moor, and H. Verschelde, Phys. Rev. A 65, 052112 (2002).
32. N. Gisin and H. Bechmann-Pasquinucci, Phys. Lett. A 246, 1 (1998), and references therein.
33. S. Wu and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. A 63, 012308 (2000).
34. D. Jonathan and M.B. Plenio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3566 (1999)
35. F. Morikoshi, ibid. 84, 3189 (2000).
36. n is invariant up to sign under permutations of the parties.
37. B.M. Terhal and P. Horodecki, Phys. Rev. A 61, 040301(R) (2000)
38. A. Sanpera, D. Bruß, and M. Lewenstein, ibid. 63, 050301(R) (2001).