Comparative study of representation structures for modeling function and behavior of mechanical devices

Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2001, Pages 165-178

  Summers, Joshua D ^a   Vargas Hernández, Noé ^a   Zhao, Zuozhi ^a   Shah, Jami J ^a   Lacroix, Zoé ^b  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Arizona State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER AIDED ENGINEERING; DECISION MAKING; GRAPH THEORY; PROBLEM SOLVING; PRODUCT DESIGN; USER INTERFACES; CONCEPTUAL DESIGN; DESIGN FOR MANUFACTURABILITY; FORMAL LANGUAGES;

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN; MECHANICAL DEVICES; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; DESIGN FOR MANUFACTURING; EMBODIMENT DESIGN; ENGINEERING DESIGN; FUNCTION REPRESENTATIONS; HYBRID REPRESENTATIONS; MECHANICAL DEVICE; MODEL FUNCTIONS;

MECHANICAL CONTROL EQUIPMENT; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN;

EID: 1342281466     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (64)

1. Al-Hakim, L., Kusiak, A., Mathem, J., 2000, "A Graph-Theoretic Approach to Conceptual Design with Functional Perspectives", Computer Aided Design, vol. 32, pp. 867-75.
2. Baxter, J., Juster, N., de Pennington, A., 1994, "A Functional Data Model for Assemblies used to Verify Product Design Specifications", Proceedings of the Institution for Mechanical Engineers, Part B - Journal of Engineering Manufacture, vol. 208, pp. 235-44.
3. Bettig, B., Shah, J., 1998, "A Unified Representation of Geometric Constraint Problems to Support Design and Manufacturing Applications", Proceedings of DETC98, ASME, DETC98/DAC-5627, Atlanta, GA.
4. Bettig, B., 1999, "A Graph-Based Geometric Problem Solving System for Mechanical Design and Manufacturing", Ph.D. Dissertation, Arizona State University.
5. Bettig, B., Shah, J., Summers, J., 2000a, "Domain Independent Characterization of Parametric and Geometric Problems in Embodiment Design", Proceedings of DETC2000, ASME, DETC00/DAC-14259, Baltimore, MD
6. Bettig, B., Summers, J., Shah, J., 2000b, "Geometric Exemplars: A Bridge Between CAD and AI", Knowledge Intensive CAD, IFIP 5.2, KIC-4, Parma, Italy, KIC-17.
7. Blostein, D., Fahmy, H., Grbavec, A., 1994, "Issues in the Practical Use of Graph Rewriting", Graph Grammars and Their Application to Computer Science, Springer Verlag, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 38-55.
8. Blundell, A., 1982, Bond Graphs for Modelling Engineering Systems, John Wiley & Sons Publishers, Chichester, U. K.
9. Brown, D., Chandrasekaran, B., 1986, "Knowledge and Control for Mechanical Design Expert System", IEEE Computer, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 92-100.
10. Brown, N., McMahon, C., Sims-Williams, J., 1994, "A Formal Language for the Design of Manufacturable Objects", Formal Design Methods for CAD (B-18), ed. J. Gero and Tyugu, North Holland, pp. 135-55.
11. Cole, E., 1998, "Functional Analysis: A System Conceptual Design Tool", IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., New York, NY, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 354-65.
12. Collins, J., Hagan, B., Bratt, H., 1976, "The Failure-Experience Matrix - a Useful Design Tool", Journal of Engineering Industry, ASME, vol. 98, pp. 1074-9.
13. Du, X., Tseng, M., Jiao, J., 2000, "Graph Grammar Based Product Variety Modeling", Proceedings of DETC00, ASME, DETC00/DFM-14041, Baltimore, MD.
14. Das, D., Gupta, S., Regli, W., Nau, D., 1995, "Automated Manufacturability Analysis: A Survey", Technical Report, (at http://www.isr.umd.edu/TechReports/ISR/1995/TR_95-14/TR_95-14.phtml, January 19, 2001).
15. Fitzhorn, P., 1990, "Language of Topologically Valid Bounding Manifolds", Computer Aided Design, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 407-16.
16. Freeman, P., Newell, A., 1971, "A Model for Functional Reasoning in Design", Proceedings of the Second IJCAI, pp. 621-40.
17. Gips, J., Stiny, G., 1972, "Shape Grammar's and the Generative Specification of Painting and Sculpture", Information Processing 71, C. Freiman (ed.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 1460-5.
18. Hashim, F., Juster, N., de Pennington, A., 1994, "A Functional Approach to Redesign", Engineering with Computers, University of Leeds, UK, vol. 10, pp. 125-139.
19. Hu, X., Pang, J., Pang, Y., Atwood, M., Sun, W., Regli, W., 2000, "A Survey of Design Rational: Representation, Capture, and Retrieval", Proceedings of the 2000 Design For Manufacturing Conference, DETC2000/DFM-14008, Baltimore, MD.
20. Hubka, V., Eder, W., 1984, Theory of Technical Systems, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
21. Hundal, M., 1990, "A Systematic Method for Developing Function Structures, Solutions, and Concept Variants", Mechanical Machine Theory, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 243-56.
22. Johnson, A., Thornton, A., 1991, "Towards Read CAD", Design Studies, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 232-6.
23. Karnopp, D., Margolis, D., Rosemberg, R., 2000, System Dynamics, Modeling and Simulation of Mechanical Systems, Ed. 3, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
24. Koch, P., Peplinski, J., Allen, J., Mistree, F., 1994, "A Method for Design Using Available Assets: Identifying a Feasible System Configuration", Behavior Science, vol. 30, pp. 229-50.
25. Kreowski, H., Rozonberg, G., 1990, "On Structured Graph Grammars", Information Sciences, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 185-210.
26. Kurfman, M., Stone, R., van Wie, M., Wood, K., Otto, K., 2000, "Theoretical Underpinnings of Functional Modeling: Preliminary Experimental Studies", Proceedings of the ASME DETC2000, DTM-14563, Baltimore, MD.
27. Lai, K., Wilson, W., 1989, "FDL - A Language for Function Description and Rationalization in Mechanical Design", Journal of Mechanisms, Transmissions, and Automation in Design, ASME, vol. 111 pp. 117-23.
28. Li, X., Schmidt, L., 2000, "Grammar-Based Designer Assistance Tool for Epicyclic Gear Trains", Proceedings of DETC00, ASME, DETC00/DTM-14574, Baltimore, MD.
29. Longenecker, S., Fitzhorn, P. 1991, "A Shape Grammar for Non-Manifold Modeling", Research in Design, vol. 2, pp. 159-70.
30. MathWorks, 2001, "MathWorks: SimuLink 4", http://www.mathworks.com/products/simulink/, April 17, 2001.
31. McAdams, D., Stone, R., Wood, K., 1998, "Understanding Product Similarity Using Customer Needs", Proceedings of ASME DETC98, ASME, DETC98/DTM-5660, Atlanta, GA.
32. Mitchell, T., Steinberg, L., Shulman, J., 1985, "A Knowledge-based Approach to Design", IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI-7, no. 5, pp. 502-10.
33. Orelup, M., Dixon, J., Simmons, M., 1987, "Dominic II: More Progress Towards Domain Independent Design by Iterative Redesign", Proceedings of ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Boston, MA.
34. Otto, K., Wood, K., 2000, Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering, Systematic Design, and New Product Development, Prentice-Hall, New York, NY
35. Pahl, G., Beitz, W., 1996, Engineering Design - A Systematic Approach, Springer, New York, NY.
36. Rangaraj, B., Thompson, J., Krishnaswami, P., 1992, "A Hybrid Computational Model for Mechanical Design", Computers in Engineering, vol. 1 Proceedings ASME 1992, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, pp.75 - 81.
37. Regli, W., 1999, "Digital Library Support for Engineering Design and Manufacturing", Proceedings of the 1999 Design For Manufacturing Conference, DETC99/CIE-9080, Las Vegas, NV.
38. Samantaray, A., 2001, "Switch Capsule", http://www.symbols2000.com/patchesns4.html#14, April 17, 2001.
39. Schemekel, H., Wingard, L., Kjellbeg, T., 1989, "A Discussion on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning in Intelligent CAD", Intelligent CAD, ed. H. Yoshikawa and D. Gossard, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, Netherlands, vol. 1, pp. 103-15.
40. Schiebeler, R., Ehrlenspiel, K., 1993, "REEK: A Knowledge Base System as an Integrated Design-Assistant", Design for Manufacturability, ASME Winter Annual Meeting, pp. 69-74.
41. Schmidt, L., Cagan, J., 1995, "Recursive Annealing: A Computational Model for Machine Design", Research in Engineering Design, vol. 7, pp. 102-25.
42. Schmidt, L., Cagan, J., 1998, "Optimal Configuration Design: An Integrated Approach Using Grammars", Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 120, no. 1, pp. 2-9.
43. Schmidt, L., Shi, H., Kerkar, S., 1999, "The Generation Gap: A CSP Approach Linking Function to Form Grammar Generation", Proceedings of DETC99, ASME, DETC99/DTM-048, Las Vegas, NV.
44. Schmidt, L., Shetty, H., Chase, S., 2000, "A Graph Grammar Approach for Structure Synthesis of Mechanisms", Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 122, no. 4, pp. 371-6.
45. Shah, J., Wright, P., 2000, "Developing Theoretical Foundations of DfM", Proceedings of the 2000 Design For Manufacturing Conference, DETC2000/DFM-14015, Baltimore, MD.
46. Shapiro, V., Voelcker, H., 1989, "On the Role of Geometry in Mechanical Design", Research in Engineering Design, vol. 1, pp. 69-73.
47. Shea, K., Cagan, J., 1997, "Innovative Dome Design: Applying Geodesic Patterns with Shape Annealing", Artificial Intelligence in Engineering Design, Analysis, and Manufacturing, vol. 11, pp. 379-94.
48. Shimomura, Y., Tanigawa, S., Takeda, H., Umeda, Y., Tomiyama, T., 1996, "Functional Evaluation Based on Function Content", Proceedings of the 1996 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, DETC96/DTM-1532, Irvine, CA.
49. Shimomura, Y., Yoshioka, M., Takeda, H., Umeda, Y., Tomiyama, T., 1998, "Representation of Design Object Based on the Functional Evolution Process Model", Journal of Mechanical Design Transactions of the ASME, June 1998, vol. 120, pp. 221-9.
50. Sinha, R., Paredis, C., Liang, V., Khosla, P., 2001, "Modeling and Simulation Methods for Design Engineering Systems", Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 84-91.
51. Sthanusubramonian, T., Rinderle, J., Finger, S., 1992, "A Transformational Approach to Configuration Design", Proceedings of the 1992 NSF Design and Manufacturing Systems Conference, NSF, pp. 419-24.
52. Stone, R., Wood, K., "Development of a Functional Basis for Design", Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 122, no.4, pp. 359-370.
53. Suh, N., 1990, Principles of Design, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
54. Symbols2000, 2001, "SYMBOLS 2000 - Netscape", http://www.symbols2000.com/indexns4.html, January 17, 2001.
55. Szykman, S., Sriram, R., Smith, S., 1998, Proceedings of the NIST Design Repository Workshop, Gaithersburg, MD, November 1996.
56. Szykman, S., Sriram, R., Smith, S., 1999, "The Representation of Function in Computer-Based Design", Proceedings of the 1999 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, DETC99/DTM-8742.
57. Thoma, J., 1975, Introduction to Bond Graphs and their Applications, Pergamon Press, New York, NY.
58. Thoma, J., 1990, Simulation by Bondgraphs - Introduction to a Graphical Method, Ed. 1, Springer Verlag, Berlin.
59. Triengo, M., Bos, A., 1985, "Modeling the Dynamics and Kinematics of Mechanical Systems with Multibond Graphs", Journal of Franklin Institute, vol. 319, pp. 37-50.
60. Ullman, D., 1992, The Mechanical Design Process, McGraw-Hill, Inc., St. Louis, MO.
61. Ulrich, K., Seering W., 1987, "Conceptual Design: Synthesis of Systems of Components", Intelligent and Integrated Manufacturing Analysis and Synthesis, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY, pp. 57-66.
62. Ulrich, K., Eppinger, S., 1995, Product Design and Development, McGraw-Hill, St. Louis, MO
63. Verma, M., Wood, W., 2000, "A Function-Based Approach to Design for Manufacturing", Proceedings of DETC00, DTEC2000/DFM-14025, Baltimore, Maryland.
64. Vliet, J., van Luffervelt, C., 1999, "State of the Art Report on Design for Manufacturing", Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, DETC99/DFM-8970, Las Vegas, NV.