Individual differences among enabling students: A comparison across three enabling programmes

Journal of Further and Higher Education

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 293-306

  Cantwell, Robert H ^a   Grayson, Rosalie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1242293343     PISSN: 0309877X     EISSN: 14699486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0309877022000021702     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. AMES, C., and ARCHER, J., 1988. Achievement goals in the classroom: Students' learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80: 260–267.
2. ARCHER, J., CANTWELL, R, and BOURKE, S., 1999. University study via an enabling program: achievement, motivation, and self regulation. Higher Education Research and Development, 18: 31–54.
3. BANDURA, A., 1997. Setf-efficacy: the exercise of control, New York: W.H. Freeman & Co.
4. BlGGS, J., 1987. The Study Process Questionnaire, Hawthorn: ACER.
5. CANTWELL, R., and MULHEARN, W., The adjustment behaviours of mature-aged women returning to formal study. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education. December, Brisbane.
6. CANTWELL, R., and MOORE, P., 1996. The development of measures of individual differences in self-regulatory control and their relationship to academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21: 500–517.
7. CANTWELL, R., ARCHER, J., and BOURKE, S., The effectiveness of enabling programmes for university entrance. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education. December, Brisbane.
8. CANTWELL, R., ARCHER, J., and BOURKE, S., 2001. A comparison of the academic experiences of university students entering by traditional and non-traditional means. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(3): 21–34.
9. CHAN, L., 1994. Relationships of motivation, strategic learning and reading achievement in Grades 5, 7 and 9. Journal of Experimental Education, 23: 4–10.
10. FILOZOV, E., ALBERTIN, H., JONES, C., STEME, S., MYERS, L., and MCDERMOTT, R., 1998. Relationship of adolescent self-esteem to selected academic variables. Journal of School Health, 68: 68–72.
11. HAYES, K., KING, E., and RICHARDSON, J., 1997. Mature students in higher education: III. Approaches to studying in access students. Studies in Higher Education, 22: 19–31.
12. HOSKINS, S., NEWSTEAD, S., and DENNIS, I., 1997. Degree performance as a function of age, gender, prior qualifications and discipline studied. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 22: 317–328.
13. MARSH, H., 1996. Causal ordering of academic self-concept and academic achievement: a multiwave, longitudinal panel analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82: 646–656.
14. PAJARES, F., 1997. “ Current directions in self-efficacy research ”. In Advances in Motivation and Achievement, Edited by: MAEHR, M., and PINTRICH, P.R., Vol. 10, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
15. RICHARDSON, J., 1994. Mature students in higher education: II. Academic performance and intellectual ability. Higher Education, 28: 373–386.
16. ROSENBERG, M., 1979. Conceiving the Self, New York: Basic Book Publishers.
17. WHTTSON, I., 1995. The maturing of the Newstep course: the University of Newcastle, 1990-1993. Australian Journal of Adult and Community Education, 35: 116–124.
18. WILSON, F., 1997. The construction of paradox: one case of mature students in higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 51: 347–366.
19. WOOD, R., and LOCKE, E., 1987. The relationship of self-efficacy and grade goals to academic performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65: 792–800.