Visualisation of non-invasive coronary bypass imaging: 4-row vs. 16-row multidetector computed tomography

European Radiology

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 118-126

  Khan, M Fawad ^a   Herzog, Christopher ^a   Landenberger, Kai ^a   Maataoui, Adel ^a   Martens, Sven ^a   Ackermann, Hanns ^a   Moritz, Anton ^a   Vogl, Thomas J ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cardiac MDCT; Coronary arteries bypass graft; MDCT angiography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GRAFT PATENCY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERNAL MAMMARY ARTERY; LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGICAL PROCEDURES; RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY; VEIN GRAFT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; FEMALE; GRAFT OCCLUSION, VASCULAR; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 12144249418     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2521-z     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bruckenberger E (2001) Bericht der Arbeitsgruppe Krankenhauswesen der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der obersten Landesgesundheitsbehörden der Länder (AOLG). Herzbericht 14:2001
2. Berger PB, Alderman EL, Nadel A, Schaff HV (1999) Frequency of early occlusion and stenosis in a left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending artery bypass graft after surgery through a median sternotomy on conventional bypass: Benchmark for minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass. Circulation 100:2353-2358 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FlsVWgtA%3D%3D
3. Tan ES, van der Meer J, Jan de Kam P et al (1999) Worse clinical outcome but similar graft patency in women versus men one year after coronary artery bypass graft surgery owing to an excess of exposed risk factors in women. CABADAS. Research Group of the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of The Netherlands. Coronary artery bypass graft occlusion by aspirin, dipyridamole and acenocoumarol/phenoprocoumon study. J Am Coll Cardiol 34:1760-1768 10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00404-0
4. Serruys PW, Unger F, Sousa JE et al (2001) Comparison of coronary-artery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease. N Engl J Med 344:1117-1124 10.1056/NEJM200104123441502
5. Goldman S, Zadina K, Krasnicka B et al (1997) Predictors of graft patency 3 years after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group No. 297. J Am Coll Cardiol 29:1563-1568 10.1016/S0735-1097(97)82539-9
6. von Smekal A, Lachat M, Wildermuth S, Khan G, Turina M, Marincek B (2000) Proximal anastomoses of aortocoronary bypasses. Evaluation with ECG-triggered single-slice computerized tomography. Radiologe 40:130-135 10.1007/s001170050021
7. Kwok BW, Lim TT (2000) Cortical blindness following coronary angiography. Singapore Med J 41:604-605 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3jslWnsQ%3D%3D
8. Silber S, Finsterer S, Krischke I, Lochow P, Muhling H (2003) Noninvasive angiography of coronary bypass grafts with cardio-CT in a cardiology practice. Herz 28:126-135 10.1007/s00059-003-2464-1
9. Marano R, Storto ML, Maddestra N, Bonomo L (2004) Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft with retrospectively ECG-gated four-row multi-detector spiral computed tomography. Eur Radiol 14:1353-1362
10. Cademartiri F, Mollet N, van der Lugt A et al (2004) Non-invasive 16-row multislice CT coronary angiography: Usefulness of saline chaser. Eur Radiol 14:178-183 10.1007/s00330-003-2188-x
11. Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Becker C et al (2000) Cardiac imaging with rapid, retrospective ECG synchronized multilevel spiral CT. Radiologe 40:111-117 10.1007/s001170050018
12. Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Becker C et al (2000) Cardiac imaging by means of electrocardiographically gated multisection spiral CT: Initial experience. Radiology 217:564-571 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3crhtFChsg%3D%3D
13. Flohr T, Ohnesorge B (2001) Heart rate adaptive optimization of spatial and temporal resolution for electrocardiogram-gated multislice spiral CT of the heart. J Comput Assist Tomogr 25:907-923 10.1097/00004728-200111000-00014
14. Luisada AA, MacCanon DM (1972) The phases of the cardiac cycle. Am Heart J 83:705-711 10.1016/0002-8703(72)90412-7
15. Herzog C, Dogan S, Diebold T et al (2003) Multi-detector row CT versus coronary angiography: Preoperative evaluation before totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. Radiology 229:200-208 14519876
16. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Holle J, Muschiol G, Daniel WG, Moshage W (2000) In-plane coronary arterial motion velocity: Measurement with electron-beam CT. Radiology 216:457-463 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvgslSquw%3D%3D
17. Hong C, Becker CR, Huber A et al (2001) ECG-gated reconstructed multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: Effect of varying trigger delay on image quality. Radiology 220:712-717 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mvotlagsg%3D%3D
18. Kopp AF, Ohnesorge B, Flohr T et al (2000) Cardiac multidetector-row CT: first clinical results of retrospectively ECG-gated spiral with optimized temporal and spatial resolution. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 172:429-435 10.1055/s-2000-673
19. Georg C, Kopp A, Schroder S et al (2001) Optimizing image reconstruction timing for the RR interval in imaging coronary arteries with multi-slice computerized tomography. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 173:536-541 10.1055/s-2001-14983
20. Rodenwaldt J (2003) Multislice computed tomography of the coronary arteries. Eur Radiol 13:748-757 12664113
21. Nikolaou K, Sagmeister S, Knez A et al (2003) Multidetector-row computed tomography of the coronary arteries: Predictive value and quantitative assessment of non-calcified vessel-wall changes. Eur Radiol 13:2505-2512 10.1007/s00330-003-2053-y
22. Lu B, Dai RP, Zhuang N, Budoff MJ (2002) Noninvasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft patency and flow characteristics by electron-beam tomography. J Invasive Cardiol 14:19-24 11773691
23. Pasowicz M, Klimeczek P, Pieniazek P et al (2002) Assessment of stent patency using multi-slice spiral computed tomography: Initial experience. Acta Cardiol 57:63-64 11918156
24. Nieman K, Pattynama PM, Rensing BJ, Van Geuns RJ, De Feyter PJ (2003) Evaluation of patients after coronary artery bypass surgery: CT angiographic assessment of grafts and coronary arteries. Radiology 229:749-756 14657312
25. Enzweiler CN, Kivelitz DE, Wiese TH et al (2000) Coronary artery bypass grafts: Improved electron-beam tomography by prolonging breath holds with preoxygenation. Radiology 217:278-283 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvmsVGgtg%3D%3D
26. Knollmann FD, Moller J, Gebert A, Bethge C, Felix R (2004) Assessment of coronary artery stent patency by electron-beam CT. Eur Radiol 14:1341-1347 10.1007/s00330-004-2337-x
27. Achenbach S, Moshage W, Ropers D, Nossen J, Bachmann K (1997) Noninvasive, three-dimensional visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts by electron beam tomography. Am J Cardiol 79:856-861 10.1016/S0002-9149(97)00003-9
28. Ropers D, Ulzheimer S, Wenkel E et al (2001) Investigation of aortocoronary artery bypass grafts by multislice spiral computed tomography with electrocardiographic-gated image reconstruction. Am J Cardiol 88:792-795 10.1016/S0002-9149(01)01855-0
29. Dewey M, Lembcke A, Enzweiler C, Hamm B, Rogalla P (2004) Isotropic half-millimeter angiography of coronary artery bypass grafts with 16-slice computed tomography. Ann Thorac Surg 77:800-804 10.1016/S0003-4975(03)01591-1