Assessment of promixal anastomosis of aortocoronary bypass grafts utilizing ECG-triggered single-slice computed tomography;Proximale anastomosen aortokoronarer bypasse: Beurteilung mittels EKG- getriggerter einzeilencomputertomographie

Radiologe

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 130-135

  Von Smekal, A ^a   Lachat, M ^b   Wildermuth, S ^b   Khan, G ^b   Turina, M ^b   Marincek, B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b NONE

Author keywords

CABG patency; Coronary artery bypass graft; Coronary vessels; ECG triggered CT; Heart

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; GRAFT PATENCY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; VALIDATION PROCESS; ANASTOMOSIS; DIASTOLE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GRAFT OCCLUSION; HEART RATE; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTOLE;

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; DIASTOLE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GRAFT OCCLUSION, VASCULAR; HEART RATE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTOLE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0033624840     PISSN: 0033832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s001170050021     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Baner HB, Standeven JW, Reese J (1985) Twelve year experience with internal mammary artery for coronary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 90:668-675
2. Bateman TM, Gray RJ, Whiting JS, Matloff JM, Berman DS, Forrester JS (1986) Cine computed tomography evaluation of aortocoronary bypass graft patency. J Am Coll Cardiol 8:693-698
3. Bateman TM, Gray RJ, Whiting JS, Sethna DH, Berman DS, Matloff JM, Swan HJ (1987) Prospective evaluation of ultrafast cardiac computed tomography for determination of coronary bypass graft patency. Circulation 75:1018-1024
4. Boyd DR, Lipton MJ (1983) Cardiac computed tomography. Proc IEEE 71:298-307
5. Brundage BH, Lipton MJ, Herfkens RJ, Berninger WH, Redington RW, Chatterjee K, Carlsson E (1980) Detection of patent coronary bypass grafts by computed tomography. A preliminary report. Circulation 61:826-831
6. Daniel WG, Döhring W, Stender HS, Lichtlen PR (1983) Value and limitation of computed tomography in assessing aortocoronary bypass graft patency. Circulation 67:983-987
7. Engelmann MG, Smekal A von, Knez A, Kürzinger E, Huehns TY, Höfling B, Reiser M (1997) Accuracy of spiral computed tomography for identifying arterial and venous coronary graft patency. Am J Cardiol 80:569-574
8. Fitzgibbon GM, Kafka HP, Leach AJ, Keon WJ, Hooper GD, Burton JR (1996) Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: angiographic follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years. J Am Coll Cardiol 28:616-626
9. Godwin JD, Califf RM, Korobkin M, Moore AV, Breiman RS, Kong Y (1983) Clinical value of coronary bypass evaluation with CT. Am J Radiol 140:649-655
10. Ha JW, Cho SY, Shim WH, Chung N, Jang Y, Lee HM, Choe KO, Chung WJ, Choi SH, Yoo KJ, Kang MS (1999) Noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency using three-dimensional angiography obtained with contrast enhanced electron-beam CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:1055-1059
11. Harell GS, Guthaner DF, Breimann RS, Mourehouse ChC, Seppi EJ, Marshall WH, Wexler L (1977) Stop-action cardiac computed tomography. Radiology 123:515-517
12. Heuser Ł, Lackner K, Hauser H (1982) Validität der Computertomographie bei der Darstellung offener und verschlossener aortokoronarer Venenbrücken (ACVB). Rofo Fortschr Geb Roentgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 137:619-626
13. Hlatky MA, Rogers WJ, Johnstone I, Boothroyd D, Brooks MM, Pitt B, Reeder G, Ryan T, Smith H, Whitlow P, Wiens R, Mark DB (1997) Medical care costs and quality of life after randomization to coronary angioplasty or coronary bypass surgery. Bypass Angiography Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators. N Engl J Med 336:92-99
14. Kalender WA, Seissler W, Klotz E, Vock P (1990) Spiral volumetric CT with single-breath-hold technique, continous transport, and continuous scanner rotation. Radiology 176:181-813
15. Kent KM, Borer JS, Green MV (1978) Effects of coronary-artery bypass on global and regional left ventricular function during exercise. N Engl J Med 298:1434-1436
16. Lackner K, Thun P (1980) EKG-gesteuerte Kardiocomputertomographie. Rofo Fortschr Geb Roentgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 132:164-169
17. Lackner K, Simon H, Thun P (1979) Kardio-Computertomographie - neue Möglichkeiten in der radiologischen nichtinvasiven Herzdiagnostik. Z Kardiol 68:667-675
18. Lipton MJ, Takaro T, Clayman J, Maley T (1986) Factors associated with long-term graft patency after coronary bypass surgery. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 28:301-308
19. Lytle BW, Loop FD, Cosgrove DM (1985) Long term patency (5 to 12 years) serial studies of internal mammary artery and saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 89:248-259
20. McKay CR, Brundage BH, Ullyot DJ, Turley K, Lipton MJ, Ebert PA (1983) Evaluation of early postoperative coronary artery bypass graft patency by contrast enhanced computed tomography. JACC 2:312-317
21. Mühlberger V, Knapp E, Nedden D zu, Braunsteiner H (1985) Vergleich zwischen angiographisch und computertomographisch dargestellten aortokoronaren Venenbrücken bei 100 Patienten. Rofo Fortschr Geb Roentgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 142:406-410
22. Rumberger JA, Feiring AJ, Hiratzka LE, Reiter SJ, Stanford W, Marcus ML (1986) Determination of changes in coronary bypass graft flow rate using cine-CT (abstract). J Am Coll Cardiol 7:155A
23. v. Smekal A, Knez A, Seelos KC, Haberl R, Spiegl F, Reichart B, Steinbeck G, Reiser M (1997) Vergleich von ultraschneller Computertomographie, Magnetresonanz-angiographie und selektiver Angiographie zum Nachweis der Durchgängigkeit koronarer Bypässe. Rofo Fortschr Geb Roentgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 166:185-191
24. Stanford W, Brundage BH, MacMillan R, Chomka EV, Bateman TM, Eldredge WJ, Lipton MJ, White CW, Wilson RF, Johnson MR (1988) Sensitivity and specifity of assessing coronary bypass graft patency with ultrafast computed tomography: results of a multi-center study. J Am Coll Cardiol 12:1-7
25. Stanford W, Rooholamini SH, Rumberger J, Marcus M (1988) Evaluation of coronary bypass graft patency by ultrafast computed tomography. J Thorac Imaging 3:52-55
26. Steiner P, Phillips F, Stiel G, Schuchert A, Rust C, Hauger B, Buecheler E (1994) Validität der Spiral-Computertomographie bei der Darstellung aortokoronarer Bypass-Gefäße. Rofo Fortschr Geb Roentgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 160:23-29
27. Tello R, Costello P, Ecker C, Hartnell G (1993) Spiral CT evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency. J Comput Assist Tomogr 17:253-259
28. Van der Meer J, Hillege HL, Koostra GJ, Ascoop CA, Mulder BJ, Pfisterer M, Gilst WH van, Lie Kl (1993) Prevention of one-year vein graft occlusion after aortocoronary-bypass surgery: a comparison of low-dose aspirin, low-dose aspirin plus dipyridamole, and oral anticoagulants. Lancet 342:257-264
29. Wicke K, Mühlberger V, Judmaier W, Moes N, Nedden D zur (1991) Die Wertigkeit von CT und MRT bei der Erfassung von aortokoronaren Venenbrücken im Vergleich zur Koronarangiographie. Rofo Fortschr Geb Roentgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 154:306-309