Why farm salmon outcompete fishery salmon

Marine Policy

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 259-270

  Eagle, Josh ^a   Naylor, Rosamond ^b   Smith, Whitney ^b  

^a STANFORD LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aquaculture; Fisheries policy; Fishing industry; Salmon; Seafood markets; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION (ECONOMICS); FISHING INDUSTRY; MARKET CONDITIONS; SALMONID CULTURE; SALMONID FISHERY;

ALASKA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 1242321316     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2003.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Sylvia G, et al. The new order in global salmon markets, aquaculture development: Implications for watershed-based management in the Pacific Northwest. In: Knudsen E, editor. Proceedings of the Sustainable Fisheries Conference, Victoria, British Columbia, 2000. p. 233-51.
2. Béné C. et. al Impact of cultured shrimp on wild shrimp fisheries: Analysis of price determination mechanisms and market dynamics Agricultural Economics 23 2000 55-68
3. Knapp GP. Implications of aquaculture for wild fisheries: the case of Alaska wild salmon. Powerpoint presentation, Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Alaska Anchorage, 2002.
4. Anderson JL. The growth of salmon aquaculture, the emerging new world order of the salmon industry. In: Pikitch EK, Huppert DD, Sissinwine MP, editors. Global trends: Fisheries management, vol. 20. American Fisheries Society Symposium, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD 1997.
5. Alaska Department of Fish and Game. Alaska salmon enhancement program: 2002 annual report, Juneau 2003.
6. Alaska Department of Fish and Game. Salmon ex-vessel price per pound: Time series by species, Juneau 2003.
7. State of Alaska, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission. Permit statistics for Alaska's limited entry salmon fisheries: 1993-2002, Juneau 2003.
8. Colt S. The economic importance of healthy Alaska ecosystems. Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of Alaska Anchorage, 2001.
9. State of Alaska, Department of Community and Economic Development. Alaska seafood industry, Juneau 1997.
10. Alaska Department of Fish and Game. Subsistence in Alaska: A year 2000 update, Juneau 2000.
11. Knapp G.P. Alaska salmon ranching: An economic review of the Alaska salmon hatchery programme Howell B.R. Moksness E. Svasand T. Stock enhancement and sea ranching 1999 537-556 Fishing News Books Oxford
12. Schumpeter J. Business cycles 1939 McGraw-Hill New York
13. McConnel C. Economics: Principles, problems and policies 1984 McGraw-Hill New York
14. Cooley R.A. Politics and conservation: The decline of Alaska salmon 1963 Harper - Row New York
15. Crutchfield J. Pontecorvo G. The Pacific salmon fisheries 1969 Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore, MD
16. Smith C.L. Salmon fishers of the Columbia 1979 Oregon State University Press Corvallis
17. Muir J.F. Young J.A. Aquaculture and marine fisheries: Will capture fisheries remain competitive? Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science 23 1998 157-174
18. Knapp GP. Change, challenges and opportunities for wild fisheries. Powerpoint presentation, Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Alaska Anchorage, 2002.
19. Miller KA, Fluharty DL. El Niño and variability in the Northeast Pacific salmon fishery: Climate variability. In: Glanz MH, editor. Climate change and fisheries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
20. Naylor R.L.et al Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies Nature 405 2000 1017-1024
21. Noakes D.J.et al On the decline of Pacific salmon and speculative links to salmon farming in British Columbia Aquaculture 183 3-4 2000 363-386
22. Goldburg R.J.et al Marine aquaculture in the United States 2001 Pew Oceans Commission Washington, DC
23. Colt S. Salmon fish traps in Alaska. Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of Alaska Anchorage, 1999.
24. Higgs R. Legally induced technical regress in the Washington salmon fishery Research in Economic History 7 1982 55-86
25. Bristol Bay Economic Development Corporation. An analysis of options to restructure the Bristol Bay salmon fishery, 2003.
26. Knapp GP, et al. Effects of the 2002 Chignik salmon cooperative: A survey of Chignik salmon permit holders. Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of Alaska Anchorage, 2002.
27. Alaska Department of Fish and Game. Chignik salmon purse seine fishery: Summary data on issues related to the 2002 cooperative fishery, Juneau 2002.
28. National Marine Fisheries Service, Federal Fisheries Investment Task Force. Report to congress, 1999.
29. Bristol Bay Times newspaper, May 15, 2003.
30. National Marine Fisheries Service, Commercial landings database. http://www.st.nmfs.gov/st1/commercial/landings/gear_landings.html
31. State of Alaska, Joint Legislative Salmon Industry Task Force. Report, 2003.
32. Phillis Y. Andriantiatsaholiniaina L. Sustainability: An ill-defined concept and its assessment using fuzzy logic Ecological Economics 37 2001 435-439
33. Norton B. Toman M. Sustainability:E ecological and economic perspectives Land Economics 73 4 1997 553-568
34. Hohmeyer O.et al Social costs and sustainability 1997 Springer Berlin
35. Brundtland H. Our common future (for the World Commission on Environment and Development). Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1987. p. 45-65.
36. Galasso V. Profetta P. The political economy of social security: A survey European Journal of Political Economy 18 1 2002 1-29
37. Yeto S.et al Potential gains from cooperation for vessels and countries Marine Resource Economics 12 2 1997 145-158
38. Kitts A.W. Edwards S.F. Cooperatives in US fisheries: Realizing the potential of the fishermen's collective marketing act Marine Policy 27 5 2003 357-366
39. Campbell D.et al Individual transferable catch quotas: Australian experience in the southern bluefin tuna fishery Marine Policy 24 2 2000 109-117
40. Grafton R.Q.et al Private property and economic efficiency: A study of a common-pool resource Journal of Law and Economics 43 2 2000 679-714
41. Merrifield J. Implementation issues: The political economy of efficient fishing Ecological Economics 30 1 1999 5-12
42. Eythorsson E. A decade of ITQ-management in Icelandic fisheries: Consolidation without consensus Marine Policy 24 6 2000 483-492
43. Knowles T. Disaster declaration, Juneau 2001.
44. Environment and Natural Resources Institute, University of Alaska Anchorage (for Trout Unlimited). Evaluating Alaska's ocean-ranching salmon hatcheries: Biologic and management issues, 2001.
45. Hackett S.C. Environmental and natural resources economics: Theory, policy, and the sustainable society 2nd ed 1998 ME Sharpe New York
46. Pacific Northwest Pollution Prevention Research Center. Pollution prevention opportunities in the fish processing industry, Seattle, 1993.
47. Loy W. Salmon processors face EPA scrutiny. Anchorage Daily News May 20, 2001.
48. Cederholm CJ, et al. Pacific salmon and wildlife-ecological contexts, relationships, and implications for management. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, 2000.
49. Muse B. Fleet reduction in British Columbia's commercial salmon fisheries: 1996-1998. Alaska Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission, Juneau 1999.
50. Muse B. Washington State commercial salmon fishery buyback programs: 1995-1998. Alaska Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission, Juneau 1999.
51. Holland D.et al Do fishing vessel buyback programs work: A survey of the evidence Marine Policy 23 1 1999 47-69
52. Weninger Q. McConnell K. Buyback programs in commercial fisheries: Efficiency versus transfers Canadian Journal of Economics 33 2 2000 394-412
53. Farmer L.et al Sensory characteristics of farmed and wild Atlantic salmon Aquaculture 187 2000 105-125
54. George R. Bhopal R.S. Fat composition of free living and farmed sea species: Implications for human diet and sea-farming techniques British Food Journal 97 8 1995 19-22
55. van Vliet T. Katan M.B. Lower ratio of n-3 to n-6 fatty acids in cultured than in wild fish American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 51 1 1990 1-2
56. Easton M.et al Preliminary examination of contaminant loadings in farmed salmon, wild salmon and commercial salmon feed Chemosphere 46 7 2002 1053-1074
57. Jacobs M.et al Investigation of selected persistent organic pollutants in farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), salmon aquaculture feed, and fish oil components of the feed Environmental Science and Technology 36 13 2002 2797-2805
58. Baker R. Canthaxanthin in aquafeed applications: Is there any risk? Trends in Food Science - Technology 12 7 2002 240-243
59. Haugen AS. Personal comment, 2002.
60. Verdurme A. Viaene J. Consumer beliefs and attitude towards genetically modified food: Basis for segmentation and implications for communication Agribusiness 19 1 2003 91-113
61. Grannis J. Thilmany D. Marketing natural pork: An empirical analysis of consumers in the mountain region Agribusiness 18 4 2002 475-489
62. Arce A. Marsden T. Social construction of international food: A new research agenda Economic Geography 69 3 1993 293-311
63. Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute. Website, http://www.alaskaseafood.org visited July 2003
64. Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute. Research on salmon consumption. Powerpoint presentation, April 2000.