National Board Certified teachers and their students' achievement

Education Policy Analysis Archives

Volumn 12, Issue , 2004, Pages 1-117

  Vandevoort, Leslie G ^a,b,c,d   Amrein Beardsley, Audrey ^a,e,f   Berliner, David C ^{a,g,h,i,j,k,l}  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Kyrene School District   (United States)

^c MUSKINGUM COLLEGE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^e ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY WEST   (United States)

^f Div Educ Leadership Plcy Studs   (United States)

^g STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

ⁱ American Educational Research Association   (United States)

^j AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION   (United States)

^k Ctr Adv Stud in the Behav Sci   (United States)

^l National Academy of Education   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 13444257528     PISSN: 10682341     EISSN: 10682341     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Ballou, D. (1998, June 10). Some unanswered questions concerning National Board Certification of teachers. Education Week on the WEB, Retrieved June 25, 2004 from http://www.edweek.org/ew/ew_printstory.cfm?slug=39ballou.h17
2. Beldon, N. (2002). California teachers' perceptions of National Board Certification. Santa Cruz, CA: Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning.
3. Berg, J. H. (2003). Improving the quality of teaching through National Board Certification: Theory and Practice. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon publishers
4. Berliner, D. C. (1994a). Expertise: The wonders of exemplary performance. In John N. Mangieri and Cathy Collins Block (Eds.), Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students. Ft. Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
5. Berliner, David C. (1994b). Teacher expertise. In Torsten Husèn and T. Neville Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (2nd ed.)(Vol. 10, pp. 6020-6026). London: Pergamon.
6. Bond, L. (2001). Defrocking the National Board. A reply to Podgursky. Greensboro, North Carolina: Department of Educational Research Methodology & Center of Educational Research and Evaluation, University of North Carolina.
7. Bond, L., Jaeger, R. M., Smith, T. & Hattie, J. A. (2000). Accomplished teaching validation study. Retrieved March 3, 2001, from http://new.nbpts.org/Press/exec_summary.pdf
8. Bond, L., Smith, T., Baker, W. K. & Hattie, J. A. (2000, September). The certification system of the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards: A construct validity study. Greensboro, North Carolina: Center for Educational Research and Evaluation, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
9. Buday, M., & Kelly, J. (1996). National Board certification and the teaching professions commitment to quality assurance. Phi Delta Kappan, 78 (3), 215-219.
10. Burroughs, R., Schwartz, T. A. & Hendricks-Lee, M. (2000, February). Communities of practice and discourse communities: Negotiating boundaries in NBPTS certification. Teachers College Record, 102 (2), 344-374.
11. st century, the report of the Task Force on Teaching as a Profession. Washington, DC: Author.
12. Castor, B. (2001). National Board certification: Vital, rigorous and market driven. Retrieved July 2, 2004, from http://www.nbpts.org/pdf/ castor_commentary.pdf
13. nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: NJ.
14. Dagenhart, D. B. (2002). Comparing the wants and needs of National Board Certified with non-National Board Certified middle school teachers for personal job success and satisfaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, College of Education, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
15. Ferguson, G. A. (1998). Teachers' perceptions and expectations and the black-white test score gap (273-317). In C. Jenks and M. Phillips (Eds.), The black-white test score gap. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
16. Ferguson, G.A. & Takane, Y. (1989). Statistical analysis in psychology and education. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
17. Finn, Jr., C. E. & Wilcox, D. D (1999, August 9). Board games: Failure of the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards to accomplish objective of improving quality of teaching in the US; Business backs a losing education strategy. Retrieved June 30, 2004, from http://www.edexcellence.net/ foundation/publication/publication.cfm?id=161
18. Finn, Jr., C. E. & Wilcox, D. D. (2000, January 13). Teachers should be graded on how well their students are learning. Retrieved June 21, 2004, from http://www.edexcellence.net/foundation/publication/publication.cfm?id=102
19. Fordham Foundation (1999). The teachers we need and how to get them. Retrieved June 25, 2004 from http://www.edexcellence.net/foundation/publication/ publication.cfm?id=-16
20. rd Ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
21. Fuhrman, S. (2002, September 13). Synthesis of reviews of "The value-added achievement gains of NBPTS-certified teachers in Tennessee: A brief report." Retrieved on July 10, 2003, from http://ecs.org/html/special/ nbpts/Panel Report.htm
22. Glass, G. V (2002). Teacher characteristics. In A. Molnar (Ed.), School reform proposals: the research evidence (Chapter 8). Retrieved June 30, 2004 from http://www.asu.edu/educ/epsl/EPRU/documents/EPRU 2002-101/Chapter 08-Glass-Final.htm
23. Glass, G. V (2004, April). Teacher Evaluation (Policy Brief, EPSL-0401-112-EPRU). Tempe, AZ: Education Policy Studies Laboratory, College of Education, Arizona State University. Retrieved June 17, 2004, from http://edpolicylab.org
24. rd Ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
25. Goldhaber, D. (2002). The mastery of good teaching: Surveying the evidence on student achievement and teacher characteristics. Education Next, 2 (1), 50-55.
26. Goldhaber, D. & Anthony, E. (2004). Can teacher quality be effectively assessed? Retrieved on June 24, 2004, from www.crpe.org/ workingpapers/pdf/NBPTSquality_report.pdf
27. Goldhaber, D. D. & Brewer, D. J. (2000). Does teacher certification matter? High school teacher certification status and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22 (2), 129-145.
28. Goldhaber, D. D. & Brewer, D. J. (1996). Evaluating the effects of teacher degree level on educational performance. Developments in School Finance 1996. Retrieved July 18, 2001, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs97/975351.html
29. Hanushek, E. A. (1992). The trade-off between child quantity and quality. Journal of Political Economy, 100(1), 84-117.
30. Haycock, K. (1998, Summer). Good teaching matters... a lot. Retrieved July 2, 2004, from http://www2.edtrust.org/NR/rdonlyres/0279CB4F-B729-4260-AB6E- 359FD3C374A7/0/k16_summer98.pdf
31. Holland, R. (2002, December). National teacher certification: Advancing quality or perpetuating mediocrity? Retrieved June 30, 2004 from http://www.lexingtoninstitute.org
32. Indiana National Standards Board (2002, Spring). Status of National Board Certified Teachers in Indiana. Retrieved June 30, 2004 from http://www.nbpts.org/pdf/indianapaper.pdf
33. Iovacchini, L. C. (1998). National Board for Professional Teaching Standards: What teachers are learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, College of Education, University of South Carolina, Columbia.
34. Kearney, C. P. (2000, November 8). National board certification: An underutilized resource for New York State? Paper presented at the Education Finance Research Consortium, Symposium on the Teaching Workforce, Albany, New York. Retrieved June 30, 2004 from: http://www.albany.edu/edfin/symp2000/ KearneyW3.pdf
35. Kupermintz, H. (2003). Teacher effects and teacher effectiveness: A validity investigation of the Tennessee Value Added Assessment System. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(3), 287-298.
36. Kupermintz, H. (2002). Value-Added Assessment of Teachers, In Molnar, A. (Ed.) School Reform Proposals: The Research Evidence. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
37. Laczko-Kerr, I., & Berliner, D. C. (2002, September 6). The effectiveness of "Teach for America" and other under-certified teachers on student academic achievement: A case of harmful public policy, Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10 (37). Retrieved June 24, 2004 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n37
38. Leef, G. C. (2003). National Board certification: Is North Carolina getting its money's worth? Raleigh, NC: John Locke Foundation Inc.
39. Margolis, J. (2004, February 19). A response to the National Board hoax. Teachers College Record. Retrieved June 30, 2004 from http://www.tcrecord.org/ PrintContent.asp?ContentID=11277
40. Moss P. A., Sutherland, L. M., Haniford, L., Miller, R., Johnson, D., Geist, P.K., Koziol, S.M., Star, J.R., & Pecheone, R. L., (2004, July 20). Interrogating the generalizability of portfolio assessments of beginning teachers: A qualitative study, Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(32). Retrieved August 22, 2004 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n32/.
41. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (no date). About NBPTS/History & facts. Looking back at our roots: Early days, critical players. Retrieved June 26, 2004 from http://www.nbpts.org/about/lookingback.cfm
42. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards, (1989). Toward high and rigorous standards for the teaching profession: Initial policies and perspectives of the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. Detroit: Author.
43. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (2001). National Board Certification® candidate survey. Retrieved September 10, 2002, from http://www.nbpts.org/research/archive_3.cfm?id=9
44. O'Connor, K. A. Identifying the wants and needs of North Carolina upper elementary (Grades 3-5) National Board and non-National Board teachers for job success and satisfaction. Ann Arbor, MI: Proquest Information and Learning Company.
45. Petty, T. M. (2002). Identifying the wants and needs of North Carolina high school mathematics teachers for job success and satisfaction. Ann Arbor, MI: Proquest Information and Learning Company.
46. Petrosky, A. R. (1994). Schizophrenia, the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards' policies and me. Retrieved February 9, 2003, from http://www.dil.sched.pitt.edu/people/faculty/Petrosky/Schizophrenia.html
47. Petrosky, A. R. (1998, July). Insiders and outsiders: Teaching standards, national certification assessment, and professional development. English in Australia, 122, Retrieved June 29, 2004 from http://www.aate.org.au/E_in_A/ July98/982petro.html
48. Podgursky, M. (2001). Defrocking the National Board. Education Next, 1 (2), 79-82.
49. Podgursky, M. (2001, April 11). Should states subsidize national certification? Education Week on the WEB, Retrieved June 23, 2004 from http://www.edweek.org/ew/ewstory.cfm?slug=30podgursky.h20
50. Podgursky, M. (2001, Fall). Education Matters rejoinders to Wenglinsky and Bond. Retrieved June 30, 2004 from http://www.educationnext.org/unabridged/ 20013/letter-pod.html
51. Pool, J. E., Ellett, C. E., Schiavone, S. & Carey-Lewis, C. (2001). How valid are the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards assessments for predicting the quality of actual classroom teaching and learning? Results of six mini case studies. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 15 (1), 31-48.
52. Ralph, D. E. (2003). National Board Certified Teachers' views of the certification process and its effect on the professional school culture. Ann Arbor, MI: Proquest Information and Learning Company.
53. Rapp, D. (2001). Ohio teachers give tests an 'F.' Rethinking Schools, 15 (4). Retrieved July 1, 2004 from:http://www.rethinkingschools.org/archive/15_04/ Ohio154.shtml
54. Remark Web Survey (Version 2.0). (2002, January). [Computer software]. Paoli, PA: Principia Products.
55. Sato, M. (2000, April). The national Board for professional teaching standards; Teacher learning through the assessment process. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans , LA. Retrieved June 30, 2004 from http://nbrc.stanford.edu/research/learning.pdf
56. Sato, M., Hyler, M. E., & Monte-Sano, C. (2002, April). The National Board certification process and its impact on teacher leadership. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. Retrieved July 2, 2004 from http://nbrc.stanford. edu/research/leadership.pdf
57. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
58. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Education Review, 57, 1-22.
59. Shulman, L. S. and Quinlan, K. M. (1995). The comparative psychology of school subjects. In D. C. Berliner and R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 399-422). New York: Macmillan.
60. Schutz, A. & Moss, P.A., (2004, July 20). Reasonable decisions in portfolio assessment: Evaluating complex evidence of teaching, Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(33). Retrieved August 22, 2004 from http://epaa.asu.edu/ epaa/v12n33/.
61. Smith, M.L, & Glass, G.V. (1987). Research and evaluation in education and the social sciences. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
62. Stanford Achievement Test-9: Administrator's interpretive guide. (2001). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
63. Stephens, A. D. (2003, September). The relationship between National Board certification for teachers and student achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, College of Education, University of South Carolina, Columbia.
64. Sternberg, R. J. & Horvath, J. A. (1995). A prototype of expert teaching. Educational Researcher, 24, 9-17.
65. Stone, J. E. (2004). National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS): Improving education at a snail's pace. Retrieved June 23, 2004 from http://www.education-consumers.com/Urban-Inst1.asp
66. Stone, J. E. (2002). The value-added achievement gains of NBPTS-certified teachers in Tennessee: A brief report. Retrieved June 30, 2004, from http://www. education-consumers.com/briefs/stoneNBPTS.shtm
67. Taylor, G. (2000). Teacher change and the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards: A case study of eleven Colorado teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, College of Education, University of Colorado, Boulder.
68. Thirunarayanan, M. O. (2004, February 10). National Board certification for teachers: A billion dollar hoax. Teachers College Record. Retrieved June 24, 2004 from http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentID=11266
69. Turchi, L. B. (1996). Teacher classroom inquiry: Activities, thinking, reflective stances and collaboration embedded in the assessment of accomplished teaching by the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, College of Education, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina.
70. U. S. Department of Education (2003). Meeting the highly qualified teacher challenge. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved June 26, 2004 from http://www.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/teachprep/2003title-ii-report.pdf
71. United States Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983, April). A nation at risk. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved January 27, 2002, from http://www.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/risk.html
72. Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D. & Verloop, N. (2001) Professional development and reform in science teaching: The role of teachers' practical knowledge. Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 38, 2, 137-155.
73. Whitman, B. A. (2002, October). Professional teachers for quality education: Characteristics of teachers certified by the Board for Professional Teaching Standards. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.