Empirical best linear unbiased prediction in cultivar trials using factor-analytic variance-covariance structures

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

Volumn 97, Issue 1-2, 1998, Pages 195-201

  Piepho, Hans Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KASSEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Additive main effects multiplicative interaction (AMMI); Brassica napus L.; Cross validation; Genotype by environment interaction; Mean squared error of prediction; Mixed model; Restricted maximum likelihood (REML); Shifted multiplicative model (SHMM)

Indexed keywords

ABACA; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTOR; CULTIVAR; GENETIC VARIANCE; GENOTYPE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0031874045     PISSN: 00405752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s001220050885     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Cornelius PL, Crossa J, Seyedsadr MS (1994) Tests and estimators of multiplicative models for variety trials. Proc 1993 Kansas State Univ. Conf. on Applied Statistics in Agriculture. Manhatten. Kansas, pp 156-169
2. Cornelius PL, Crossa J, Seyedsadr MS (1996) Statistical tests and estimators of multiplicative models for genotype by environment data. In: Kang MS, Gauch HG Jr (eds) Genotype by environment interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 199-234
3. Denis JB, Gower JC (1996) Asymptotic confidence regions for biadditive models: interpreting genotype-environment interactions. Appl Statistics 45 : 479-493
4. Denis JB, Piepho HP, van Eeuwijk FA (1997) Modelling expectation and variance for genotype by environment data. Heredity 79 : 162-171
5. Eeuwijk FA van, Keizer LCP, Bakker JJ (1995) Linear and bilinear models for the analysis of multi-environment trials. II. An application to data from Dutch Maize Variety Trials. Euphytica 84 : 9-22
6. Gauch HG Jr (1988) Model selection and validation for yield trials with interaction. Biometrics 44: 705-715
7. Gauch HG Jr (1992) Statistical analysis of regional yield trials. Elsevier, Amsterdam
8. Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Verbyla AP (1995) REML estimation of multiplicative effects in multi-environment variety trials. Biometrics 51 : 744-749
9. Hill RR Jr, Rosenberger JL (1985) Methods for combining data from germplasm evaluation trials. Crop Sci 25 : 467-470
10. Jennrich RL, Schluchter MD (1986) Unbalanced repeated-measures models with structured covariance matrices. Biometrics 42 : 805-820
11. Oman SD (1991) Multiplicative effects in mixed model analysis of variance. Biometrika 78 : 729-739
12. Piepho HP (1994) Best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) for regional yield trials: a comparison to additive main effects multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis. Theor Appl Genet 89 : 647-654
13. Piepho HP (1997 a) Analyzing genotype-environment data by mixed models with multiplicative effects. Biometrics 53 : 761-766
14. Piepho HP (1997 b) Mixed models with multiplicative terms for cultivar trial data. In: Krajewski P, Kaczmarek Z (eds) Advances in biometrical genetics. Proc 10th Meet EUCARPIA Sect Biometrics in Plant Breeding, Poznan, Poland, 14-16 May 1997, pp 215-220
15. Piepho HP, Denis JB, van Eeuwijk FA (1998) Predicting cultivar differences using covariates. Jour Agri, Biol, Envir Stat (in press)
16. Robinson GK (1991) That BLUP is a good thing: the estimation of random effects. Stat Sci 6 : 15-51
17. SAS Institute (1997) SAS/STAT software: changes and enhancements through release 6.12. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA
18. Searle SR, Casella G, McCulloch CE (1992) Variance components. Wiley, New York
19. Seyedsadr M, Cornelius PL (1992) Shifted multiplicative models for nonadditive two-way tables. Commun Stat B 21 : 807-832
20. Stroup WW, Mulitze DK (1991) Nearest neighbor adjusted best linear unbiased prediction. Am Stat 45 : 194-200
21. Weber WE, Westermann T (1994) Prediction of yield for specific locations in German winter wheat trials. Plant Breed 113 : 99-105
22. Wolfinger RD (1996) Heterogeneous variance-covariance structures for repeated measures. Jour Agric, Biol, Env Stat 1 : 205-230