How do you know? A strategy to help emergent readers make inferences

Reading Teacher

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 290-293

  Richards, Janet C ^a   Anderson, Nancy A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 12944280975     PISSN: 00340561     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Anderson, R., & Pearson, P.D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P.D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255-291). New York: Longman.
2. Barnitz, J. (2002). Language diversity foundations for literacy instruction. In J. Gipe (Ed.), Multiple paths to literacy: Classroom techniques for struggling readers (5th ed., pp. 50-64). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
3. Dewitz, P., & Dewitz, P. (2003). They can read the words, but they can't understand: Refining comprehension assessment. The Reading Teacher, 56, 422-435.
4. Hansen, J. (1981). Inferential comprehension strategy for use with primary grade children. The Reading Teacher, 34, 665-669.
5. Hansen, J., & Pearson, P.D. (1983). An instructional study: Improving the inferential comprehension of fourth grade good and poor readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 821-829.
6. Kucan, L., & Beck, I. (1997). Thinking aloud and reading comprehension research: Inquiry, instruction, and social interaction. Review of Educational Research, 67, 271-299.
7. Long, D., Seely, R., Oppy, B., & Golding, J. (1996). The role of inferential processing in reading ability. In B. Britton & A. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 189-214). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Mantione, R., & Smead, S. (2003). Weaving through words: Using the arts to teach reading comprehension strategies. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
9. Mora, J., & Grisham, D. (2001). iWhat deliches tortillas! Preparing teachers for literacy instruction in linguistically diverse classrooms. Teacher Education Quarterly, 28(4), 51-70.
10. Neuman, S. (1990). Assessing children's inferencing strategies. In J. Zutell & S. McCormick (Eds.), Literacy theory and research: Analysis from multiple paradigms (pp. 267-274). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
11. Paris, S., & Upton, L. (1976). Children's memory for inferential relationships in prose. Child Development, 47, 660-668.
12. Raphael, T., & Wonnacott, C. (1985). Heightening fourth-grade students' sensitivity to sources of information for answering survey questions. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 282-296.
13. Richards, J., & McKenna, M. (2003). integrating multiple literacies in K-8 classrooms: Cases, commentaries, and practical applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2001). Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Suh, S., & Trabasso, T. (1993). Inferences during reading: Converging evidence from discourse analysis, talk-aloud protocols and recognition priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 270-301.
16. Trabasso, T., & Suh, S. (1993). Understanding text: Achieving explanatory coherence through on-line inferences and mental operations in working memory. Discourse Processes, 16, 3-34.