Evaluation of multienvironment trials of peanut cultivars

Crop Science

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 18-26

  Casanoves, F ^a   Baldessari, J ^b   Balzarini, M ^c  

^a CATIE   (Costa Rica)

^b INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE TECNOLOGÍA AGROPECUARIA   (Argentina)

^c UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CÓRDOBA   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMMI; AMMI VISNAGA; ARACHIS; ARACHIS HYPOGAEA;

EID: 12344280191     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2005.0018     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Allard, R.W., and A.D. Bradshaw. 1964. Implications of genotype-environmental interactions in applied plant breeding. Crop Sci. 4:503-508.
2. Balzarini, M. 2000. Biometrical models for predicting future performance in plant breeding. Ph.D. Diss., Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
3. Balzarini, M. 2002. Applications of mixed models in plant breeding. p. 353-363. In M.S. Kang (ed.) Quantitative genetics, genomics, and plant breeding. CABI Publishing, New York.
4. Cornelius, P.L., J. Crossa, and M.S. Seyedsadr. 1996. Statistical test and estimates of multivariate models for genotype-by-environment interaction. p. 199-234. In M.S. Kang and H.G. Gauch (ed.) Genotype-by-environment interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
5. Francis, T.R., and L.W. Kannenberg. 1978. Yield stability studies in short season maize: I. Descriptive method for grouping genotypes. Can. J. Plant Sci. 58:1029-1034.
6. Gabriel, K.R. 1971. Biplot display of multivariate matrices with application to principal components analysis. Biometrika 58:453-467.
7. Gauch, H.G., Jr. 1988. Model selection and validation for yield trials with interaction. Biometrics 44:705-715.
8. Info-Gen. 2003. Info-Gen Versión 1. FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.
9. Jennrich, R.L., and M.D. Schluchter. 1986. Unbalanced repeated measures models with structured covariance matrices. Biometrics 42:805-820.
10. Kang, M.S. 2002. Genotype-environment interaction: Progress and prospects. p. 221-243. In M.S. Kang (ed.) Quantitative genetics, genomics, and plant breeding. CABI Publishing, New York.
11. Littell, R.C. G.A Milliken, W.W. Stroup, and R.D. Wolfinger. 1996. SAS® System for mixed models. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
12. Piepho, H.P. 1998. Empirical best linear unbiased prediction in cultivar trials using factor-analytic variance-covariance structures. Theor. Appl. Genet. 97:195-201.
13. SAS Institute. 1997. SAS/STAT software: Changes and enhancements through release 6.12. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.
14. Shukla, G.K. 1972. Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability. Heredity 29:237-245.
15. Stroup, W.W. 2000. Mixed models issues in the analysis of multi-location trials. p. 135-142. In The XXth International Biometrics Conference, Vol. II. University of California, Berkeley.
16. Yan, W., L. A. Hunt, Q. Sheng, and Z. Szlavnics. 2000. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on GGE Biplot. Crop Sci. 40:597-605.
17. Yan, W., and L.A. Hunt. 2002. Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data. p. 289-303. In M.S. Kang (ed.) Quantitative genetics, genomics, and plant breeding. CABI Publishing, New York.
18. Yan, W., and M.S. Kang. 2003. GGE biplot analysis: A graphical tool for breeders, geneticists, and agronomists. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.