Collecting and using employer-worker matched data

Sociological Focus

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 81-95

  Kmec, Julie A ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 12344287902     PISSN: 00380237     EISSN: 21621128     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00380237.2003.10570717     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Abowd, John M. and Francis Kramarz. 1999. “The Analysis of Labor Markets Using Matched Employer- Employee Data.” Pp. 2629-2710 in Handbook of Labor Economics, edited by Orley Ashenfelter and David Card. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland
2. Allison, Paul D. 2001. Missing Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
3. Aldrich, Howard, Arne Kalleberg, Peter Marsden, and James Cassell. 19S9. “In Pursuit of Evidence: Sampling Procedures for Locating New Businesses.” Journal of Business Venturing 4:367-386
4. Baron, James and William Bielby. 1980. “Bringing the Firms Back In: Stratification, Segmentation, and the Organization of Work.” American Sociological Review 49:464-473
5. Bayard, Kimberly, Judith Hallerstein, David Neumark, and Kenneth Troske. 1998. “Why Are Racial and Ethnic Wage Gaps Larger for Men than for Women? Exploring the Role of Segregation Using the New Worker-Establishment Characteristics Database.” Working Paper No. 98-13, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO
6. Bayard, Kimberly, Judith Hallerstein, David Neumark, and Kenneth Troske. 1999. “Why Are Racial and Ethnic Wage Gape Larger for Men than for Women? Exploring the Role of Segregation Using the New Worker-Establishment Characteristics Database.” Pp. 175-204 in The Creation and Analysis of Employer-Employee Matched Data, edited by John C. Haltiwanger, Julia I. Lane, James R. Spletzer, Jules J. M. Theeuwea, and Kenneth R. Troske. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science
7. Bayard, Kimberly, Joel Elvery, Judith Hellerstein, and David Neumark. 2002. The 1990 Decennial Employee Employee Dataset.” Working paper CES-WP-02-23. U.S. Bureau of the Census, Center for Economic Studies. Washington, DC
8. Bridges, William P. and Wayne J. Villemez. 1994. The Employment Relationship: Causes and Consequences of Modern Personnel Administration. New York: Plenum Press
9. Cappelli, Peter. 2001. “The National Employer Survey: Employer Data on Employment Practice•.’ Industrial Relations 40:635-647
10. Dun and Bradstreet. 2002. “The New and Enhanced Business Information Report’ (https: Zwww.dnb.com/product/ebiifintro.index.htin)
11. Gates, Gerald. 1998. “Confidentiality of linked Data.” Monthly Labor Review 121:50-51
12. Gittleman, Maury, Michael Horrigan, and Mary Joyce. 1998. “Flexible’ Workplace Practices: Evidence from a Nationally Representative Survey.* Industrial and Labor Relations Review 52:99-115
13. Haltiwanger, John. 1998. “Creating Employer-Employee Data Sets.” Monthly Labor Review 121:49-50
14. Haltiwanger, John C., Julia I. Lane, James R. Spletzer, Jules J. M. Theeuwes, and Kenneth R. Troske. 1998. “International Symposium on linked Employer-Employee Data.” Monthly Labor Review 121:48-49
15. Haltiwanger, John C., Julia I. Lane, James R. Spletzer, Jules J. M. Theeuwes, and Kenneth R. Troske. 1999. The Creation and Analysis of Employer-Employee Matched Data. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science
16. Haveman, Heather A. 2000. “The Future of Organizational Sociology: Forging Ties Among Paradigms.* Contemporary Sociology 29:476-485
17. Hodson, Randy. 1983. Workers’Earnings and Corporate Economic Structure. New York: Academic Press
18. Hodson, Randy. 1984. “Companies, Industries, and the Measurement of Economic Segmentation.” American Sociological Review 49:335-348
19. Kalleberg, Arne. 1994. “Studying Employers and Their Employees: Comparative Approaches.” Acta Sociologica 37:223-229
20. Kalleberg, Aim L., Peter V. Marsden, Howard E. Aldrich, and James W. Cassell. 1990. “Comparing Organizational Sampling Frame».” Administrative Science Quarterly 35:658-688
21. Kalleberg Arne L., David Knoke, and Peter V. Marsden. 1995. “Interorganizational Networks and the Changing Employment Contract.” Presented at the International Social Network Conference, July, London
22. Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. 1977. Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic
23. Kelly, Erin and Frank Dobbin. 1999. “Civil Rights Law at Work: Sex Discrimination and the Rise of Maternity Leave Policies.” American Journal of Sociology 105:455-492
24. Krebs, Howard, Zdenek Patak, Garnett Picot, and Ted Wannell. 1999. “The Development and Use of a Canadian Linked Employer-Employee Survey.” Pp. 515-534 in The Creation and Analysis of Employer- Employee Matched Data, edited by John C. Haltiwanger, Julia I. Lane, James R. Spletzer, Jules J. M. Theeuwes, and Kenneth R. Troske. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science
25. Lane, Julia, Javier Miranda, James Speltzer, and Simon Burgees. 1999. “The Effect of Worker Reallocation on the Earnings Distribution: Longitudinal Evidence from Linked Data.” Pp. 345-374 in The Creation and Analysis of Employer-Employee Matched Data, edited by John C. Haltiwanger, Julia I. Lane, James R. Spletzer, Jules J. M. Theeuwes, and Kenneth R. Troske. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science
26. Lane, Julia and Tim Maloney. 2002. “Overview: The New Zealand Conference on Database Integration and linked Employer-Employee Data.” (http-y/www.dileed.govt.nz/summaries/overview.pdf)
27. Leonard, Jonathan S., Benoit Mulkay, and Marc Van Audenrode. 1999. “Compensation Policies and Firm Productivity.” Pp. 79-114 in The Creation and Analysis of Employer-Employee Matched Data, edited by John C. Haltiwanger, Julia I. Lane, James R. Spletzer, Jules J. M. Theeuwes, and Kenneth R. Troske. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science
28. Mairesse, Jacques and Nathalie Greenan. 1999. “Using Employee Level Data in a Firm Econometric Study.” Working Paper 7028, National Bureau of Economic Research
29. Mastekaasa, Arne. 1992. “Organizational Contexts and Individual Behavior: Potential and Limitations of the Norwegian Study of Organizations.” Acta Sociologica 35:141-150
30. McPherson, J. Miller. 1982. “Hypernetwork Sampling: Duality and Differentiation Among Voluntary Organizations.’ Social Networks 3:225-249
31. Moss, Phillip and Chris Tilly. 2001. Stories Employers Tell: Race, Skill, and Hiring in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation
32. Nelson, Phillip and Solomon W. Polachek. 1995. “Discerning Discrimination: Does Interviewing Firms Make a Difference?” Eastern Economic Journal 21:393-398
33. Nelson, Robert L. and William P. Bridges. 1999. Legalizing Gender Inequality: Courts, Markets, and Unequal Pay for Women in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
34. Osterman, Paul. 2000. “Work Reorganization in an Era of Restructuring: Trends in Diffusion and Effects on Employee Welfare.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 59:179-196
35. Parcel, Toby L., Robert L. Kaufman, and Leeann Jolly. 1991. “Going Up The Ladder. Multiplicity Sampling to Create Linked Macro-to-Micro Organizational Samples.” Sociological Methodology 21:43-79
36. Reskin, Barbara F. 2000. “Getting it Right: Sex and Race Inequality in Work Organizations.* Annual Review of Sociology 26:707-709
37. Reskin, Barbara F. 2002. “How Did the Poison G«t in Mr. Bartlett’s Stomach? Motives and Mechanisms in Modeling Inequality.” Presidential Address, American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, August 17, Chicago, IL
38. Reskin, Barbara F., Debra B. McBrier, and Julie A. Kmec. 1999. “The Determinants and Consequences of Workplace Sex and Race Composition* Annual Review of Sociology 25:336-361
39. Skaggs, Sheryl. 2002. “Producing Change or Bagging Opportunity? The Effects of Discrimination Litigation on Women and Minorities in Supermarket Management.* Paper presented at the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, August, Chicago, IL
40. Troeke, Kenneth. 1998. The Worker-Establishment Characteristics Database” Pp. 371-404 in Labor Statistic* Measurement Issues, edited by John Haltiwanger, Marilyn E. Manser, and Robert Topel. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
41. Weinberg, Daniel H. 1998. “Program Development and Policy Analysis.” Monthly Labor Review 121:57-58