Distributed interactive communication in simulated space-dwelling groups

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 311-340

  Brady, Joseph V ^a,b   Hienz, Robert D ^a,b   Hursh, Steven R ^a,b,c   Ragusa, Leonard C ^c   Rouse, Charles O ^b   Gasior, Eric D ^b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Institutes for Behavior Resources   (United States)

^c SAIC FREDERICK INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Communication; Distributed interactive simulation; Synthetic task environment

Indexed keywords

ATTENUATION; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMPUTER PROGRAM LISTINGS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; REMOTE CONSOLES; TEXT PROCESSING;

DISTRIBUTED INTERACTIVE SIMULATION; SPACE DWELLING GROUPS; SYNTHETIC TASK ENVIRONMENT;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; AEROSPACE MEDICINE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COOPERATION; COSMONAUT; FEMALE; GEOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MENTAL STRESS; MICROCLIMATE; MOTIVATION; NASA DISCIPLINE SPACE HUMAN FACTORS; NASA PROGRAM BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH AND COUNTERMEASURES; NON-NASA CENTER; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SOCIAL ISOLATION; SPACE FLIGHT;

NASA DISCIPLINE SPACE HUMAN FACTORS; NASA PROGRAM BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH AND COUNTERMEASURES; NON-NASA CENTER;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; AEROSPACE MEDICINE; ASTRONAUTS; COMMUNICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; EXTRATERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; GEOLOGY; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MOTIVATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; SOCIAL ISOLATION; SPACE SIMULATION; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

EID: 1142303884     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.022     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ancona D., Caldwell D. Demography and design. Predictors of new product team performance Organization Science. 3(3):1992;321-341.
2. Baker G. The effects of synchronous collaborative technologies in decision making. a study of Virtual Teams Information Resources Management Journal. 15(4):2002;79-93.
3. Bernstein D.J., Brady J.V. The utility of continuously programmed environments in the experimental analysis of human behavior. Reese H.W., Parrott J.J. Behavior science: philosophical, methodological, and empirical advances. 1986;Erlbaum, NJ.
4. Brady J.V. Toward applied behavior analysis of life aloft. Behavioral Science. 35(1):1990;11-23.
5. Brady J.V. Continuously programmed environments and the experimental analysis of human behavior. Progress in Behavioral Studies, Monograph No. 1. 1992;Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies, Cambridge, MA.
6. Costa P.T., McCrae R.R. Domains and facets. hierarchical personality assessment using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory Journal of Personality Assessment. 64:1995;21-50.
7. Costa P.T., McCrae R.R. Stability and change in personality assessment. the revised NEO Personality Inventory in the year 2000 Journal of Personality Assessment. 68:1997;86-94.
8. Costa P.T., Widiger T.A. Personality disorders and the Five-Factor model of personality. 1994;American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
9. Derogatis L.R., Melisaratos N. The brief symptom inventory. an introductory report Psychological Medicine. 13:1983;595-605.
10. Dougherty D. Interpretative barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science. 3(2):1992;179-202.
11. Duffy L. Team decision-making biases. an information-processing perspective Klein G.A., Orasanu J., Calderwood R., Zsambok C.E. Decision making in action: models and methods. 1993;346-359 Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ.
12. Ebadi Y., Utterback J. The effects of communication on technological innovation. Management Science. 30(5):1984;572-586.
13. Emurian, H. H., Brady, J. V., Meyerhoff, J. L., & Mougey, E. H. (1981). Behavioral and biological interactions with confined microsocieties in a programmed environment. In Space manufacturing. New York: Amer. Inst. Aeronautics and Astronautics.
14. Emurian H.H., Brady J.V., Ray R.L., Meyerhoff J.L., Mougey E.H. Experimental analysis of team performance. Naval Research Reviews, Office of Naval Research. 36:1984;3-19.
15. Fiore S.W., Cuevas H., Scielzo S., Salas E. Training individuals for distributed teams. problem solving assessment for distributed mission research Computers in Human Behavior. 18:2002;729-744.
16. Gillis, P., & Hursh, S. R. (1999). Using behavior moderators to influence CGF command entity effectiveness and performance. In Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Computer Generated Forces and Behavioral Representation, Orlando, FL.
17. Gottschalk L.A., Gleser G.C. The measurement of psychological states through the content analysis of verbal behavior. 2000;University of California Press, Los Angeles, Berkeley.
18. Guerin B. Analyzing social behavior: behavior analysis and the social sciences. 1994;Context Press, Reno, NV.
19. Hursh, S. R. (1997). Modeling the effects of general stress and fatigue on performance of a simulated command entity. Final Report to the Army Research Institute.
20. Hursh, S. R. (1998) Modeling sleep and performance within the integrated unit simulation system (IUSS). Final Report for the Directorate of Science and Technology, Natick Research, Development, and Engineering Center.
21. Hursh, S. R., Brady, J. V., & Hienz, R. D. (2003). Psychosocial performance factors in space dwelling groups. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation. Scottsdale, Arizona. (ISBN 1-930638-30-2).
22. Hursh S.R., McNally R. Modeling human performance to predict unit effectiveness. Kamely D., Bannister K., Sasmor R. Army science: the new frontiers, military and civilian applications, Saratoga. 1993;309-328 Borg Biomedical Books, WY.
23. Kelly T.H., Foltin R.W., Emurian C.E., Fischman M.W. Performance-based testing of drugs of abuse. dose and time profiles of marijuana, amphetamine, alcohol, and diazepam Journal of Analytical Toxicology. 17:1993;264-272.
24. Kelly T.H., Taylor R.C., Heishman S.J., Crouch D.J. Performance measures of behavioral impairment in applied settings. Karch S.B. Handbook of drug abuse. 1998;235-265 CRC Press, Boca Raton.
25. Kraemer K., King J. Computer-based systems for cooperative work and group decision making. ACM Computing Surveys. 20(2):1988;115-146.
26. Orvis K., Wisher R., Bonk C., Olson T. Communication patterns during synchronous Web-page military training in problem solving. Computers in Human Behavior. 18:2002;783-795.
27. Pinsonneault A., Kraemer K.L. The effects of electronic meetings on group process and outcomes. an assessment of the empirical research European Journal of Operations Research. 46:1990;143-161.
28. Pinto M., Pinto J., Prescott J. Antecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional cooperation. Management Science. 39(10):1993;1281-1297.
29. Pratt D.R., Pratt S.M., Waldrop M.S., Barham P.T., Ehlert J.F., Chrislip C.A. Humans in large-scale, real-time, networked virtual environments. Presence. 6(5):1997;547-564.
30. Sarker S., Valacich J., Sarker S. Virtual team trust. Instrument development and validation in an IS educational environment Information Resources Management Journal. 16(2):2003;35-55.