Dopaminergic effects on electrophysiological and functional MRI measures of human cortical stimulus-response power laws

NeuroImage

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 540-546

  Arthurs, O J ^a   Stephenson, C M E ^a   Rice, K ^b   Lupson, V C ^a   Spiegelhalter, D J ^b   Boniface, S J ^a   Bullmore, E T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b MRC BIOSTATISTICS UNIT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Dopamine; Multimodal; Path analysis; Psychophysics; Scaling; Somatosensory

Indexed keywords

DOPAMINE; DOPAMINE 2 RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; PLACEBO; SULPIRIDE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOPAMINERGIC SYSTEM; DRUG EFFECT; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOMATOSENSORY STIMULATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

EID: 1242293833     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.067     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Amenta F., Barili P., Bronzetti E., Felici L., Mignini F., Ricci A. Localization of dopamine receptor subtypes in systemic arteries. Clin. Exp. Hypertens. 22:2000;277-288.
2. Anderson R.B. The power law as an emergent property. Mem. Cogn. 29:2001;1061-1068.
3. Arthurs O.J., Williams E.J., Carpenter T.A., Pickard J.D., Boniface S.J. Linear coupling between functional magnetic resonance imaging and evoked potential amplitude in human somatosensory cortex. Neuroscience. 101:2000;803-806.
4. Attwell D., Iadecola C. The neural basis of functional brain imaging signals. Trends Neurosci. 25:2002;621-624.
5. Chater N., Brown G.D.A. Scale-invariance as a unifying psychological principle. Cognition. 69:1999;B17-B24.
6. Esaki T., Itoh Y., Shimoji K., Cook M., Jehle J., Sokoloff L. Effects of dopamine receptor blockade on cerebral blood flow response to somatosensory stimulation in the unanesthetised rat. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 303:2002;497-502.
7. Everitt B., Rabe-Hesketh S. Analyzing Medical Data Using S-PLUS. 2001;Springer, New York.
8. Gisiger T. Scale invariance in biology: coincidence or footprint of a universal mechanism? Biol. Rev. 76:2001;161-209.
9. Goldberger A.L., Amaral L.A.N., Hausdorff J.M., Ivanov P.C., Peng C.-K., Stanley H.E. Fractal dynamics in physiology: alterations with disease and aging. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:2002;2466-2472.
10. Ihaka R., Gentleman R. R: A language for data analysis and graphics. J. Comp. Stat. 5:1996;299-314.
11. Jasper H.H. The 10:20 electrode system of the International Federation. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 10:1958;370-375.
12. Kampe K.K., Jones R.A., Auer D.P. Frequency dependence of the functional MRI response after electrical median nerve stimulation. Hum. Brain Mapp. 9:2000;106-114.
13. Krimer L.S., Muly E.C., Williams G.V., Goldman-Rakic P.S. Dopaminergic regulation of cerebral cortical microcirculation. Nat. Neurosci. 1:1998;286-289.
14. Laming D. The Measurement of Sensation. 1997;Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
15. Lemieux L., Allen P.J., Franconi F., Symms M.R., Fish D.R. Recording of EEG during fMRI experiments: patient safety. Magn. Reson. Med. 38:1997;943-952.
16. Linkenkaer-Hansen K., Nikouline V.V., Palva J.M., Ilmoniemi R.J. Long-range temporal correlations and scaling behavior in human brain oscillations. J. Neurosci. 21:2001;1370-1377.
17. Mehta M.A., Sahakain B.J., McKenna P.J., Robbins T.W. Systemic sulpiride in young adult volunteers simulates the profile of cognitive deficits in Parkinson's disease. Psychopharmacology. 146:1999;162-174.
18. Meyer-Lindenberg A., Rammsayre T., Ulferts J., Gallhofer B. The effects of sulpiride on psychomotor performance and subjective tolerance. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 7:1997;219-223.
19. Miller K.D., Troyer T.W. Neural noise can explain expansive, power-law nonlinearities in neural response functions. J. Neurophysiol. 87:2002;653-659.
20. Nieder A., Miller E.K. Coding of cognitive magnitude. Compressed scaling of numerical information in the primate prefrontal cortex. Neuron. 37:2003;149-157.
21. Osaka N., Yamamoto M. WEP latency and RT as power functions of luminance in the peripheral visual field. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 44:1978;785-788.
22. Stevens S.S. On the psychophysical law. Psychol. Rev. 64:1957;153-181.
23. Venables W.N., Ripley B.D. Modern applied statistics with S-PLUS. 1999;Springer, New York.