Institutional ownership and CEO compensation: A longitudinal examination

Journal of Business Research

Volumn 58, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 1078-1088

  Khan, Raihan ^a   Dharwadkar, Ravi ^b   Brandes, Pamela ^b  

^a SUNY POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Corporate governance; Executive compensation; Institutional ownership

Indexed keywords

EID: 12344281216     PISSN: 01482963     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bathala C.T. Determinants of managerial stock ownership: The case of CEOs Financ. Rev. 31 (1) 1996 127-147.
2. Beatty R.P. Zajac E.J. Managerial incentives, monitoring and risk bearing: A study of executive compensation, ownership, and board structure in initial public offerings Adm. Sci. Q. 39 1994 313-335.
3. Berle A. Means G. The modern corporation and private property 1932 Macmillan New York.
4. Bethel J.E. Liebeskind J.P. The effects of ownership structure on corporate restructuring Strateg. Manage. J. 14 1993 15-31.
5. Bethel J.E. Liebeskind J.P. Opler T. Block share purchases and corporate performance J. Finances 53 (2) 1998 605-634.
6. Bhide A. Efficient markets, deficient governance Harvard Bus. Rev. 72 (6) 1994 128-139.
7. Brandes P. Dharwadkar R. Lemesis G.V. Effective employee stock option design: Reconciling stakeholder, strategic, and motivational factors Acad. Manage. Exec. 17 (1) 2003 77-93.
8. Bushee B.J. The influence of institutional investors on myopic R-D investment behavior Access Rev. 73 (3) 1998 305-333.
9. Carleton W.T. Nelson J.M. Weisbach M.S. The influence of institutions on corporate governance through private negotiations: Evidence from TIAA-CREF J. Finances 53 (4) 1998 1335-1362.
10. Coffee J.C. Liquidity versus control: The institutional investor as corporate monitor Columbia Law Rev. 91 (6) 1991 1277-1368.
11. Cubbin J. Leech D. The effects of shareholding dispersion on the degree of control in British companies: Theory and measurement Econ. J. 93 1983 351-369.
12. David P. Kochhar R. Barriers to effective governance by institutional investors: Implications for theory and practice Eur. Manage. J. 14 1996 457-466.
13. David P. Kochhar R. Levitas E. The effect of institutional investors on the level and mix of CEO compensation Acad. Manage. J. 41 (2) 1998 200-208.
14. Davis G.F. Thompson T.A. A social movement perspective on corporate control Adm. Sci. Q. 39 1994 141-173.
15. Eisenhardt K. Agency theory: An assessment and review Acad. Manage. Rev. 14 1989 57-74.
16. Finkelstein S. Hambrick D.C. Chief executive compensation Strateg. Manage. J. 10 (2) 1989 121-135.
17. Fredric, W., Cook, and Co. 9/24/01. CalPERS Proxy Voting. www.fwcook.com 9/26/01.
18. Gomez-Mejia L.R. Executive compensation: A reassessment and a future research agenda In: Ferris G. editor. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management vol. 12 1994 161-222 JAI Press Greenwich (CT).
19. Gomez-Mejia L. Wiseman R.M. Reframing executive compensation: an assessment and outlook J. Manage. 23 1997 291-374.
20. Hambrick D.C. Finkelstein S. The effects of ownership structure on conditions at the top: The case of CEO pay raises Strateg. Manage. J. 16 1995 175-193.
21. Hartzell J.C. Starks L.T. Institutional investors and executive compensation AFA 2003 Meetings Washington (DC).
22. Hill C.W.L. Snell S.A. Effects of ownership structure and control on corporate productivity Acad. Manage. J. 32 (1) 1989 25-46.
23. Holderness C.G. Kroszner R.S. Sheehan D.P. Were the good old days that good? Changes in managerial stock ownership since the great depression J. Finances 54 (2) 1999 435-469.
24. Hoskisson R.E. Turk T.A. Corporate restructuring: Governance and control limits of the internal capital market Acad. Manage. Rev. 15 1990 459-477.
25. Hoskisson R.E. Hitt M.A. Johnson R.A. Grossman W. Conflicting voices: The effects of institutional ownership heterogeneity and internal governance on corporate innovation strategies Acad. Manage. J. 45 (4) 2002 697-716.
26. Hsiao C. Analysis of panel data 1986 Cambridge Univ. Press New York.
27. Jensen M. Meckling W. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure J. Financ. Econ. 3 1976 305-360.
28. Kabir R. Cantrijn D. Jeunink A. Takeover defenses, ownership structure and stock returns in the Netherlands: An empirical analysis Strateg. Manage. J. 18 (2) 1997 97-109.
29. Lambert R.A. Larcker D.F. Weigelt K. How sensitive is executive compensation to organizational size? Strateg. Manage. J. 12 (5) 1991 395-402.
30. Lavelle L. Jespersen F.F. Arndt M. Executive pay Bus. Week 2002 80-100 [15 April].
31. Mehran H. Executive compensation structure, ownership, and firm performance J. Financ. Econ. 38 (2) 1995 163-184.
32. The Economist Have the fat cats had their day? Economist 367 (8325) 2003 63-64.
33. Thomsen S. Pedersen T. Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest European companies Strateg. Manage. J. 21 2000 689-705.
34. Tosi H. Gomez-Mejia L. CEO compensation monitoring and firm performance Acad. Manage. J. 37 1994 1002-1016.
35. Wilcox J.C. Ending the stalemate: Take a second look at the SEC's 1997 Release 34-39093 Corp. Gov. Advis. 9 (1) 2001 1-2.
36. Wright P. Ferris S.P. Sarin A. Awasthi V. Impact of corporate insider, blockholder, and institutional equity ownership on firm risk taking Acad. Manage. J. 39 (2) 1996 441-463.
37. Yermack D. Do corporations award CEO stock options effectively? J. Financ. Econ. 39 1995 237-259.
38. Zajac E.J. Westphal J.D. The costs and benefits of managerial incentives and monitoring in large U.S. corporations: When is more not better? Strateg. Manage. J. 15 1994 121-142.