P300 cognitive potencial in free field: Applicability test;Potencial cognitivo P300 realizado em campo livre: Aplicabilidade do teste

Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia

Volumn 70, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 780-785

  Duarte, Josilene Luciene ^a   De Freitas Alvarenga, Kátia ^a   Costa, Orozimbo Alves ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Auditory; Cognition; Event related potentials; P300

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEARING ACUITY; HEARING AID; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL DISEASE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCHOOL CHILD;

EID: 12244265545     PISSN: 00347299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0034-72992004000600013     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Franco GM. O potencial evocado cognitivo em adultos normais. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2001; 59 (2-A): 198-200.
2. Chermak GD, Musiek FE. Central auditory processing disorders: new perspectives. San Diego: California Singular Publishing Group. Inc; 1997.
3. Buchwald JS. Comparison of plasticity in sensory and cognitive processing systems. Clin Perinatol 1990; 17(1):57-66.
4. Diniz Junior J, Mamgabeira-Albernaz PL, Munhoz MS, Fukuda Y. Cognitive potentials in children with learning disabilities. Acta Otolaryngol 1997; 117 (2): 211-3.
5. Goodin DS, Squires KC, Hderson BH, Starr A. Age-related variations in evoked potentials to auditory stimuli in normal human subjects. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1978; 44: 447-58.
6. Colafênima JF, Fellipe ACN, Junqueira CAO, Frizzo ACF. Potenciais evocados auditivos de longa latência (P300) em adultos jovens saudáveis: um estudo normativo. Rev Bras de Otolaringol 2000; 66 (março-abril): 144-8.
7. Oken BS. Endogenous event-related potentials. In: Chiappa KH. (ed). Evoked potentials in clinical medicine. New York: Raven Press; 1990. p. 563-92.
8. Polich J, Kok A. Cognitive and biological determinants of P300: an integrate review. Biol Psychol 1995; 41: 103-46.
9. Martinez B, Marion I. Introducción a los potenciales evocados de larga latencia: P-300. Acta Neurol Colomb 1998; 14 (3): 177-80.
10. Goodin DS, Aminoff MJ. Evaluation of dementia by event-related potentials. J Clin Neurophysiol 1992; 9(4): 521-5.
11. Kaga K, Kodera K, Hirota E, Tsuzuku T. P300 response to tones and speech sounds after cochlear implant: a case report. Laryngoscope 1991; 101 (8): 905-7.
12. Groenen PAP, Makhdoum M, Van Den Brink JL, Atollman MHP, Snik AFM, Van Den Broek P. The relation between electric auditory brain stem and cognitive responses and speech perception in cochlear implant users. Acta Otolaryngol 1996; 116: 785-90.
13. Kileny PR, Boerst A, Zwolan T. Cognitive evoked potentials to speech and tonel stimuli in children with implants. Otolaryngol Head Neack Surg 1997; 117: 161-9.
14. Okusa M, Shiraishi T, Kubo T, Nageishi Y. Effects of discrimination difficulty on cognitive event-related brain potentials in patients with cochlear implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 121: 610-5.
15. Beynon AJ, Snick AFM, Van Den Broek P. Evaluation of cochlear implant benefit with auditory cortical evoked potentials. Int J Audiol 2002; 41 (7): 429-35.
16. Kügler CFA, Taghavy A, Platt D. The event-related P300 potential analysis of cognitive human brain aging: a review. Gerontology 1993; 39: 280-303.