Concepts of pressure in an ischial containment socket: Perception

Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 12-20

  Neumann, Edward S ^a,c   Wong, Jocelyn S ^b   Drollinger, Robert L ^a  

^a University of Nevada Las Vegas   (United States)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c Dept of Civ and Environ Eng   (United States)

Author keywords

Dynamic socket pressure; Ischial containment socket; Pressure perception; Psychophysical measurement

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONCEPT FORMATION; DEVICE; GAIT; GLUTEUS MAXIMUS MUSCLE; ISCHIUM; LIMB; MECHANORECEPTOR; PERCEPTION; PRESSURE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCALE UP; SELF REPORT; SKELETAL MUSCLE; TENDON;

EID: 13244287821     PISSN: 10408800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00008526-200501000-00004     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Neumann ES. Measurement of socket discomfort. Part I: pressure sensation. J Prosthet Orthot 2001;13:99-110.
2. Neumann ES. Measurement of socket discomfort. Part II. signal detection. J Prosthet Orthot 2001;13:111-122.
3. Borg G. Borg's Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1998.
4. Gescheider GA. Psychophysics. 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1997.
5. Edsberg LE, Mates RE, Baier RE, Lauren M. Mechanical characteristics of human skin subjected to static versus cyclic normal pressures. J Rehabil Res Dev 1999;36:133-141.
6. Hermann EC, Knapp CF, Donoforio JC, Salcido R. Skin perfusion responses to surface pressure-induced ischemia: implication for the developing pressure ulcer. J Rehabil Res Dev 1999; 36:109-120.
7. Silver-Thorn MB. Investigation of lower-limb tissue perfusion during loading. J Rehabil Res Dev 2002;39:597-608.
8. Sanders JE, Lam D, Dralle AJ, Okumura R. Interface pressures and shear stresses at thirteen socket sites on two persons with transtibial amputation. J Rehabil Res Dev 1997;34:19-43.
9. Bennett L. Transferring load to flesh. Part I: concepts. Bull Prosthet Res 1971;10-16:39-44.
10. Bennett L. Transferring load to flesh. Part II: analysis of compressive stress. Bull Prosthet Res Fall 1971;(Fall)10-16:45-61.
11. Bennett L. Transferring load to flesh. Part III: analysis of shear stress. Bull Prosthet Res 1972;(Spring)10-17:39-51.
12. Bennett L. Transferring load to flesh. Part IV: flesh reaction to contact curvature. Bull Prosthet Res 1972;(Fall)10-18:60-143.
13. Bennett L. Transferring load to flesh. Part V: experimental work. Bull Prosthet Res 1973;(Spring)10-19:88-103.
14. Bennett L. Transferring load to flesh. Part VI: socket brim radius effects. Bull Prosthet Res 1973;(Fall)10-20:103-117.
15. Bennett L. Transferring load to flesh. Part VII: Gel liner effects. Bull Prosthet Res 1974;(Spring)10-21:23-52.
16. Bennett L. Transferring load to flesh. Bull Prosthet Res 1974; (Fall)10-22:133-143.
17. Bennett L. Transferring load to flesh. Part VIII: stasis and stress. Bull Prosthet Res 1975;(Spring)10-23:202-210.
18. Klasson B. Appreciation of Prosthetic Socket Fitting From Basic Engineering Principles. Technical report WE 172 KLA. Glasgow: National Centre for Training and Education in Prosthetics and Orthotics, Strathclyde University, 1995.
19. Fung YB. Mechanical properties of blood vessels. In: Johnson PC, ed. Peripheral Circulation. New York: John Wiley, 1978:45-80.
20. Rydevik B, Lundborg G, Olmarker K, Myers R. Biomechanics of peripheral nerves and spinal root nerves. In: Nordin M, Frankel VH, eds. Basic Biomechanics of the Musculoskeletal System, 3rd ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001:137-139.
21. Green DM, Swets J. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. Los Altos: Peninsula Publ, 1988.
22. Wickens CD, Hollands JG. Engineering Psychology and Human Performance, 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2000.
23. Radcliffe CW. Prosthetics. In: Rose J, Gamble JG, eds. Human Walking. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1994:168-173.
24. Sanders JE, Nicholson BS, Zachariah SG, et al. Testing of elastomeric liners used in limb prosthetics: classification of 15 products by mechanical performance. J Rehabil Res Dev 2004; 41:175-186.