The potential contribution of preplanned refixations to the preferred viewing location

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 66, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1033-1044

  McDonald, Scott A ^a   Shillcock, Richard C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 12344325147     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194993     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. BAAYEN, R. H., PIEPENBROCK, R., & GULIKERS, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
2. BALOTA, D. A., POLLATSEK, A., & RAYNER, K. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 364-390.
3. BEAUVILLAIN, C., VERGILINO, D., & DUKIC, T. (2000). Planning two-saccade sequences in reading. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 327-354). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
4. BECKER, W. (1989). Metrics. In R. H. Wurtz & M. E. Goldberg (Eds.), The neurobiology of saccadic eye movements (pp. 13-61). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
5. BRYSBAERT, M., & VITU, F. (1998). Word skipping: Implications for theories of eye movement control in reading. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 125-147). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
6. BRYSBAERT, M., VITU, F., & SCHROYENS, W. (1996). The right visual field advantage and the optimal viewing position effect: On the relation between foveal and parafoveal word recognition. Neuropsychology, 10, 385-395.
7. CLARK, J. L., & O'REGAN, J. K. (1999). Word ambiguity and the optimal viewing position in reading. Vision Research, 39, 843-857.
8. DEUTSCH, A., & RAYNER, K. (1999). Initial fixation location effects in reading Hebrew words. Language & Cognitive Processes, 14, 393-421.
9. DORÉ-MAZARS, K., VERGILINO-PEREZ, D., & COLLINS, T. (2003). Are there two populations of refixations in the reading of long words? Commentary on Reichle et al., "The E-Z Reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models." Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 26, 480-481.
10. DUCROT, S., & PYNTE, J. (2002). What determines the eyes' landing position in words? Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1130-1144.
11. DUNN-RANKIN, P. (1978). The visual characteristics of words. Scientific American, 238, 122-130.
12. ENGBERT, R., LONGTIN, A., & KLIEGL, R. (2002). A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing. Vision Research, 42, 621-636.
13. FARID, M., & GRAINGER, J. (1996). How initial fixation position influences visual word recognition: A comparison of French and Arabic. Brain & Language, 53, 351-368.
14. FINDLAY, J. M. (1982). Global processing for saccadic eye movements. Vision Research, 22, 1033-1045.
15. HUESTEGGE, L., RADACH, R., VORSTIUS, C., & HELLER, D. (2003, August). On the metrics of refixation saccades in normal reading. Paper presented at the 12th European Conference on Eye Movements. Dundee, Scotland.
16. HYÖNÄ, J. (1995). Do irregular letter combinations attract readers' at tention? Evidence from fixation locations in words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 68-81.
17. KAPOULA, Z. (1985). Evidence for a range effect in the saccadic system. Vision Research, 25, 1155-1157.
18. KAPOULA, Z., & ROBINSON, D. A. (1986). Saccadic undershoot is not inevitable: Saccades can be accurate. Vision Research, 26, 735-743.
19. LEFFE, A. (2004). A historical review of the representation of the visual field primary cortex with special reference to the neural mechanisms underlying macular sparing. Brain & Language, 88, 268-278.
20. LEGGE, G. E., KLITZ, T. S., & TJAN, B. S. (1997). Mr. Chips: An ideal-observer model of reading. Psychological Review, 104, 524-553.
21. MCCONKIE, G. W., KERR, P. W., REDDIX, M. D., & ZOLA, D. (1988). Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words. Vision Research, 28, 1107-1118.
22. MCCONKIE, G. W., KERR, P. W., REDDIX, M. D., ZOLA, D., & JACOBS, A. M. (1989). Eye movement control during reading: II. Frequency of refixating a word. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 245-253.
23. MCCONKIE, G. W., & RAYNER, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 578-586.
24. MCDONALD, S. A., & SHILLCOCK, R. C. (2003). Low-level predictive inference in reading: The influence of transitional probabilities on eye movements. Vision Research, 43, 1735-1751.
25. MCDONALD, S. A., & SHILLCOCK, R. C. (in press). Anatomical constraints on eye fixation behavior: The implications of foveal splitting for saccade planning in reading. Vision Research.
26. NAZIR, T. A. (1991). On the role of refixations in letter strings: The influence of oculomotor factors. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 373-389.
27. O'REGAN, J. K. (1981). The convenient viewing position hypothesis. In D. F. Monty, R. A. Senders, & J. W. Senders (Eds.), Eye movements: Cognition and visual perception (pp. 289-298). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. O'REGAN, J. K. (1990). Eye movements and reading. In E. Kowler (Ed.), Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes (pp. 395-453). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
29. O'REGAN, J. K., LÉVY-SCHOEN, A., PYNTE, J., & BRUGAILLÈRE, B. (1984). Convenient fixation location within isolated words of different length and structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 250-257.
30. RADACH, R., & MCCONKIE, G. (1998). Determinants of fixation positions in reading. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 77-100). Oxford: Elsevier.
31. RAYNER, K. (1979). Eye guidance in reading: Fixation location within words. Perception, 8, 21-30.
32. RAYNER, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
33. RAYNER, K., MCCONKIE, G. W., & ZOLA, D. (1980) Integrating information across eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 206-226.
34. RAYNER, K., & MORRIS, R. K. (1992). Eye movement control in reading: Evidence against semantic preprocessing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 163-172.
35. RAYNER, K., SERENO, S. C., & RANEY, G. E. (1996). Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 1188-1200.
36. RAYNER, K., WELL, A. D., & POLLATSEK, A. (1980). Asymmetry of the effective visual field in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 537-544.
37. REICHLE, E. D., POLLATSEK, A., FISHER, D. L., & RAYNER, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125-157.
38. REICHLE, E. D., RAYNER, K., & POLLATSEK, A. (2003). The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 26, 445-526.
39. REILLY, R. G., & O'REGAN, J. K. (1998). Eye movement control during reading: A simulation of some word-targeting strategies. Vision Research, 38, 303-317.
40. SHILLCOCK, R., ELLISON, T. M., & MONAGHAN, P. (2000). Eye-fixation behavior, lexical storage, and visual word recognition in a split processing model. Psychological Review, 107, 824-851.
41. UNDERWOOD, G., CLEWS, S., & EVERATT, J. (1990). How do readers know where to look next? Local information distributions influence eye fixations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42A, 39-65.
42. UNDERWOOD, N. R., & MCCONKIE, G. W. (1985). Perceptual span for letter distinctions during reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 153-162.
43. VERGILINO, D., & BEAUVILLAIN, C. (2000). The planning of refixation saccades in reading. Vision Research, 40, 3527-3538.
44. VERGILINO-PEREZ, D., & BEAUVILLAIN, C. (2004). The ability of the saccadic system to change motor plans in scanning letter strings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 332-337.
45. VITU, F. (1991a). The existence of a centre of gravity effect in reading. Vision Research, 31, 1289-1313.
46. VITU, F. (1991b). The influence of parafoveal preprocessing and linguistic context on the optimal landing position effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 58-75.
47. VITU, F., MCCONKIE, G., KERR, P., & O'REGAN, J. K. (2001). Fixation location effects on fixation durations during reading: An inverted optimal viewing position effect. Vision Research, 41, 3513-3533.
48. VITU, F., O'REGAN, J. K., INHOFF, A. W., & TOPOLSKI, R. (1995). Mindless reading: Eye-movement characteristics are similar in scanning letter strings and reading texts. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 352-364.
49. VITU, F., O'REGAN, J. K., & MITTAU, M. (1990). Optimal landing position in reading isolated words and continuous text. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 583-600.