Assessment of the functioning of peripheral auditory pathways after cochlear re-implantation in young children using intra-operative objective measures

British Journal of Audiology

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 179-186

  Mason, S M ^a,c   Dodd, M ^b   Gibbin, K P ^c   O'Donoghue, G M ^c  

^a Medical Physics Department   (United Kingdom)

^b Nottingham Paediatric Cochlear Implant Programme   (United Kingdom)

^c QUEEN S MEDICAL CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; EABR; ESRT; Re implantation; Thresholds

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC REFLEX; ARTICLE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NERVE FUNCTION; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SECOND LOOK SURGERY;

EID: 0033939425     PISSN: 03005364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/03005364000000127     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Balkany TJ, Hodges AV, Gömez-Marin O, Bird PA, Dolan-Ash S, Butts S et al. Cochlear reimplantation. Laryngoscope 1999; 109: 351-5.
2. Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Fryauf-Bertschy H, Kelsay D, Gantz BJ. Intra-operative and postoperative electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses in Nucleus cochlear implant users: Implications for the fitting process. Ear Hear 1994; 15: 168-76.
3. Chute PM, Hellman SA, Parisier SC, Tartter VC, Economou A. Auditory perception changes after re-implantation in a child cochlear implant user. Ear Hear 1992; 13: 195-9.
4. Gantz BJ, Lowder MW, McCabe BF. Audiologic results following reimplantation of cochlear implants. Annals Otol Rhinol & Laryngol 1989; 98: 12-16.
5. Hall RD. Estimation of surviving spiral ganglion cells in the deaf rat using the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response. Hear Res 1990; 45: 123-36.
6. Kileny PR. Use of electrophysiologic measures in the management of children with cochlear implants: brainstem, middle latency, and cognitive (P300) responses. Am J Otol (Suppl.) 1991; 12: 37-42.
7. Mason SM. Objective measures. Am J Otol 1997; 18: S84-S87.
8. Mason SM, Sheppard S, Garnham CW, Lutman ME, O'Donoghue GM, Gibbin KP. Improving the relationship of intraoperative EABR threshold to T-level in young children receiving the Nucleus cochlear implant. In: IJ Hochmair-Desoyer, ES Hochmair (eds), Advances in Cochlear Implants. Vienna: International Interscience Seminars, 1994; 44-9.
9. Mason SM, Garnham CW, Sheppard S, O'Donoghue GM, Gibbin KP. An intraoperative test protocol for objective assessment of the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant. In: AS Uziel, M Mondain (eds), Cochlear Implants in Children. Advances in Otorhinolaryngology. Basel: Karger, 1995; 38-44.
10. Mason SM, Gibbin KP, Garnham CW, O'Donoghue GM, Twomey T. Intraoperative electrophysiological and objective measures after cochlear re-implantation in a young child. Br J Audiol 1996; 30: 67-70.
11. Miyamoto RT, Svirsky MA, Myres WA, Kirk KI, Schulte J. Cochlear implant re-implantation. Am J Otol 1997; 18 (Suppl. 6): S60-S61.
12. Parisier SC, Chute PM, Weiss MH, Hellman SA, Wang RC. Results of cochlear implant reinsertion. Laryngoscope 1991; 101: 1013-15.
13. Saeed SR, Ramsden RT, Hartley C, Woolford TJ, Boyd P. Cochlear re-implantation. J Laryngol Otol 1995; 109: 980-5.
14. Shallop JK. Objective measurements and the audiological management of cohlear implant patients. In: BR Alford, J Jerger, HA Jenkins (eds), Electrophysiological Evaluation in Otolaryngology. Advances in Otorhinolaryngology. Basel: Karger, 1997; 85-111.
15. Smith L, Simmons FB. Estimating eighth nerve survival by electrical stimulation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1983; 92: 19-23.
16. Spivak LG, Chute PM. The relationship between electrical acoustical reflex thresholds and behavioural comfort levels in children and adult cochlear implant patients. Ear Hear 1994; 15: 184-92.