Stereotactic breast biopsy of noncalcified lesions: A cost-minimization analysis comparing 14-gauge multipass automated core biopsy to 14- and 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy

Clinical Imaging

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 26-33

  Soo, Mary Scott ^a   Kliewer, Mark A ^b   Ghate, Sujata ^a   Helsper, Richard S ^c   Rosen, Eric L ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c Clarian Health Methodist IU Riley   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast biopsy; Cost analysis; Diagnosis

Indexed keywords

CALCIFICATION (BIOCHEMISTRY); COSTS; DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL IMAGING; PROBABILITY;

COST VARIABLES; NONCALCIFIED LESIONS; STEREOTACTIC BREAST BIOPSY;

BIOPSY;

ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST MINIMIZATION ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

BIOPSY; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; VACUUM;

EID: 11844251234     PISSN: 08997071     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2004.03.007     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE, Luethke JM, Hopper KD, Yakes WF, Burke BJ Stereotactic breast biopsy wit a biopsy gun. Radiology. 176:1990;741-747
2. Burbank F Stereotactic breast biopsy of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ lesions: improved accuracy with directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology. 202:1997;843-884
3. Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH, Evans WP, Lechner MC, Richardson TR, Tocino I, Wray AB Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotactic breast biopsy: improved reliability with 14-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology. 204:1997;485-488
4. Parker SH, Englewood CO, Dennis MA, Jobe WE, Hendrick RE Clinical efficacy of digital stereotaxic mammography. Radiology. 189(P):1993;326
5. Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ, Aucreman CJ, Cardenosa G, Cink TM, Coscia JL, Eklund GW, Evans WP, Garver PR Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology. 193:1994;359-364
6. Parker SH, Burbank F State of the art: a practical approach to minimally invasive breast biopsy. Radiology. 200:1996;11-20
7. Liberman L, Fahs MC, Dershaw DD, Bonaccio E, Abramson AF, Cohen MA, Hann LE Impact of stereotaxic core breast biopsy on cost of diagnosis. Radiology. 195:1995;633-637
8. Liberman L, Cohen MA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Hann LE, Rosen PP Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotaxic core biopsy of breast lesions: an indication for surgical biopsy. AJR. 164:1995;1111-1113
9. Soo MS, Ghate S, DeLong D Stereotactic biopsy of non-calcified breast lesions: utility of vacuum-assisted technique compared to multipass automated gun technique. Clin Imaging. 23:1999;347-352
10. Philpotts LE, Hooley RJ, Lee CH Comparison of automated versus vacuum-assisted biopsy methods for sonography guided core biopsy of the breast. AJR. 180:2003;347-351
11. Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH, Evans WP, Lechner MC, Richardson TR, Smid AA, Borofsky HB, Lee CH, Goldstein HM, Schilling KJ, Wray AB, Brem RF, Helbich TH, Lehrer DE, Adler SJ Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: determinants of ductal carcinoma in-situ underestimation rates. Radiology. 218:2001;497-502
12. Liberman L, Sama MP Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR. 175:2000;53-58
13. Brem RF, Schoonjans JM, Goodman SN, Nolten A, Askin FB, Gatewood OMB Nonpalpable breast cancer: percutaneous diagnosis with 11- and 8-gauge stereotactic vacuum assisted biopsy devices. Radiology. 219:2001;793-796
14. Greater mammography usage and payment rates put breast care centers at risk. ACR Bull. 57:2001;34-35
15. Meyer JE, Smith DN, Lester SC, DiPiro PJ, Denison CM, Harvey SC, Christian RL, Richardson A, Ko WD Large-needle core biopsy: nonmalignant breast abnormalities evaluated with surgical excision or repeat core biopsy. Radiology. 206:1998;717-720
16. Jackman RJ, Nowels NW, Rodriquez-Soto J, Marzoni FA, Finkelstein SI, Shepard MJ Stereotactic automated large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology. 210:1999;799-805
17. Kliewer MA, Sheafor DH, Paulson EK, Helsper RS, Hertzberg BS, Nelson RC Percutaneous liver biopsy: a cost-benefit analysis comparing sonographic and CT guidance. AJR. 173(5):1999;1199-1202
18. Singer ME, Applegate KE Cost-effectiveness analysis in radiology. Radiology. 219:2001;611-620
19. Helsper RS, Cessari JG Developing radiology procedure cost standards. Radiol Manage. 19:1997;41-48
20. Hrung JM, Langlotz CP, Orel SG, Fox KR, Schnall MD, Schwartz JS Cost-effectiveness of MR imaging and core-needle biopsy in the preoperative work-up of suspicious breast lesions. Radiology. 213:1999;39-49
21. Lee CH, Egglin TK, Philpotts L, Mainiero MB, Tocino I Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic core needle biopsy: analysis by means of mammographic findings. Radiology. 202:1997;849-854