Retraction: Tracing Knowledge Flows in Innovation Systems—an Informetric Perspective on Future Research Science-based Innovation (Economic Systems research, (2002), 14, 4, (323–344), 10.1080/0953531022000024824);Tracing knowledge flows in innovation systems - an informetric perspective on future research on science-based innovation

Economic Systems Research

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 323-344

  Meyer, Martin ^a  

^a SYO   (Finland)

Author keywords

Patents; Publications; Science; Technology

Indexed keywords

INNOVATION; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

FINLAND;

EID: 0036907053     PISSN: 09535314     EISSN: 14695758     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09535314.2020.1804704     Document Type: Erratum

References (56)

1. Archibugi, D. & Pianta, M. (1996) Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys, Technovation, 16, pp. 451-468.
2. Arundel, A., Van de Paal, G. & Soete, L. (1995) PACE report; innovation strategies of Europe's largest industrial firms, report prepared for the SPRINT programme, DG XIII of the European Commission (Maastricht, MERIT).
3. Arundel, A., Smith, K., Patel, P. & Sirilli, G. (1998) The future of innovation measurement in Europe- concepts, problems and practical directions, IDEA-report 3/1998 (Oslo, STEP Group).
4. Brooks, H. (1994) The relationship between science and technology, Research Policy, 23, pp. 477-486.
5. Carpenter, M. P. & Narin, F. (1983) Validation study: patent citations as indicators of science and foreign dependence, World Patent Information, 5, pp. 180-185.
6. Coward, H. R. & Franklin, J. J. (1989) Identifying the science-technology interface: matching patent data to a bibliometric model, Science, Technology and Human Values, 14, pp. 50-77.
7. DeCarolis, D. M. & Leeds, D. L. (1999) The impact of stock and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: an empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry, Strategic Management Journal, 20, pp. 953-968.
8. Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. (2000) The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and 'Mode 2' to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations, Research Policy, 29, pp. 109-123.
9. Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A. & Healey, P. (eds) (1998) Capitalizing Knowledge: New Intersections of Industry and Academia (Albany, NY, SUNY Press).
10. Geisler, E. (2000) The Metrics of Science and Technology (Westport CT and London, Quorum).
11. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scot, P. & Trow, M. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge (London, Sage).
12. Godin, B. (1995) Research and the practice of publication in industries, Research Policy, 25, pp. 587-606.
13. Granberg, A. (1996) On the pursuit of systematic technology policies in an unstable environment: reflections on a Swedish case, Research Evaluation, 6, pp. 143-157.
14. Grupp, H. & Schmoch, U. (1992) Perceptions of scientification of innovation as measured by referencing between patents and papers: dynamics in science-based fields of technology, in: H. Grupp (ed) Dynamics of Science-based Innovation (Berlin, Springer Verlag), pp. 73-128.
15. Henderson, R., Jaffe, A. B. & Trajtenberg, M. (1998) Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988, Review of Economics and Statistics, 13, pp. 119-127.
16. Hicks, D. (1995) Published papers, tacit competencies and corporate management of the public/private character of knowledge, Industrial and Corporate Change, 4, pp. 401-424.
17. Hicks, D., Breitzman, T., Olivastro, D. & Hamilton, K. (2001) The changing composition of innovative activity in the US-a portrait based on patent analysis, Research Policy, 30, pp. 681-703.
18. Hicks, D. & Katz, S. (1996) Systematic bibliometric indicators for the knowledge-based economy, paper prepared for the Conference on New S&T Indicators for the Knowledge-Based Economy, OECD, Paris, 19-21 June.
19. Jaffe, A. B., Henderson, R. & Trajtenberg, M. (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, pp. 577-598.
20. Landry, R., Traore, N. & Godin, B. (1996) An econometric analysis of the effect of collaboration on academic research productivity, Higher Education, 32, pp. 283-301.
21. Lanjouw, J., Pakes, A. & Putnam, J. (1996) How to count patents and value intellectual property: uses of patent renewal and application data, NBER working paper 5741 (Cambridge MA, National Bureau of Economic Research).
22. Lundvall, B. A. (ed) (1992) National Innovation Systems: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning (London, Pinter).
23. Malerba, F. & Orsenigo, L. (2000) Reply to Rosenbloom's letter to the editor, Research Policy, 29, pp. 1187-1188.
24. Marsili, O. (1999) The anatomy and evolution of industries: technical change and industrial dynamics. PhD thesis (Brighton, University of Sussex).
25. Martin, B., Salter, A., Hicks, D., Pavitt, K., Senker, J., Sharp, M. & Von Tunzelmann, N. (1996) The Relationship Between Publicly Funded Basic Research and Economic Performance: a SPRU Review (London, HM Treasury).
26. Meyer, M. (2000a) Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature, Research Policy, 29, pp. 409-434
27. Meyer, M. (2000b) What is special about patent citations? Differences between scientific and patent citations, Scientometrics, 49, pp. 93-123.
28. Meyer, M. (2000c) Patent citation analysis as a policy planning tool. IPTS Report 49, (Sevilla, IPTS).
29. Meyer, M. (2001a) Patent citation analysis in a novel field of technology, Scientometrics, 51, pp. 163-183.
30. Meyer, M. (2001b) Between technology and science: exploring an emerging field-knowledge flows and networking on the nano-scale. PhD thesis (Brighton, University of Sussex).
31. Moed, H. F. (1996) Differences in the construction of SCI based bibliometric indicators among various producers: a first overview, Scientometrics, 35, pp. 177-191.
32. Napolitano, G. & Sirilli, G. (1990) The patent system and the exploitation of inventions: results of a statistical survey conducted in Italy, Technovation, 10, pp. 5-16.
33. Narin, F., Hamilton, K. S. & Olivastro, D. (1997) The increasing linkage between US technology and public science, Research Policy, 26, pp. 317-330.
34. Narin, F. & Noma, E. (1985) Is technology becoming science?, Scientometrics, 7, pp. 369-381.
35. Nelson, R. R. (ed) (1993) National Innovation Systems-a Comparative Analysis (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
36. Noyons, E., Van Raan, A. F. J., Grupp, H. & Schmoch, U. (1994) Exploring the science and technology interface: inventor-author relations in laser medicine research, Research Policy, 23, pp. 443-457.
37. OECD (1997) National Innovation Systems (Paris, OECD).
38. Patel, P. (1998) Indicators for systems of innovation and system interaction-technological collaboration and inter-active learning. IDEA-report 11/1998 (Oslo, STEP Group).
39. Pavitt, K. (1997) Do patents reflect the useful research output of universities?, Research Evaluation, 7, pp. 105-111.
40. Persson, O. (2000) Studying national innovation systems using papers and patents-methods and examples, Research note (Stockholm, NUTEK).
41. Persson, O., Luukkonen, T. & Hälikkä, S. (2000) A bibliometric study of Finnish science. Working paper 48, (Espoo, VTT Group for Technology Studies).
42. Porter, M. E. & Stern, S. (1999) The New Challenge to America's Prosperity: Findings from the Innovation Index (Washington DC, Council on Competitiveness).
43. Price, D. S. (1965) Is technology historically independent of science? A study in statistical historiography, Technology and Culture, 6, pp. 553-568.
44. Rogers, E. M. (1987) Progress, problems and prospects for network research: investigating relationships in the age of electronic communication technologies, Social Networks, 9, pp. 285-310.
45. Rosenbloom, R. S. (2000) Letter to the editor, Research Policy, 29, p. 1185.
46. Salter, A. J. & Martin, B. R. (2001) The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review, Research Policy, 30, pp. 509-532.
47. Scherer, F. M. (1999) New Perspectives on Economic Growth and Technological Innovation (Washington DC, Brookings Institution Press).
48. Schmoch, U. (1993) Tracing the knowledge transfer form science to technology as reflected in patent indicators, Scientometrics, 26, pp. 193-211.
49. Schmoch, U. (1997) Indicators and the relationships between science and technology, Scientometrics, 38, pp. 103-116.
50. Senker, J., Faulkner, W. & Velho, L. (1998) Science and technology knowledge flows between industrial and academic research: a comparative study, in: H. Etzkowitz, A. Webster & P. Healey (eds) Capitalizing Knowledge: New Intersections of Industry and Academia (Albany, NY, SUNY Press), pp. 111-132.
51. Sirilli, G. (1998) Conceptualising and measuring technological innovation. IDEA-Report 1/1998 (Oslo, STEP Group).
52. Smith, K., Ekeland, A., Iversen, E., Kaloudis, A., Patel, P. & Narula, R. (1998) Understanding science, technology and innovation indicators-a guide for policy-makers. IDEA-Report 5/1998 (Oslo, STEP Group).
53. Van Raan, A. F. J. (1997) Scientometrics: state-of-the-art, Scientometrics, 38, pp. 205-218.
54. Verbeek, A., Debackere, K., Luwel, M., Van Looy, B., Andries, P., Van Hulle, M. & Deleus, F. (2001) Linking science to technology-using bibliographic references in patents to build linkage schemes. Positioning Paper, R&D Division INCENTIM (Leuven, KU Leuven).
55. Wallmark, J., McQueen, D. & Sedig, K. (1988) Measurement of output from university research: a case study, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 35, pp. 175-180.
56. Ziman, J. (1994) Prometheus Bound: Science in a Dynamic Steady State (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).