Teacher training about real-time approaches: Research-based guidelines and training materials

Science Education

Volumn 89, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 28-37

  Sassi, Elena ^a   Monroy, Gabriella ^a   Testa, Italo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 12344255262     PISSN: 00368326     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sce.20041     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Benigno, E., Olimpo, G., & Tavella, M. (2000). Multimedia in education: An experience in the propagation of teachers' skills. In Proceeding of Conference on Educational Uses of Informatic and Communication Technologies (pp. 289-295). Beijing: Publishing House of Electronics Industry.
2. Black, P., & Atkin, J. M. (Eds.). (1996). Changing the subject: Innovations in science, mathematics and technology education. London: Routledge.
3. Carmichael M., Driver R., & Holding C. (1993). Research on students' conceptions in science: A bibliography. Leads, UK: University of Leeds.
4. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (1998). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. London: SAGE Publications.
5. Ellermeijer, T., & Heck, A. (2001). Differences between the use of mathematical entities in mathematics and physics and the consequences for an integrated learning environment. First International GIREP Seminar Developing Formal Thinking In Physics [online]. Abstract retrieved April 15, 2002, from http://web.uniud.it/cird/GirepSeminar2001/Abstracts/abstract.htm
6. FISISS (1997). Unpublished Proposal for National Project: Formazione in Servizio Insegnanti Scuola Secondaria Superiore. Coordinator: P. Guidoni, Università "Federico II," Napoli.
7. Kaye, A. R. (1991). Learning together apart. Proceedings of Nato Advanced Research Workshop on Collaborative Learning and Computer Conferencing. In R. F. Tinker (Ed.), Series F, computer and systems science (p. 90). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
8. Kouladis, V., & Ogborn, J. (1989). Philosophy of science: An empirical study of teachers' views. International Journal of Science Education, 11(2), 173-184.
9. Lakin, S., & Wellington, J. (1994). Who will teach the "nature of science"? Teachers' views of science and their implications for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 175-190.
10. Lunetta, V. N. (1998). The school science laboratory: Historical prospectives and contexts for contemporary teaching. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education, Part 2 (pp. 249-262). London: Kluwer.
11. Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction-A user's manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12. Mellado, V. (1998). The class room practice of preservice teachers and their conceptions of teaching and learning science. Science Education, 82(2), 197-214.
13. Merrian, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. Michelini, M., Santi, L., & Sperandeo, R. M. (Eds.). (2002). Proposte Didattiche su Forze e Movimento. Udine, Italy: Forum Editrice.
15. Miles, M. B., & Humberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data anlysis. A sourcebook of new methods. London: SAGE.
16. Osborne, J, & Millar, R. (Eds.). (2001). Beyond 2000-Science education for the future [online]. Retrieved April 15, 2002, from http://www.kcl.ac.uk/depsta/education/be2000/index.html
17. Pfundt, H., & Duit, R. (1994). Students' alternative framework and science education. Kiel, Germany: IPN (Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften).
18. Pintó, R. (2005). Introducing curriculum innovations in science: Identifying teachers' transformations and the design of related teacher education. Science Education, 89, 1-12.
19. Pintó, R., Ametler, J., Chauvet, F., Colin, P., Giberti, G., Monroy, G., Ogborn, J., Ormerod, F., Sassi, E., Stylianidou, F., Testa, I., & Viennot, L. (2000). Investigation on the difficulties in teaching and learning graphic representations and on their use in science classrooms. STTIS Report RW2 [online]. Retrieved March 15, 2003, from http://www.blues.uab.es/ ∼idmc42
20. Pintó, R., Gutierrez, R., & Couso, D. (2000). Teaching about energy degradation. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona [online]. Retrieved March 15, 2003, from http://www.blues.uab.es/∼idmc42
21. Sassi, E. (1995). Esperimenti in tempo reale e didattica della fisica. Tecnologie Didattiche, 7, 46-55 (in Italian).
22. Sassi, E. (1997a). Addressing some common learning-teaching difficulties in basic physics courses through computer based activities. In S. Oblak, M. Hribar, K. Luchner, & M. Munih (Eds.), Proceedings of GIREP-ICPE International Conference 1996, New ways of teaching physics (pp. 162-179). Ljubljana, Slovenia: Board of Education of Slovenia.
23. Sassi, E. (1997b). Computer-based laboratory to address learning/teaching difficulties in basic physics. In Proceedings of ESERA Summer School on Theory and Methodology of Research in Science Education (pp. 55-64). Barcelona.
24. Sassi, E. (2001). Computer supported lab-work in physics education: Advantages and problems. In R. Pintó & S. Surinach (Eds.), International Conference Physics Teacher Education Beyond 2000 [CD-ROM]. Barcelona: Production Calidos.
25. Sassi, E., Monroy, G., & Testa, I. (2001 a). Research-based teacher training about real-time approaches: Some guidelines and materials. In D. Psillos, P. Kariotoglou, V. Tselfes, G. Bisdikian, G. Fassoulopous, E. Hatzikraniotis, & M. Kallery (Eds.), Proceedings of Third International ESERA Conference on Science Education Research in the Knowledge Based Society (pp. 156-158). Thessaloniki, Greece: Art of Text.
26. Sassi, E., Monroy, G., Testa, I., Ametller, J., Andresen, O., Balzano, E., Boohan., R., Chauvet, F., Colin, P., Couso, D., Giberti, G., Gutierrez., R., Hirn-Chaine, C., Ogborn, J., Pintó, R., Quale, A., Rebmann, G., Stylianidou, F., & Viennot, L. (2001b). Teacher training materials favouring the take-up of innovations, STTIS Report RW5 [online]. Available at: http://www.blues.uab.es/∼idmc42
27. Sassi, E., & Olimpo, G. (1999). The role of experimental work and information and communication technologies in science learning. In Proceedings of the Conference Teacher Training and Information Technology [CD-ROM]. Lisboa, Portugal: Forum Educaçao.
28. Séré, M. G., Leach, J., Niedderer, H., Psillos, D., Tiberghien, A., & Vicentini M. (1998). Improving science education: Issues and research on innovative empirical and computer-based approaches to labwork in Europe. LSE Final Report [online]. Retrieved April 15, 2002, from http://www.pjb.co.uk/npl/bp4.htm
29. Sokoloff, D., & Thomton, R. (1997a). Using interactive lecture demonstrations to create an active learning environment. Physics Teacher, 35(10), 340-345.
30. Sokolqff, D., & Thornton, R. (1997b). Real-time physics: Active learning laboratory. In The changing role of physics departments in modern universities: Proceedings of the International Conference on Undergraduate Physics Education (pp. 1101-1118). Woodbury, NY: American Institute of Physics.
31. Southerland, S. A., & Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Preservice teachers' views of inclusive science teaching as shaped by images of teaching, learning and knowledge. Science Education 83(2), 131-150.
32. Sperandeo-Mineo, R. M. (2000). A Net-course for physics teachers supporting collaborative learning and inquiry. Proceedings of International Conference Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education 2000, (1), 1855-1860 [online]. Abstract retrieved April 15, 2002, from http://www.aace.org/ dl/index.cfm/fuseaction/ View/paperID/774
33. Sperandeo-Mineo, R. M. (2001). I.MO.PHY. (Introduction to Modelling in PHYsics Education): A Netcourse supporting teachers in implementing tools and teaching Strategies. In R. Pinto & S. Surinach (Eds.), Physics teacher education beyond 2000 (pp. 135-140). Paris: Elsevier.
34. STTIS (1998). STTIS Report RW0 Outline and justification of research methodology: Work packages WP1, WP2 and WP3 [online]. Available at: http://www.blues.uab.es/∼idmc42
35. Stylianidou, F., Ogborn, J., Andresen, G., Balzano, E., Giberti, G., Gutierrez, R., Kolstø, S. D., Monroy, G., Pérez, O., Pintó, R., Quale, A., Rebmann, G., & Sassi, E. (2000). The nature of use by science teachers of informatic tools: STTIS Report RW1.2 [online]. Retrieved March 15, 2003, from http://www.blues.uab.es/∼idmc42
36. Testa, I., Monroy, G., & Sassi, E. (2000). Students' reading images in kinematics: The case of real-time graphs. International Journal of Science Education, 24(3), 235-256.
37. Thornton, R. (1997). Conceptual dynamics: Changing student views of force and motion. In E. F. Redish & J. S. Rigden (Eds.), The changing role of physics departments in modern universities: Proceedings of the International Conference on Undergraduate Physics Education (pp. 241-266). New York: Wiley.
38. Thornton, R. (1999). The results of research in science education to improve science learning. Proceedings of International Conference on Science Education (pp. 234-248). Nicosia, Cyprus: Cyprus Ministry of Education and Culture [online]. Abstract retrieved April 15, 2002, from http://ase.tufts.edu/ csmt/html/abstracts/cyprus.html
39. Thornton, R., & Sokoloff, D. (1997). Assessing student learning of Newton's laws: The force and motion conceptual evaluation of active learning laboratory and lecture curricula, American Journal of Physics, 66(4), 338-352.
40. Tiberghien, A., Veillard, L., Le Maréchal, J.-F., Buty, C., & Millar, R. (2001). An analysis of labwork tasks used in science teaching at upper secondary school and university levels in several European countries. Science Education, 85(5), 483-508.
41. Vicentini, M. (2001). An epistemological framework for labwork in experimental sciences. First International GIREP Seminar Developing Formal Thinking In Physics [online]. Abstract retrieved April 15, 2002, from http://web.uniud.it/cird/GirepSeminar2001/Abstracts/abstract.htm
42. Viennot, L. (1996). Raisonner en physique: La part du sens commun. Avec la contribution de A. Benseghir, H. Caldas, F. Chauvet, J. L. Closset, W. Kaminski, L. Maurines, J. Menigaux, S. Rainson, S. Rozier, & E. Saltiel. Louvain la Neuve: De Boeck.
43. Viennot, L. (2001). Reasoning in physics. The part of common sense. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
44. Viennot, L., Chauvet, F., Colin, P., & Rebmann, G. (2005). Designing strategies and tools for teacher training: The role of critical details, examples in optics. Science Education, 89, 13-27.
45. Viennot, L., Chauvet, F., Giberti, G., Gomez, R., Horn, C., Monroy, G., Ogborn, J., Pinto, R., Sassi, E., Stylianidou, F., & Testa, I. (1999). Investigation on teacher transformations when implementing teaching strategies, STTIS Report RW3 [online]. Retrieved March 15, 2003, from http://www.blues.uab. es/∼idmc42
46. Workshop Physics. (2000). Principal mentor: P. Laws, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Dickinson College [online]. Retrieved April 15, 2002, from http://physics.dickinson.edu/
47. Yin, R. K. (1989). Case study research. Design and methods. London: SAGE.