A ruthenium olefin metathesis catalyst with a four-membered N-heterocyclic carbene ligand

Organometallics

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 338-340

  Despagnet Ayoub, Emmanuelle ^a   Grubbs, Robert H ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOND DISTANCES; LIGANDS; METATHESIS REACTIONS; STERIC HINDRANCE;

CATALYSTS; COMPLEXATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; RUTHENIUM; SINGLE CRYSTALS; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

OLEFINS;

EID: 13444272137     PISSN: 02767333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/om049092h     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. (a) Irvin, K. J.; Mol, J. C. Olefin Metathesis and Metathesis Polymerization; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, 1997.
2. (b) Grubbs, R. H.; Pine, S. H. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M., Ed.; Pergamon: New York, 1991, Vol. 5, Chapter 9.3.
3. Articles on molybdenum catalysts: (a) Schrock, R. R.; Murdzek, J. S.; Bazan, G. C.; Bobbins, J.; Dimare, M.; O'Regan, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 3875-3886.
4. (b) Schrock, R. R. Acc. Chem. Res. 1990, 23, 158-165. For recent reviews on applications of ruthenium-based catalysts:
5. (c) Trnka, T. M.; Grubbs, R. H. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 18-2.
6. (d) Fürstner, A. Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 3140-3172; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3012-3043.
7. (d) Fürstner, A. Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 3140-3172; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3012-3043.
8. (e) Grubbs, R. H.; Chang, S. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 4413-4450.
9. Schwab, P.; Grubbs, R. H.; Ziller, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 100-110.
10. (a) Scholl, M.; Ding, S.; Lee, C. W.; Grubbs, R. H. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 953-956.
11. (b) Choi, T.-L.; Chatterjee, A. K.; Grubbs, R. H. Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 1317-1319; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 1277-1279.
12. (b) Choi, T.-L.; Chatterjee, A. K.; Grubbs, R. H. Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 1317-1319; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 1277-1279.
13. (c) Chatterjee, A. K; Morgan, J. P.; Scholl, M.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3783-3784.
14. (d) Bielwaski, C. W.; Grubbs, R. H. Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 3025-3028; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2903-2906.
15. (d) Bielwaski, C. W.; Grubbs, R. H. Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 3025-3028; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2903-2906.
16. Garber, S. B.; Kingsbury, J. S.; Gray, B. L.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8168-8179.
17. Huang, I.; Schanz, H.-J.; Stevens, E. D.; Nolan, S. P. Organometallics 1999, 18, 2370-2375.
18. (a) Dinger, M. B.; Nieczypor, P.; Mol, J. C. Organometallics 2003, 22, 5291-5296.
19. (b) Seiders, T. J.; Ward, D. W.; Grubbs, R. H. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3225-3228.
20. (c) Fürstner, A.; Ackermann, L.; Gabor, B.; Goddard, R.; Lehmann, C. W.; Mynott, R.; Steltzer, F.; Thiel, O. R. Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7, 3236-3253.
21. (d) Jafarpour, L.; Stevens, E. D.; Nolan, S. P. J. Organomet. Chem. 2000, 606, 49-54.
22. (e) Ackermann, L.; Fürstner, A.; Weskamp, T.; Kohl, F. J.; Hermann, W. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 4787-4790.
23. (a) Bazinet, P.; Yap, G. P. A.; Richeson, D. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 13314-13315.
24. (b) Denk, K.; Sirach, P.; Herrmann, W. A. J. Organomet. Chem. 2002, 649, 219-224.
25. Yun, J.; Marinez, E. R.; Grubbs, R. H. Organometallics 2004, 23, 4172-4173.
26. Despagnet-Ayoub, E.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 10198-10199.
27. Kingsbury, J. S.; Harrity, J. P. A.; Bonitatebus, P. J., Jr.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 791-799.
28. int = 0.1018), 456 parameters, R1(I > 2σ(I)) = 0.0554, wR2(all data) - 0.0959.
29. 2.20 Crystallographic data have been deposited at the CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, U.K. and copies can be obtained on request, free of charge, by quoting the publication citation and the deposition numbers 243404 (5) and 247037 (analogue of 3).
30. carbone = 1.982-1.974 ̊).
31. Tolman, C. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 2953-2956.
32. Theoretical calculations on the free carbene showed the same behavior Su, M.-D.; Chu, S.-Y. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999, 308, 283-288.
33. Conversion is determined by GC spectroscopy with tridecane as standard.
34. 1H NMR.
35. In comparison with complex 2, a smaller PDI was obtained when the reaction was run neat. This can be attributed to a slowergelling process (complex 2, 30 min; complex 5,6 h) that favors better diffusion inside the sample.
36. Sheldrick, G. M. Acta Crytallogr. 1990, A46, 467.
37. Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXL-97: Program for Crystal Structure Refinement; University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany, 1997.
38. Courchay, F. C.; Sworen, J. C.; Wagener, K. B. Macromolecules 2003, 36, 8231-8239.