Pancreatic diseases: Evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography

Pancreas

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 418-426

  Ueno, Eiko ^a   Takada, Yukari ^a   Yoshida, Izumi ^a   Toda, Joe ^a   Sugiura, Takashi ^a   Toki, Fumitake ^a  

^a TOKYO WOMEN'S MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

ERCP, MR; Pancreas abnormalities; Pancreatic ducts; Rapid imaging

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PANCREAS DISEASE; PANCREAS DUCT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL ANATOMY;

EID: 0031944028     PISSN: 08853177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006676-199804000-00034     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. 2-weighted contrast-enhanced fast sequence. Radiology 1991;181: 805-8.
2. Morimoto K, Shimoi M, Shirakawa T, et al. Biliary obstruction: evaluation with three-dimensional MR cholangiography. Radiology 1992;183:578-80.
3. Hall-Craggs MA, Allen CM, Owens CM, et al. MR cholangiography: clinical evaluation in 40 cases. Radiology 1993;189:423-7.
4. Ishizaki Y, Wakayama T, Okada Y, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiography for evaluation of obstructive jaundice. Am J Gastroenterol 1993;8:2072-7.
5. Guibaud L, Bret PM, Reinhold C, et al. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: value of MR cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;163:847-50.
6. Guibaud L, Bret P, Reinhold C, et al. Bile duct obstruction and choledocholithiasis: diagnosis with MR cholangiography. Radiology 1995;197:109-15.
7. Taourel P, Bret PM, Reinhold C, et al. Anatomic variants of the biliary tree: diagnosis with MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 1996;199:521-7.
8. Macaulay SE, Schulte SJ, Sekijima JH, et al. Evaluation of a non-breath-hold MR cholangiography technique. Radiology 1995; 196:227-32.
9. Takehara Y, Ichijo K, Tooyama N, et al. Breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography with a long-echo-train fast spin-echo sequence and a surface coil in chronic pancreatitis. Radiology 1994;192: 73-8.
10. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK, et al. Pancreatic duct: MR cholangiopancreatography with a three-dimensional fast spin-echo technique. Radiology 1995;196:459-64.
11. Bret PM, Reinhold C, Taourel P, et al. Pancreas divisum: evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 1996;199:99-103.
12. Barish MA, Yucel EK, Soto JA, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography: efficacy of three-dimensional turbo spin-echo technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;165:295-300.
13. Laubenberger J, Büchert M, Schneider B, et al. Breath-hold projection magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP): a new method for the examination of the bile duct and pancreatic ducts. Magn Reson Med 1995;33:18-23.
14. Reinhold C, Guibaud L, Genin G, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography: comparison between two-dimensional fast spin-echo and three-dimensional gradient-echo pulse sequence. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995;4:379-84.
15. Irimoto M, Kuwatsuru R, Katayama H, et al. MRCP (magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography) for evaluation of main pancreatic duct and side branches. Jpn J Clin Radiol 1996;41:1051-6.
16. Miyazaki T, Yamashita Y, Tsuchigame T, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography using HASTE (half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo) sequences. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166: 1297-3003.
17. Reinhold C, Bret PM. Current status of MR cholangiopancreatography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:1285-95.
18. Soto JA, Yucel EK, Barish MA, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography after unsuccessful or incomplete ERCP. Radiology 1996; 199:91-8.
19. Ichikawa T, Nitatori T, Hachiya J, et al. Breath-held MR cholangiopancreatography with half-averaged single shot hybrid rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequence: comparison of fast GRE and SE sequences. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996;20: 798-802.
20. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology 1996;110:589-97.
21. Toda J, Ueno E, Yoshida I, et al. Volume rendering of MR cholangiopancreatography. In: Selected scientific exhibits in gastrointestinal radiology: RSNA 1996 [RadioGraphics 1997;17(suppl 2, pt 2, compact disk):1616-20 (abstr.)].
22. Toda J, Ueno E, Yoshida I, et al. Volume rendering of MR cholangiopancreatography. In: Selected scientific exhibits in gastrointestinal radiology: RSNA 1996 [RadioGraphics 1997;17(suppl 2, pt 2, compact disk):1616-20 (abstr.)].
23. Todani T, Narusue M, Watanabe Y, et al. Congenital bile duct cyst: its classification, operative procedures, and review of 37 cases including cancer arising from choledochal cyst. Am J Surg 1977; 134:263-9.
24. Hirohashi S, Hirohasi R, Uchida H, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography and MR urography: improved enhancement with a negative oral contrast agent. Radiology 1997;203:281-5.
25. Bilbao MK, Dotter CT, Lee TG, et al. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a study of 10,000 cases. Gastroenterolagy 1976;70:614-320.
26. Hamilton I, Lintott DJ, Rothwell J, et al. Acute pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Clin Radiol 1983;34:543-6.
27. Homma T, Harada H, Koizumi M. Diagnostic criteria for chronic pancreatitis by the Japan Pancreas Society. Pancreas 1997;15: 14-5.
28. Committee of JSPBM for Diagnostic Criteria. Diagnostic criteria of pancreaticobiliary malfunction. J Hepat Bil Pancr Surg 1994; 1:219-21.