Falling from a great height: Principles of good practice in performance measurement and the perils of top down determination of performance indicators

Local Government Studies

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 21-38

  Jackson, Annabel ^a  

^a Annabel Jackson Associates   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LOCAL GOVERNMENT; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT;

EID: 12344270731     PISSN: 03003930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0300393042000332837     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Argyris, C. & Schön D.A. (1978) Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley).
2. Atkinson, A.A. & Waterhouse, J.H. (1997) A stakeholder approach to strategic performance measurement', Sloan Management Review, 38(3), pp.25-37.
3. Audit Commission (2003) Targets in the Public Sector (London: HMSO).
4. Austin, R.D. (1996) Measuring and Managing Performance in Organizations (New York: Dorset House).
5. Austin, R.D., Larkey, P.D. & Royo, J. (1998) Measuring knowledge work: pathologies and patterns, in: Andy D. Neely (Ed.) Performance Measurement - Theory and Practice (Cambridge: Centre for Business Performance, Cambridge University).
6. Behn, R.D. (2003) Why measure performance: different purposes require different measures? Public Administration Review, 63(5), pp.586-606.
7. Bititci, U.S. & Turner, T. (2000) Dynamics of Performance Measurement Systems, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 20(6), pp.692-704.
8. Blackman, T. (1998) Towards evidence-based local government: theory and practice, Local Government Studies, 24(2), pp.56-70.
9. Bovaird, T. (2000) Strategic objective maps as 'windows' into worlds of cause-and-effect, in: Proceedings of the British Academy of Management Annual Conference (Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh), pp.13-15.
10. Bowerman, M., Francis, G., Ball, A. & Fry, J. (2002) The evolution of benchmarking in UK local authorities, Benchmarking: An International Journal, 9(5), pp.429-449.
11. Chen, H.-T. (1990) Theory-Driven Evaluations (London: Sage).
12. Choudhary, A. & Tandon, R. (1988) Participatory Evaluation (New Delhi: Society for Participatory Research in Asia).
13. De Bruijn, H. (2002a) Performance measurement in the public sector: strategies to cope with the risks of performance measurement, The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15(7), pp.578-94.
14. De Bruijn, H. (2002b) Managing Performance in the Public Sector (London: Routledge).
15. Fetterman, D.M., Kaftarian, S.J. & Wandersman, A. (Eds.) (1996) Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self Assessment and Accountability (London: Sage).
16. Fitzgerald, L. & Moon, P. (1996) Performance Measurement in Service Industries: Making it Work (London: CIMA).
17. Fiske, E.B. & Ladd, H.F. (2000) When Schools Compete: a Cautionary Tale (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute).
18. Gewirtz, S. (2002) Achieving success? critical reflections on New Labour's 'Third Way' agenda for education. Keynote lecture to international meeting on Curriculum Politics, Oporto, May.
19. Gianakis, G.A. (2002) The promise of public sector performance measurement: anodyne or placebo? Public Administration Quarterly, 26(1).
20. Gray, A. (1997) Contract culture and target fetishism, the distortive effects of output measures on local regeneration programmes, Local Economy, 11(4), pp.343-357.
21. Greene, J.C, Benjamin, L, & Goodyear, L. (2001) The merits of mixing methods in evaluation, Evaluation, 7(1), pp.25-44.
22. Guba, E.G. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1989) Fourth Generation Evaluation (London: Sage).
23. Halachmi, A. (2002) Performance measurement: a look at some possible dysfunctions, Work Study, 51(5), pp.230-39.
24. House, E.R. (1980) Evaluating with Validity (London: Sage).
25. House, E.R. (1994) Integrating the quantitative and qualitative, in: C. Reichardt & S.F. Rallis, The Qualitative- Quantitative Debate: New Perspectives. New Directions for Evaluation, 61 (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).
26. Hronec, S.M. (1993) Vital Signs: Using Quality, Time, and Cost Performance Measurements to Chart Your Company's Future (New York: AMACOM).
27. Ittner, C.D. & Larcker, D.F. (2003) Harvard Business Review, November 2003.
28. Jackson, A. (2002) A classification of gaming, in: A. Neely and A. Walters (Eds.) Performance Measurement and Management: Research and Action (Cranfield: Centre for Business Performance).
29. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (1994) The Program Evaluation Standards: How to Assess Evaluations of Educational Programs. 2nd Edn. (London: Sage).
30. Kaplan, R.S. & Norton, D.P. (1998) Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system, in: Harvard Business Review on Measuring Corporate Performance (Boston: Harvard Business School Press).
31. Kaplan, R.S. & Norton D.P.(1992) The balanced scorecard - measures that drive performance, Harvard Business Review, January-February, pp.71-79.
32. Likierman, A. (1993) Performance indicators: 20 early lessons from managerial use, Public Money and Management, 13(4), pp.15-22.
33. MacDonald, B. (1976) A political classification of evaluation studies, in: D. Hamilton (Ed.) Beyond the Numbers Game (London: Macmillan).
34. Marr, B. & Schiuma, G. (2003) Business performance measurement: past, present and future, Management Decision, 41(8), pp.680-687.
35. Martins, R.A. (2000) Use of performance measurement systems: some thoughts towards a comprehensive approach, in: A. Neely (Ed.) Performance Measurement - Past, Present and Future (Cranfield: Cranfield University School of Management).
36. Meyer, M.W. (2002) Rethinking Performance Measurement: Beyond the Balanced Scorecard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
37. National Audit Office (2001) Inappropriate Adjustments to NHS Waiting Lists, Report to the Comptroller and Auditor General (London: the Stationery Office).
38. Neely, A. (1999) The performance measurement revolution: why now and what next? International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 19(2), pp.205-228.
39. Neely, A. (2001) The performance prism in practice, Measuring Business Excellence, 5(2), pp.6-12.
40. Neely, A., Gregory, M. & Platts, K. (1995) Performance measurement system design: a literature review and research agenda, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 15(4), pp.80-116.
41. O'Neill, O. (2002) A question of trust. BBC, Reith Lectures.
42. Patton, M.Q. (1996) Utilization-Focused Evaluation. 3rd Edn. (London: Sage).
43. Perry, A. (2000) Performance indicators: measure for measure or a comedy of errors? in: C. Mager & P. Robinson (Eds.) The New Learning Market (London, FEDA).
44. Power, M. (1994) The Audit Explosion (London: Demos).
45. Reichardt, C.S. & Cook, T.D. (1979) Beyond qualitative versus quantitative methods, in: T.D. Cook & C.S. Reichardt (Eds.) Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research (Newbury Park, CA: Sage).
46. Ridgway, V.F. (1956) Dysfunctional consequences of performance measurements, Administrative Science Quarterly, 1(2), pp.240-247.
47. Sanderson, I. (1998) Beyond performance measurement? assessing 'value' in local government, Local Government Studies, 24(4), pp.1-25.
48. Scriven, M. (1976) Evaluation bias and its control, Evaluation Studies Review Annual, 1, pp. 119-39.
49. Seigart, D. & Brisolara, S. (2002) Feminist evaluation, explorations and experiences, in: New Directions for Evaluation, 96 (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).
50. Shadish, W.J., Cook, T.D. & Leviton, L.C. (1995) Foundations of Program Evaluation. Theories of Practice (London: Sage).
51. Slater, S.F. & Olsen, E.M. (1997) Strategy-based performance measurement', Business Horizons, 40(4), p.37.
52. Smith, M.L. (1994) Qualitative plus/versus quantitative: the last word, in: C. Reichardt & S.F. Rallis (Eds.) The Qualitative-Quantitative Debate: New Perspectives. New Directions for Evaluation, 61 (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).
53. Stake, R.E. (1975) Evaluating the Arts in Education: a Responsive Approach (Columbus, OH: Merrill).
54. Stewart, J. & Walsh, K. (1994) Performance measurement: when performance can never be finally defined, Public Money and Management, 14(2), pp.43-49.
55. Stufflebeam, D.L. (2001) Evaluation models, in: New Directions for Evaluation, 89 (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).
56. Tomorrow's Company (1999) The Inclusive Approach and Business Success (London: Tomorrow's Company).
57. Vince, R. & Broussine, M. (2000) Rethinking organisational learning in local government, Local Government Studies, 26(1), pp. 15-30.
58. Weiss, C.H. (1988) Evaluation for decisions: is anyone there? does anyone care? Evaluation Practice, 9(1), pp.5-19.
59. Wisniewski, M. & Stewart, D. (2004) Performance measurement for stakeholders: the case of Scottish local authorities, The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(3), pp.222-233.