Short-term plasticity of the visuomotor map during grasping movements in humans

Learning and Memory

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 67-74

  Säfström, Daniel ^a   Edin, Benoni B ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GRIP STRENGTH; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; LINEAR SYSTEM; MALE; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; OBJECT RELATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALGORITHMS; FEMALE; FINGERS; HAND; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; ORIENTATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SIZE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 13444270489     PISSN: 10720502     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/lm.83005     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Baraduc, P. and Wolpert, D.M. 2002. Adaptation to a visuomotor shift depends on the starting posture. J. Neurophysiol. 88: 973-981.
2. Bedford, F.L. 1989. Constraints on learning new mappings between perceptual dimensions. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 15: 232-248.
3. _. 1993. Perceptual and cognitive spatial learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 19: 517-530.
4. Bott, L. and Heit, E. 2004. Nonmonotonic extrapolation in function learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 30: 38-50.
5. Clower, D.M. and Boussaoud, D. 2000. Selective use of perceptual recalibration versus visuomotor skill acquisition. J. Neurophysiol. 84: 2703-2708.
6. Colby, C.L. and Goldberg, M.E. 1999. Space and attention in parietal cortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 22: 319-349.
7. DeLosh, E.L., Busemeyer, J.R., and McDaniel, M.A. 1997. Extrapolation: The sine qua non for abstraction in function learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 23: 968-986.
8. Epstein, W. 1975. Recalibration by pairing: A process of perceptual learning. Perception 4: 59-72.
9. Gentilucci, M., Daprati, E., Toni, I., Chieffi, S., and Saetti, M.C. 1995. Unconscious updating of grasp motor program. Exp. Brain Res. 105: 291-303.
10. Ghahramani, Z. and Wolpert, D.M. 1997. Modular decomposition in visuomotor learning. Nature 386: 392-395.
11. Guigon, E. and Baraduc, P. 2002. A neural model of perceptual-motor alignment. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 14: 538-549.
12. Held, R. 1961. Exposure-history as a factor in maintaining stability of perception and coordination. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 132: 26-32.
13. Jakobson, L.S. and Goodale, M.A. 1991. Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: A kinematic analysis of human prehension. Exp. Brain Res. 86: 199-208.
14. Jeannerod, M. 1984. The timing of natural prehension movements. J. Mot. Behav. 16: 235-254.
15. Kitazawa, S., Kimura, T., and Uka, T. 1997. Prism adaptation of reaching movements: Specificity for the velocity of reaching. J. Neurosci. 17: 1481-1492.
16. Koh, K. and Meyer, D.E. 1991. Function learning: Induction of continuous stimulus-response relations. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 17: 811-836.
17. Marteniuk, R.G., Leavitt, J.L., MacKenzie, C.L., and Athénes, S. 1990. Functional relationships between grasp and transport components in a prehension task. Hum. Mov. Sci. 9: 149-176.
18. Martin, T.A., Keating, J.G., Goodkin, H.P., Bastian, A.J., and Thach, W.T. 1996. Throwing while looking through prisms. II. Specificity and storage of multiple gaze-throw calibrations. Brain 119: 1199-1211.
19. Pouget, A. and Snyder, L.H. 2000. Computational approaches to sensorimotor transformations. Nat. Neurosci. 3 Suppl: 1192-1198.
20. Säfström, D. and Edin, B.B. 2004. Task requirements influence sensory integration during grasping in humans. Learn. Mem. 11: 356-363.
21. Sandström, G., Backström, A., and Olsson, K.A. 1996. REMAC: A video-based motion analyser interfacing to an existing flexible sampling system. J. Neurosci. Methods 69: 205-211.
22. Vetter, P., Goodbody, S.J., and Wolpert, D.M. 1999. Evidence for an eye-centered spherical representation of the visuomotor map. J. Neurophysiol. 81: 935-939.
23. Welch, R.B. 1978. Perceptual modification. Academic Press, New York.
24. Wing, A.M., Turton, A., and Fraser, C. 1986. Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. J. Mol. Behav. 18: 245-260.