Task requirements influence sensory integration during grasping in humans

Learning and Memory

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 356-363

  Säfström, Daniel ^a   Edin, Benoni B ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERROR; HAND GRIP; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; INTEGRATION; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SENSORY SYSTEM; TACTILE DISCRIMINATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL INFORMATION; WEIGHT BEARING;

ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; HAND; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT; PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUES;

EID: 2542555123     PISSN: 10720502     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/lm.71804     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aglioti, S., DeSouza, J.F., and Goodale, M.A. 1995. Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Curr. Biol. 5: 679-685.
2. Birznieks, I., Jenmalm, P., Goodwin, A.W., and Johansson, R.S. 2001. Encoding of direction of fingertip forces by human tactile afferents. J. Neurosci. 21: 8222-8237.
3. Clark, J.J. and Yuille, A.L. 1990. Data fitsion for sensory information processing systems. Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA.
4. Ernst, M.O. and Banks, M.S. 2002. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415: 429-433.
5. Ernst, M.O., Banks, M.S., and Bülthoff, H.H. 2000. Touch can change visual slant perception. Nat. Neurosci. 3: 69-73.
6. Fernàndez-Ruiz, J. and Díaz, R. 1999. Prism adaptation and aftereffect: Specifying the properties of a procedural memory system. Learn. Mem. 6: 47-53.
7. Flanagan, J.R. and Johansson, R.S. 2003. Action plans used in action observation. Nature 424: 769-771.
8. Gentilucci, M., Daprati, E., Toni, I., Chieffi, S., and Saetti, M.C. 1995. Unconscious updating of grasp motor program. Exp. Brain. Res. 105: 291-303.
9. Hillis, J.M., Ernst, M.O., Banks, M.S., and Landy, M.S. 2002. Combining sensory information: Mandatory fusion within, but not between, senses. Science 298: 1627-1630.
10. Hu, Y. and Goodale, M.A. 2000. Grasping after a delay shifts size-scaling from absolute to relative metrics. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12: 856-868.
11. Iberall, T., Bingham, G., and Arbib, M. 1986. Opposition space as a structuring concept for the analysis of skilled hand movements. In Generation and modulation of action patterns. (eds. H. Heuer and C. Fromm), pp. 158-173. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
12. Jakobson, L.S. and Goodale, M.A. 1991. Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: A kinematic analysis of human prehension. Exp. Brain Res. 86: 199-208.
13. Jeannerod, M. 1984. The timing of natural prehension movements. J. Mot. Behav. 16: 235-254.
14. Jenmalm, P. and Johansson, R.S. 1997. Visual and somatosensory information about object shape control manipulative fingertip forces. J. Neurosci. 17: 4486-4499.
15. Johansson, R.S. 1998. Sensory input and control of grip. Novartis Foundation Symp. 218: 45-59.
16. Johansson, R.S., Westling, G., Backstrom, A., and Flanagan, J.R. 2001. Eye-hand coordination in object manipulation. J. Neurosci. 21: 6917-6932.
17. Kennett, S., Taylor-Clarke, M., and Haggard, P. 2001. Noninformative vision improves the spatial resolution of touch in humans. Curr. Biol. 11: 1188-1191.
18. Lackner, J.R. and Dizio, P. 1994. Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory. J. Neurophys. 72: 299-313.
19. Land, M.F. and Hayhoe, M. 2001. In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities? Vision Res. 41: 3559-3565.
20. Marteniuk, R.G., Leavitt, J.L., MacKenzie, C.L., and Athènes, S. 1990. Functional relationships between grasp and transport components in a prehension task. Hum. Mov. Sci. 9: 149-176.
21. Newport, R., Hindle, J.V., and Jackson, S.R. 2001. Links between vision and somatosensation. Vision can improve the felt position of the unseen hand. Curr. Biol. 11: 975-980.
22. Newport, R., Rabb, B., and Jackson, S.R. 2002. Noninformative vision improves haptic spatial perception. Curr. Biol. 12: 1661-1664.
23. Rabin, E., Bortolami, S.B., DiZio, P., and Lackner, J.R. 1999. Haptic stabilization of posture: Changes in arm proprioception and cutaneous feedback for different arm orientations. J. Neurophysiol. 82: 3541-3549.
24. Sainburg, R.L., Poizner, H., and Ghez, C. 1993. Loss of proprioception produces deficits in interjoint coordination. J. Neurophysiol. 70: 2136-2147.
25. Sandström, G., Bäckström, A., and Olsson, K.A. 1996. REMAC: A video-based motion analyser interfacing to an existing flexible sampling system. J. Neurosci. Meth. 69: 205-211.
26. Smeets, J.B. and Brenner, E. 2001. Independent movements of the digits in grasping. Exp. Brain. Res. 139: 92-100.
27. van Beers, R.J., Sittig, A.C., and Gon, J.J. 1999. Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: An experimentally supported model. J. Neurophysiol. 81: 1355-1364.
28. van Beers, R.J., Wolpert, D.M., and Haggard, P. 2002. When feeling is more important than seeing in sensorimotor adaptation. Curr. Biol. 12: 834-837.
29. Welch, R.B. 1978. Perceptual modification. Academic Press, New York.
30. Wing, A.M., Turton, A., and Fraser, C. 1986. Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. J. Mot. Behav. 18: 245-260.