Value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with secretin stimulation in the evaluation of pancreatic exocrine function after pancreaticogastrostomy

Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 50-55

  Shinchi, Hiroyuki ^a   Takao, Sonshin ^a   Maemura, Kosei ^a   Fukukura, Yoshihiko ^b   Noma, Hidetoshi ^a   Matsuo, Yoichiro ^a   Mataki, Yukou ^a   Mori, Shinichiro ^a   Iino, Satoshi ^a   Ehi, Katsuhiko ^a   Aikou, Takashi ^a  

^a KAGOSHIMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KAGOSHIMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography; Pancreatic function; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Pancreaticogastrostomy

Indexed keywords

AMYLASE; BENTIROMIDE; CHYMOTRYPSIN; PANCREAS ENZYME; SECRETIN; TRIACYLGLYCEROL LIPASE; TRYPSIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT CARCINOMA; CHRONIC PANCREATITIS; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CYSTADENOMA; ENDOSCOPY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FECES ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FOURIER ANALYSIS; GASTROSTOMY; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MORPHOLOGY; PANCREAS ADENOCARCINOMA; PANCREAS ADENOMA; PANCREAS CARCINOMA; PANCREAS DUCT; PANCREAS FUNCTION; PANCREAS JUICE; PANCREAS SECRETION; PANCREAS SURGERY; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; STOMACH JUICE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VATER PAPILLA CARCINOMA;

4-AMINOBENZOIC ACID; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, MAGNETIC RESONANCE; FEMALE; GASTRIC JUICE; GASTROSTOMY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATECTOMY; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; SECRETIN;

EID: 12144287873     PISSN: 09441166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00534-003-0868-1     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Williamson RCN, Cooper MJ (1987) Resection in chronic pancreatitis. Br J Surg 74:807-812
2. Sato N, Yamaguchi K, Yokohata K, Shimizu S, Noshiro H, Mizumoto K, Chijiiwa K, Tanaka M (1998) Changes in pancreatic function after pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 176:59-61
3. Lemaire E, O'Toole D, Sauvanet A, Hammel P, Belghiti J, Ruszniewski P (2000) Functional and morphological changes in the pancreatic remnant following pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastric anastomosis. Br J Surg 87:434-438
4. Wallner BK, Schumacher KA, Weidenmaier W, Freidrich JM (1991) Dilated biliary tract: Evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography with a heavily T2-weighted contrast-enhanced fast sequence. Radiology 181:805-808
5. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK, Clarke P, Siegenberg D, Chuttani R (1995) Pancreatic duct: MR cholangiopancreatography with a three-dimensional fast spin-echo technique. Radiology 196:459-464
6. Lomanto D, Pavone P, Laghi A, Panebianco V, Mazzocchi P, Fiocca F, Lezoche E, Passariello R, Speranza V (1997) Magnetic resonance-cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases. Am J Surg 174:33-38
7. Takehara Y (1998) Can MRCP replace ERCP? J Magn Reson Imaging 8:517-534
8. Matos C, Metens T, Deviere J, Nicaise N, Braude P, Yperen GV, Cremer M, Struyven J (1997) Pancreatic duct: Morphologic and functional evaluation with dynamic MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 203:435-441
9. Nicaise N, Pellet O, Metens T, Deviere J, Braude P, Struyven J, Matos C (1998) Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: Interest of IV secretin administration in the evaluation of pancreatic ducts. Eur Radiol 8:16-22
10. Manfredi R, Costamagna G, Brizi MG, Maresca G, Vecchioli A, Colagrande C, Marano P (2000) Severe chronic pancreatitis versus suspected pancreatic disease: Dynamic MR cholangiopancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 214:849-855
11. Sho M, Nakajima Y, Kanehiro H, Hisanaga M, Nishio K, Nagao M, Tatekawa Y, Ikeda N, Kanokogi H, Yamada T, Hirohashi S, Hirohashi R, Uchida H, Nakano H (1998) A new evaluation of pancreatic function after pancreatoduodenectomy using secretin magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Am J Surg 176:279-282
12. Pessaux P, Aube C, Lebigot J, Tuech JJ, Regenet N, Kapel N, Caron C, Arnaud JP (2002) Permeability and functionality of pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy with dynamic magnetic resonance pancreatography after secretin stimulation. J Am Coll Surg 194:454-462
13. Takao S, Shimazu H, Maenohara S, Shinchi H, Aikou T (1993) A modified pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 165:317-321
14. Fukukura Y, Fujiyoshi F, Sasaki M, Ichinari N, Inoue H, Kajiya Y, Nakajo M (1999) HASTE MR cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of intraductal papillary-mucinous tumors of the pancreas. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23:301-305
15. Takada T, Yasuda H, Hasegawa H, Ando H (1995) Use of bromthymol blue, a pH indicator, for detecting the pancreatic duct orifice after resection of the head of the pancreas. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2:401-405
16. Takada T, Yasuda H, Uchiyama K. Hasegawa H, Misu Y, Iwagaki T (1995) Pancreatic enzyme activity after a pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy reconstructed with pancreaticogastrostomy. Pancreas 11:276-282
17. Sica GT, Braver J, Cooney MJ, Miller FH, Chai JL, Adams DF (1999) Comparison of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with MR cholangiopancreatography in patients with pancreatitis. Radiology 210:605-610
18. Ueno E, Takada Y, Yoshida I, Toda J, Sugiura T, Toki F (1998) Pancreatic diseases: Evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography. Pancreas 16:418-426
19. Hintze RE, Adler A, Veltzke W, Abou-Rebyeh H, Hammerstingl R, Vogl T, Felix R (1997) Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Endoscopy 29:182-187