When Memory Shifts Toward More Typical Category Exemplars: Accentuation Effects in the Recollection of Ethnically Ambiguous Faces

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 86, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 236-250

  Corneille, Olivier ^a,c   Huart, Johanne ^a   Becquart, Emilie ^a,b   Brédart, Serge ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^c FNRS   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ETHNIC GROUP; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEMORY; PERCEPTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECALL;

ADULT; ETHNIC GROUPS; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MENTAL RECALL; SOCIAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 1342325063     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.236     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
2. Begg, I. M., Anas, A., & Farinacci, S. (1992). Dissociation of process in belief: Source recollection, statement familiarity, and the illusion of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 446-458.
3. Blair, I. V., Judd, C. M., Sadler, M. S., & Jenkins, C. (2002). The role of Afrocentric features in person perception: Judging by features and categories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 5-25.
4. Brewer, W. F., & Nakamura, G. V. (1984). The nature and functions of schemas. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 119-160). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Corneille, O., Klein, O., Lambert, S., & Judd, C. M. (2002). On the role of familiarity with units of measurement in producing categorical accentuation: Tajfel and Wilkes (1963) revisited and replicated. Psychological Science, 4, 380-383.
6. Dodson, C. S., Johnson, M. K., & Schooler, J. W. (1997). The verbal overshadowing effect: Why descriptions impair face recognition. Memory and Cognition, 25, 129-139.
7. Eberhardt, J. L., Dasgupta, N., & Banaszynski, T. L. (2003). Believing is seeing: The effect of racial labels and implicit beliefs on face perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 360-370.
8. Fiedler, K. (1993). Constructive processes in person cognition. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 349-364.
9. Fiedler, K., Armbruster, T., Nickel, S., Walther, E., & Asbeck, J. (1996). Constructive biases in social judgment: Experiments on the self-verification of question contents. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 861-873.
10. Furl, N., Phillips, J. P., & O'Toole, A. J. (2002). Face recognition algorithms and the other-race effect: Computational mechanisms for a developmental contact hypothesis. Cognitive Science, 26, 797-815.
11. Going, M., & Read, J. D. (1974). The effect of uniqueness, sex of subject, and sex of photograph on facial recognition. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 39, 109-110.
12. Gryphon Software Corporation. (1992-1994). Morph TM 2.5 [Computer software]. San Diego, CA: Author.
13. Halberstadt, J. B., & Niedenthal, P. M. (2001). Effects of emotion concepts on perceptual memory for emotional expression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 587-598.
14. Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133-168). New York: Guilford Press.
15. Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Duncan, S. (1988). Categories and particulars: Prototype effects in the estimating spatial location. Psychological Review, 98, 352-376.
16. Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (2000). Why do categories affect stimulus judgment? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 220-241.
17. Klauer, K. C., & Wegener, I. (1998). Unraveling social categorization in the "Who said what?" paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1155-1178.
18. Kuhl, P. K. (1991). Human adults and human infants show a perceptual magnet effect for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception and Psychophysics, 50, 93-107.
19. Lenton, A. P., Blair, I. V., & Hastie, R. (2001). Illusions of gender: Stereotypes evoke false memories. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 3-14.
20. Levin, D. T. (2000). Race as a visual feature: Using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 559-574.
21. Levin, D. T., & Beale, J. M. (2000). Categorical perception occurs in newly learned faces, other-race faces, and inverted faces. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 386-401.
22. Levy, S. R., Plaks, J. E., & Dweck, C. S. (1999). Modes of social thought: Implicit theories and social understanding. In S. Chaiken & T. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 179-202). New York: Guilford Press.
23. Livingston, R. W., & Brewer, M. B. (2002). What are we really priming? Cue-based versus category-based processing of facial stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 5-18.
24. Loftus, E. F. (1975). Leading questions and the eyewitness report. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 560-572.
25. Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., & Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 19-31.
26. Loftus, E. F., & Palmer, J. P. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 585-589.
27. MacLin, O. H., & Malpass, R, S. (2001), Racial categorization of faces: The ambiguous race face effect. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 98-118.
28. Macrae, C. N., Schloerscheidt, A. M., Bodenhausen, G. V., & Milne, A. B. (2002). Creating memory illusions: Expectancy-based processing and the generation of false memories. Memory, 10, 63-80.
29. Maddox, K. B., & Gray, S. A. (2002). Cognitive representations of Black Americans: Reexploring the role of skin tone. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 250-259.
30. Malpass, R. S., & Kravitz, J. (1969). Recognition for faces of own and other races. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 333-334.
31. Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353-363.
32. Quinn, P. C. (2000). Perceptual reference points for form and orientation in young infants: Anchors or magnets? Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 1625-1633.
33. Reber, R., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth. Consciousness and Cognition, 8, 338-342.
34. Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (2000). Distortions of memory. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 149-162). New York: Oxford University Press.
35. Rosch, E. H. (1975), Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 532-547.
36. Shaw, J. S., III, (1996). Increases in eyewitness confidence resulting from postevent questioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 126-146.
37. Tajfel, H., & Wilkes, A. L. (1963). Classification and quantitative judgment. British Journal of Psychology, 54, 101-114.
38. Taylor, S. E., Fiske, S. T., Etcoff, N, L., & Ruderman, A. (1978). Solo status as a psychological variable: The power of being distinctive, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 778-793.
39. Technical Working Group for Eyewitness Evidence. (1999). Eyewitness evidence: A guide for law enforcement. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
40. Trope, Y. (1986). Identification and inferential process in dispositional attribution. Psychological Review, 93, 239-257.
41. Trope, Y., & Cohen, O. (1989). Perceptual and inferential determinants of behavior-correspondent attributions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 142-158.
42. Trope, Y., Cohen, O., & Maoz, Y. (1988). The perceptual and inferential effects of situational inducements on dispositional attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 165-177.
43. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352.
44. Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 43, 4161-4204.
45. Valentine, T., & Bruce, V. (1986a). The effect of distinctiveness in recognizing and classifying faces, Perception, 15, 525-535.
46. Valentine, T., & Bruce, V. (1986b). Recognizing familiar faces: The role of distinctiveness and familiarity. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40, 300-305.
47. Wells, G. L. (1984). The psychology of lineup identifications. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14, 89-103.
48. Wells, G. L., Small, M., Penrod, S., Malpass, R. S., Fulera, S. M., & Brimascombe, C. A. E. (1998). Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for lineups and photospreads, Law and Human Behavior, 22, 1-39.
49. Wilson, T. D., & Brekke, N, (1994), Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 116,117-142.