The Matrix of Control: Combining Process and Structure Approaches to Managing Software Development

Journal of Management Information Systems

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 159-196

  Nidumolu, Sarma R ^a   Subramani, Mani R ^b  

^a CEO of Gandiva Inc

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Decentralization; Organizational control; Process performance; Software development; Software project management; Standardization

Indexed keywords

BUDGET CONTROL; DECISION MAKING; PERFORMANCE; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; QUALITY CONTROL; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; STANDARDS;

DECENTRALIZATION; ORGANIZATIONAL CONTROL; PROCESS PERFORMANCE;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

EID: 1242310120     PISSN: 07421222     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07421222.2003.11045774     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Adler, P.S., and Borys, B. Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 1 (1996), 61-89.
2. Andres, H.P., and Zmud, R.W. A contingency approach to software project coordination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 3 (Winter 2001-2), 41-70.
3. Argote, L. Input uncertainty and organizational coordination in hospital emergency units. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 3 (1982), 420-434.
4. Barker, J.R. Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 3 (1993), 408-437.
5. Baroudi, J.J., and Orlikowski, W.J. The problem of statistical power in MIS research. MIS Quarterly, 13, 1 (March 1989), 87-106.
6. Bentler, P.M. Structural Equations Program Manual. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software, 1989.
7. Brown, C.V. Examining the emergence of hybrid governance solutions: Evidence from a single case site. Information Systems Research, 8, 1 (March 1997), 69-94.
8. Brown, J.S., and Duguid, P. Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science, 2, 1 (1991), 40-57.
9. Brown, S.L., and Eisenhardt, K.M. Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 20, 2 (April 1995), 343-378.
10. Carpenter, M.A., and Golden, B.R. Perceived managerial discretion: A study of cause and effect. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 3 (1997), 187-206.
11. Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, revised ed. New York: Academic Press, 1977.
12. Conger, S. The New Software Engineering. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1994.
13. Cook, T.D., and Campbell, D.T. Quasi-Experimentation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1979.
14. Cusumano, M.A. Japan's Software Factories: A Challenge to U.S. Management. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.
15. Cusumano, M.A., and Selby, R.W. Microsoft Secrets: How the World's Most Powerful Company Creates Technology, Shapes Markets and Manages People. New York: Free Press, 1995.
16. Davis, M. Professional responsibility: Just following the rules? Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 18, 1 (1999), 65-88.
17. Dean, J.W., Jr.; Joon, Y.S.; and Susman, G.I. Advanced manufacturing technology and organization structure: Empowerment or subordination. Organization Science, 3, 2 (May 1992), 203-229.
18. DeLone, W.H., and McLean, E.R. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3, 1 (1992), 60-95.
19. Drazin, R., and Van de Ven, A.M. Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 4 (1985), 514-539.
20. Eisenhardt, K.M. Control: Organizational and economic approaches. Management Science, 31, 2 (1985), 134-149.
21. Flamholtz, E.G.; Das, T.K.; and Tsui, A. Toward an integrative framework of organizational control. Accounting Organizations and Society, 10, 1 (1985), 35-50.
22. Fry, L.W., and Slocum, J.W., Jr. Technology, structure and work group effectiveness: A test of a contingency model. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 2 (1984), 221-246.
23. Govindarajan, V., and Fisher, J. Strategy, control systems, and resource sharing: Effects on business-unit performance. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 2 (1990), 259-285.
24. Gurbuxani, V., and Kemerer, C.F. An agent theoretic perspective on the management of information systems. In R.H. Sprague, Jr. (ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Science. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1989, pp. 141-150.
25. Hambrick, D.C., and Finkelstein, S. Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. In B.M. Staw and L.L. Cummings (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior Interactional Psychology. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1987, pp. 369-406.
26. Hartwick, J., and Barki, H. Explaining the role of user participation in information systems use. Management Science, 40, 4 (1994), 440-465.
27. Henderson, J.C., and Lee, S. Managing I/S design teams: A control theories perspective. Management Science, 38, 6 (June 1992), 757-777.
28. Herbsleb, J.; Zubrow, D.; Goldenson, D.; Hayes, W.; and Paulk, M. Software quality and the capability maturity model. Communications of the ACM, 40, 6 (1997), 30-40.
29. Humphrey, W.S. Managing the Software Process. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1989.
30. Humphrey, W.S. A Discipline for Software Engineering. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1995.
31. Iacono, C.S.; Subramani, M.; and Henderson, J.C. Entrepreneur or intermediary: The nature of the relationship manager's job. In G. Ariav, C. Beath, J.I. DeGross, R. Hoyer, and C. Kemerer (eds.), Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Information Systems. Atlanta: Association for Information Systems, 1995, pp. 289-299.
32. Jordan, W.C., and Graves, S.C. Principles on the benefits of manufacturing. Management Science, 41, 4 (April 1995), 577-594.
33. Keidel, R.W.; Bell, S.M.; and Lewis, K.J. Rethinking organizational design: Executive commentary. Academy of Management Executive, 8, 4 (1994), 12-30.
34. Keller, R.T. Technology-information process fit and the performance of R&D project groups: A test of contingency theory. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1 (1994), 167-179.
35. Kim, K.K., and Umanath, N.S. Structure and perceived effectiveness of software development subunits: A task contingency analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9, 3 (Winter 1992-93), 157-181.
36. Kirsch, L.J. The management of complex tasks in organizations: Controlling the systems development process. Organizational Science, 7, 1 (1996), 1-21.
37. Kirsch, L.J. Portfolios of control modes and IS project management. Information Systems Research, 8, 3 (1997), 215-239.
38. Klagge, J. Approaches to the iron cage. Administration & Society, 29, 1 (1997), 63-77.
39. Mantei, M. The effects of programming team structures on programming tasks. Communications of the ACM, 24, 3 (1981), 106-113.
40. Manz, C.C., and Sims, H.P. Business Without Bosses: How Self-Managing Teams are Building High Performance Companies. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1993.
41. Miller, D., and Droge, C. Psychological and traditional determents of structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 4 (1986), 539-560.
42. Miller, D.; Droge, C.; and Toulouse, J. Strategic process and content as mediators between organizational context and structure. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 3 (1988), 544-569.
43. Mitchell, T.R. An evaluation of validity of correlational research conducted in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 10, 2 (1985), 192-205.
44. Nemetz, P.L., and Fry, L.W. Flexible manufacturing organizations: Implications for strategy formulation and organizational design. Academy of Management Review, 13, 4 (1988), 627-638.
45. Nidumolu, S.R. The effect of coordination and uncertainty on software project performance: Residual performance risk as an intervening variable. Information Systems Research, 6, 3 (September 1995), 191-219.
46. Nidumolu, S.R., and Knotts, G.P. The effects of reusability and customizability on the perceived process and competitive performance of software firms. MIS Quarterly, 22, 2 (June 1998), 105-137.
47. Olsen, N.C. Survival of the fastest: Improving service velocity. IEEE Software, 12, 5 (September 1995), 28-38.
48. Orlikowski, W.J. Integrated information environment or matrix of control: The contradictory implications of information technologies. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 1, 1 (1991), 19-42.
49. Ouchi, W.G. The relationship between organizational structure and organizational control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 1 (March 1977), 95-113.
50. Ouchi, W.G. The transmission of control through organizational hierarchy. Academy of Management Journal, 2, 2 (1978), 173-192.
51. Ouchi, W.G., and Maguire, M.A. Organizational control: Two functions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 4 (December 1975), 559-569.
52. Ravichandran, T., and Rai, A. Quality management in systems development: An organizational system perspective. MIS Quarterly, 24, 3 (2000), 381-416.
53. Rotemberg, J. Process- versus function-based hierarchies. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 8, 4 (1999), 453-487.
54. Sabherwal, R., and King, W.R. Decision processes for developing strategic applications of information systems: A contingency approach. Decision Sciences, 23, 4 (1992), 917-943.
55. Schoonhoven, C.B. Problems with contingency theory: Testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency "theory." Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 3 (1981), 349-377.
56. Snell, S.A. Control theory in strategic human resource management: The mediating effect of administrative information. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 2 (1992), 292-327.
57. Storey, J. The management of new office technology: Choice, control and social structure in the insurance industry. Journal of Management Studies, 24, 1 (1987), 43-62.
58. Thompson, J.D. Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
59. Tochlin, W. The Research Methods Knowledge Base, 2d ed. Cincinnati: Atomic Dog Publishing, 2000.
60. Upton, D.M. What really makes factories flexible? Harvard Business Review, 73, 4 (1995), 74-81.
61. Van De Ven, A.H.; Delbecq, A.L.; and Koenig, R.J. Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. American Sociological Review, 41, 2 (1976), 322-338.
62. Weber, M. The Theory of Social and Economic Organizations. New York: Free Press, 1947.
63. Weinberg, G. The Psychology of Computer Programming. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1971.
64. Zack, M.H. Jazz improvisation and organizing: Once more from the top. Organization Science, 11, 2 (2000), 227-235.