Indirect detection of lung perfusion using susceptibility-based hyperpolarized gas imaging

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 149-155

  Dimitrov, Ivan E ^a   Insko, Erik ^a   Rizi, Rahim ^a   Leigh, John S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Helium; Hyperpolarized gas; Indirect detection; Lung perfusion; Pulmonary embolism; Susceptibility

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM; HELIUM;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; DIPOLE; ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE; GAS; HYPERPOLARIZATION; LUNG CAPILLARY; LUNG EMBOLISM; LUNG GAS EXCHANGE; LUNG PERFUSION; LUNG VENTILATION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SWINE;

ANIMALS; BLOOD; CAPILLARIES; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HELIUM; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ISOTOPES; LASERS; LUNG; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PULMONARY CIRCULATION; SWINE; VENTILATION-PERFUSION RATIO;

EID: 12744261206     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20246     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Silverstein M, Helt J, Mohr D, Petterson T, O'Fallon W, Melton L. Trends in the Incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a 25-year population-based study. Arch Intern Med 1998;158:585-593.
2. Alpert J, Smith R, Carlson C, Ockene I, Dexter L, Dalen J, Mortality in patients treated for pulmonary embolism. JAMA 1976;236:1477-1480.
3. Walker TG, Happer W. Spin-exchange optical pumping of noble-gas nuclei. Rev Mod Phys 1997;69:629-642.
4. Mozurkewich G, Ringermacher HI, Bolef Dl. Effect of demagnetization on magnetic resonance shapes in bulk samples: application to tungsten. Phys Rev B 1979;20:33-38.
5. Stratton JA. Electromagnetic theory. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company: 1941. p 258-261.
6. Chen XJ, Chawla MS, Gofer GP, Hedlund LW, Möller HE, Johnson GA. Hyperpolarized 3He NMR lineshape measurements in live guinea pig lung. Magn Reson Med 1998;40:61-65.
7. Weibel ER. Geometry and dimensions of alveolar capillary network. Morphometry of the human lung. New York: Academic Press; 1963. p 77.
8. Albert MS, Huang W, Lee J-H, Patlak CS, Springer CS. Susceptibility changes following bolus injections. Magn Reson Med 1993;29:700-708.
9. Rosen B, Belliveau J, Chien D. Perfusion imaging by nuclear magnetic resonance. Magn Reson Q 1989;5:263-281.
10. Beuf O, Briguet A, Lissac M, Davis R. Magnetic resonance imaging for the determination of magnetic susceptibility of materials. J Magn Reson Ser B 1996;112:111-118.
11. Bevington PR. Data reduction and error analysis for the physical sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1969. p 161-163.
12. Mills S, Jackson D, Older R, Heaston D, Moore A. The incidence, etiologies, and avoidance of complications of pulmonary angiography in a large series. Radiology 1980;136:295-299.
13. Stein P, Athanasoulis C, Alavi A, et al. Complications and validity of pulmonary angiography in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 1992;85:462-468.
14. PIOPED, Investigators. Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. JAMA 1990;263:2753-2759.
15. Goodman L, Curtin J, Mewissen M, et al. Detection of pulmonary embolism in patients with unresolved clinical and scintigraphic diagnosis: helical CT versus angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;164:1369-1374.
16. Rathbun S, Raskob G, Whitsett T. Sensitivity and specificity of helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2000;132:227-232.
17. Nishimura DG, Macovski A, Pauly JM. Magnetic resonance angiography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1986;MI-5:140-151.
18. Irarrazaval P, Santos J, Guarini M, Nishimura D. Flow properties of fast three-dimensional sequences for MR angiography. Magn Reson Imaging 1999;17:1469-1479.
19. Wielopolski P. Magnetic resonance pulmonary angiography. Coron Artery Dis 1999;10:157-175.
20. Schiebler ML, Holland GA, Hatabu H, et al. Suspected pulmonary embolism: prospective evaluation with pulmonary MR angiography. Radiology 1993;189:125-131.
21. Villringer A, Rosen BR, Belliveau JW, et al. Dynamic imaging with lanthanide chelates in normal brain: contrast due to magnetic susceptibility effects. Magn Reson Med 1988;6:164-174.
22. Fisel CR, Ackerman JL, Buxton RB, et al. MR contrast due to microscopically heterogeneous magnetic susceptibility: numerical simulations and applications to cerebral physiology. Magn Reson Med 1991;17:336-347.
23. Belliveau JW, Kennedy DN, McKinstry RC, et al. Functional mapping of the human visual cortex by magnetic resonance imaging. Science 1991;254:716-719.
24. Weisskoff RM, Kiihne S. MRI susceptometry: image-based measurement of absolute susceptibility of MR contrast agents and human blood, Magn Reson Med 1992;24:375-383.
25. Morris AH, Blatter DD, Case TA, et al. A new nuclear magnetic resonance property of the lung, J Appl Physiol 1985;58:759-762.
26. Bergin CJ, Glover GH, Pauly JM. Lung parenchyma: magnetic susceptibility In MR imaging. Radiology 1991;180:845-848.
27. Callot V, Canet E, Brochot J, et al. MR perfusion imaging using encapsulated laser-polarized 3He. Magn Reson Med 2001;46:535-540.
28. Viallon M, Berthezene Y, Decorps M, et al. Laser-polarized 3He as a probe for dynamic regional measurements of lung perfusion and ventilation using magnetic resonance imaging, Magn Reson Med 2000;44:1-4.
29. Thulborn KR, Waterton JC, Matthews PM, Radda GK, Oxygenation dependence of the transverse relaxation time of water protons In whole blood at high field. Biochim Blophys Acta 1982;714:265-270.