Metal and ligand K-edge XAS of organotitanium complexes: Metal 4p and 3d contributions to pre-edge intensity and their contributions to bonding

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 127, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 667-674

  George, Serena DeBeer ^a   Brant, Patrick ^b   Solomon, Edward I ^c  

^a SLAC NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY   (United States)

^b EXXONMOBIL UPSTREAM RESEARCH COMPANY   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCULATIONS; CATALYST ACTIVITY; CORRELATION METHODS; HOMOPOLYMERIZATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; METALS;

ANTICANCER AGENTS; CYCLOPENTADIENYL (CP); ORGANOTITANIUM COMPLEXES;

TITANIUM COMPOUNDS;

CHLORIDE; METAL COMPLEX; TITANIUM CYCLOPENTADIENYL; TITANIUM DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPY; ARTICLE; COVALENT BOND; DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY; DRUG STRUCTURE; METAL BINDING; POLYMERIZATION; ROENTGEN SPECTROSCOPY;

MODELS, MOLECULAR; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; SPECTROMETRY, X-RAY EMISSION; TITANIUM;

EID: 12944298284     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja044827v     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Alt, H. G.; Köppl, A. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1205.
2. Coates, G. W. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1223.
3. Hlatky, G. G. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1999, 181, 243.
4. Green, J. C. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1998, 27, 263.
5. Britzinger, H. H.; Fischer, D.; Mülhaupt, R.; Rieger, B.; Waymouth, R. M. Angew. Chem. 1995, 34, 1143.
6. Natta, G.; Pino, P.; Mazzanti, G.; Giannini, U. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1957, 79, 2975.
7. Ziegler, K.; Holzkamp, E.; Breil, H.; Martin, H. Angew. Chem. 1955, 67, 541.
8. Grassi, A.; Saccheo, S.; Zambelli, A.; Laschi, F. Macromolecules 1998, 31, 5588.
9. Williams, E. F.; Murray, M. C.; Baird, M. C. Macromolecules 2000, 33, 261.
10. Mahanthappa, M. K.; Waymouth, R. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 12093.
11. Harding, M. M.; Mokdsi, G. Curr. Med. Chem. 2000, 7, 1289.
12. Guo, M.; Guo, Z.; Sadler, P. J. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 6, 698.
13. Guo, M.; Sadler, P. J. Dalton 2000, 1, 7.
14. Köpf-Maier, P. Anticancer Res. 1999, 19, 493.
15. Kroger, N.; Kleeberg, U. R.; Mross, K.; Edler, L.; Sass, G.; Hossfeld, D. K. Onokologie 2000, 23, 60.
16. Westre T. E.; Kennepohl, P.; DeWitt, J. G.; Hedman, B.; Hodgson, K. O.; Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 6297.
17. Kau, L. S.; Spira-Solomon, D. J.; Penner-Hahn, J. E.; Hodgson, K. O.; Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 6433.
18. DuBois, J. L.; Mukherjee, P.; Solomon, E. I.; Stack, T. D. P.; Hodgson, K. O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 5775.
19. Fraile, J. M.; García, J.; Mayoral, J. A.; Proietti, M. G.; Sánchez, M. C. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 19484.
20. Farges, F.; Brown, G. E., Jr.; Rehr, J. J. Phys. Rev. B 1997, 56, 1809.
21. Matsuo, S.; Sakaguchi, N.; Obuchi, E.; Nakano, K.; Perera, R. C. C.; Watanabe, T.; Matsuo, T.; Wakita, H. Anal. Sci. 2001, 17, 149.
22. Wasserman, E. P.; Westwood, A. D.; Zhengtian, Y.; Oskam, J. H.; Duenas, S. L. J. Mol. Catal. A 2001, 172, 67.
23. Thomas, J. M.; Sankar, G. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 571.
24. Solomon, E. I.; Hedman, B.; Hodgson, K. O.; Dey, A.; Szilagyi, R. K. Coord. Chem. Rev. In press.
25. Glaser, T.; Hedman, B.; Hodgson, K. O.; Solomon, E. I. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 859.
26. Glaser, T.; Rose, K.; Shadle, S. E.; Hedman, B.; Hodgson, K. O.; Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 442.
27. Arrio, M.-A.; Rossano, S.; Brouder, C.; Galoisy, L.; Calas, G. Europhys. Lett. 2000, 51, 454.
28. Hedman, B.; Frank, P.; Gheller, S. F.; Roe, A. L.; Newton, W. E.; Hodgson, K. O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 3798.
29. Lytle, F. W.; Greegor, R. B.; Sandstrom, D. R.; Marques, E. C.; Wong, J.; Spiro, C. L.; Huffman, G. P.; Huggins, F. E. Nucl. Instrum. Methods 1984, 226, 542.
30. Stern, E. A.; Heald, S. M. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1979, 50, 1579.
31. George, G. N. Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center. Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94309.
32. te Velde, G.; Bickelhaupt, F. M.; Baerends, E. J.; Guerra, C. F.; van Ginsberg, S. J. A.; Snijders, J. G.; Ziegler, T. J. Comput. Chem. 2001, 22, 931.
33. Baerends, E. J.; Ellis, D. E.; Ros, P. Chem. Phys. 1973, 2, 41.
34. Vosko, S. H.; Wilk, L.; Nusair, M. Can. J. Phys. 1980, 58, 1200.
35. Becke, A. D. Phys. Rev. A 1988, 38, 3098.
36. Perdew, J. P. Phys. Rev. B 1986, 33, 8822.
37. Troyanov, S. I.; Snigireva, E. M. Russian J. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 45, 580.
38. Engelhardt, L. M.; Papasergio, R. I.; Raston, C. L.; White, A. H. Organometallics 1984, 3, 18.
39. Tkachev, V. V.; Atovmyan, L. O. Zh. Strukt. Khim. 1972, 13, 287.
40. In these complexes, dipole and quadrupole based transitions are not shifted in energy. This is in contrast to studies on infinite lattice structures were 3d-3d hybridization between neighboring Ti atoms is thought to occur. [Cabaret, D.; Joly, Y.; Renevier, H.; Natoli, C. R. J. Synch. Rad. 1999, 6, 258 and Shirley, E. L. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 2004, 135, 77.] The present study examines molecular complexes where extended lattice interactions do not complicate the bonding description.
41. In these complexes, dipole and quadrupole based transitions are not shifted in energy. This is in contrast to studies on infinite lattice structures were 3d-3d hybridization between neighboring Ti atoms is thought to occur. [Cabaret, D.; Joly, Y.; Renevier, H.; Natoli, C. R. J. Synch. Rad. 1999, 6, 258 and Shirley, E. L. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 2004, 135, 77.] The present study examines molecular complexes where extended lattice interactions do not complicate the bonding description.
42. 4. which demonstrate that creation of a ls core hole changes the d-orbital energy splittings by less than 0.2 eV and although the d-character is reduced by x0.88, the relative intensities are essentially unchanged. A VBCI analysis which reproduces the ground-state parameters and allows for a Q of 4 eV for relaxation gives less than 10% intensity redistribution into shake-up satellites. Shake-up satellites are also not observed experimentally.
43. Shadle, S. E.; Hedman, B.; Hodgson, K. O.; Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 2259.
44. Gewirth, A. A.; Cohen, S. L.; Schugar, H. J.; Solomon, E. I. Inorg. Chem. 1987, 26, 1133.
45. Didziulis, S. V.; Cohen, S. L.; Gewirth, A. A.; Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 250.
46. From Table 2, the covalency is 32% per Ti-Cl bond or a total Cl 3p covalency of 96% over the five metal 3d Orbitals. Using the relative intensity ratios of the two pre-edge peaks (Table 2), it is determined that 62% Cl 3p character will be in the three lowest energy d-orbitals and 34% will be in the two highest energy d-orbitals.
47. 4.
48. van der Laan, G.; Westra, C.; Haas, C.; Sawatzky, G. A. Phys. Rev. B 1981, 23, 4369.
49. Davis, L. C. Phys. Rev. B 1982, 25, 2912.
50. Smith, D. W. Inorg. Cim. Acta 1977, 22, 107.
51. Schäffer, C. E. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1995, 240, 581.
52. Hitchman, M. A.; Cassidy, P. J. Inorg. Chem. 1979, 18, 1745.
53. 2 = 2.0 eV gives a metal d-based ground state with 75% 3d character, 20% Cl 3p character, and 5% 4p mixing.