ESDP as a transatlantic issue: Problems of mutual ambiguity

International Studies Review

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 381-402

  Peters, Ingo ^a  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GEOPOLITICS; MILITARY INTERVENTION; POLICY MAKING; SECURITY THREAT;

EID: 11244309358     PISSN: 15219488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1521-9488.2004.00422.x     Document Type: Review

References (117)

1. Adler, Emanuel, and Michael Barnett. (1998) Studying Security Communities in Theory, Comparison, and History. In Security Communities, edited by Emanuel Adler and Michael Barnett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Albright, Madeleine. (1998a) The Right Balance Will Secure NATO's Future. Financial Times, December 7:12.
3. Albright, Madeleine. (1998b) Statement to the North Atlantic Council: December 8. Washington, DC: United States Department of State. Available at http://secretary.state.gov/www/statements/1998/981208.html. (Accessed February 28, 2004)
4. Amsterdam Treaty on European Union. (1997) Available at http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/treaties/dat/amsterdam.html#0145010077. (Accessed March 3, 2002)
5. Asmus, Ronald D., Rafael L. Bardaji, Christoph Bertram, and Carl Bildt. (2003) Declaration on Transatlantic Relations: How to Overcome the Divisions. Available at http://www.brookings.edu/views/papers/daalder/20030516.htm. (Accessed March 5, 2004)
6. Auswärtiges, Amt, ed. (1992) Europäische Politische Zusammenarbeit (EPZ) auf dem Weg zu einer Gemeinsamen Auβen- und Sicherheitspolitik (GASP). Bonn: Referat Öffentlichkeitsarbeit.
7. Bailes, Alyson J. K. (1999) NATO's European Pillar: The European Security and Defense Identity. Defense Analysis 15(3):305-322.
8. Bergsten, Fred C. (1999) America and Europe: Clash of the Titans? Foreign Affairs 78(2):20-34.
9. Blair, Tony. (2000) A Superpower, But Not a Superstate. The Guardian October 7. Available at http://www.guardian.co.uk/eurocommission/Story/0,2763,378819,00.html. (Accessed March 3, 2004)
10. Bolton, John R. (1999) Statement before the Committee on International Relations Hearing on "European Common Foreign, Security, and Defense Policies-Implications for the United States and the Atlantic Alliance." Washington, DC: United States House of Representatives, November 10. Available at http://www.aei.org/include/ news_print.asp?newsID=17123
11. Buchan, David. (1993) Europe: The Strange Superpower. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
12. Buerkle, Tom. (1999) NATO's New Chief Hones a Balancing Act. International Herald Tribune, October 14.
13. Bull, Hedley. (1983) European Self-Reliance and the Reform of NATO. Foreign Affairs 61(4): 874-892.
14. Bundy, McGeorge, George F. Kennan, Robert S. McNamara, and Gerard Smith. (1982) Nuclear Weapons and the Atlantic Alliance. Foreign Affairs 60(4):753-768.
15. Bush, George W. (2001) Excerpted Remarks to the North Atlantic Council. Brussels, June 13. Available at http://www.nato.int/docu/speech/2001/g010613g.htm. (Accessed February 28, 2004)
16. Cahen, Alfred. (1989) The Western European Union and NATO: Building a European Defence Identity within the Context of Atlantic Solidarity. London: Brassey's.
17. Cohen, Elliot A. (1982) The Long-Term Crisis of the Alliance. Foreign Affairs 61(2):325-343.
18. Daalder, Ivo H. (1987) The SDI Challenge to Europe. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
19. Daalder, Ivo H. (2003) The End of Atlanticism. Survival 45(2):147-166.
20. Daase, Christopher. (2002) Internationale Risikopolitik: Ein Forschungsprogramm für den sicherheitspolitischen Paradigmenwechsel. In Internationale Risikopolitik: Der Umgang mit neuen Gefahren in den internationalen Beziehungen, edited by Ingo Peters. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
21. Declaration of the Heads of State and Government. (1988) Meeting of the North Atlantic Council, March 2-3. Available at http://www.nato.int/docu/comni/49-95/c880303a.htm. (Accessed February 21, 2004)
22. Deutsch, Karl W. (1971) Analyse internationaler Beziehungen: Konzeptionen und Probleme der Friedensforschung. Frankfurt am Main.
23. Duke, Simon. (1994) Germanizing Europe: Europeanizing Germany? Security Dialogue 25:425-436.
24. Edwards, Geoffrey. (1997) The Potential and Limits of the CFSP: The Yugoslav Example. In Foreign Policy of the European Union: From EPC to CFSP and Beyond, edited by Elfriede Regelsberger. Boulder: Westview.
25. Estrella, Rafael. (1996) CJTF and the Reform of NATO. Brussels: North Atlantic Assembly Defence and Security Committee General Report, AN 230 DSC (96) 8.
26. EU Council. (1999) Declaration of the European Council on Strengthening the Common European Policy on Security and Defence. Cologne, June 3-4.
27. Feld, Werner. (1987) The United States and Western Europe: Converging and Diverging Views on Defense Issues. In Europe in NATO: Deterrence, Defense, and Arm Control, edited by Carol Edler Baumann. New Yorkv: Praeger.
28. Feldmeier, Karl. (1999) Bei den Amerikanern wachst der Verdruβ am Bündnis. Frankfurter All-gemeine Zeitung. February 7.
29. Gegout, Catherine. (2002) The Quint: Acknowledging the Existence of a Big-Four Directoire at the Heart of the European Union's Foreign Policy Decision-Making Process. Journal of Common Market Studies 40:331-344.
30. Gherghisan, Mihaela. (2003) European Defence Agreement Reached. EU Observer. December 12. Available at http://euobs.com/?aid=13877& rk=l. (Accessed March 3, 2004)
31. Golden, James R. (1989) Burden-Bearing and Burden-Sharing. In Defense and Deétente: U.S. and West German Perspectives on Defense Policy, edited by Klaus von Schubert. Boulder: Westview.
32. Greenwood, David. (1981) NATO's Three Per Cent Solution. Survival 23(6):252-260.
33. Haftendorn, Helga. (1983) Die Zukunft der amerikanischen militäirischen Präsenz in Europa. Europa Archiv 20.
34. Haftendorn, Helga. (1988) Eine schwiefige Partnerschaft: Bundesrepublik Deutschland und USA im Attantischen Bündnis. Berlin: Quorum.
35. Haftendorn, Helga. (1989) Auβenpolitische Prioritäten und Handlungsspielraum: Ein Paradigma zur Analyse der Auβenpolitik der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 30(1):32-49.
36. Haftendorn, Helga. (1999a) German Foreign Policy in a Strategic Triangle: Bonn-Paris-Washington. German Politics and Society 17(1):1-30.
37. Haftendorn, Helga. (1999b) The "Quad": Dynamics of Institutional Change. In Imperfect Unions: Security Institutions over Time and Space, edited by Robert O. Keohane. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38. Haftendorn, Helga. (2003) A Poisoned Relationship? Die transatlantischen Beziehungen nach den Terrorangriffen des 11 September 2001. In Weltmacht vor neuer Bedrohung: Die Bush-Administration und die US-Auβenpolitik nach dem Angriff auf Amerika, edited by Jü rgen Wilzewski. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
39. Haglund, David G. (1991) Alliance within the Alliance? Franco-German Military Cooperation and the European Pillar of Defense. Boulder: Westview.
40. Haine, Jean-Yves, ed. (2003) From Laeken to Copenhagen: European Defence Core Documents. Chaillot Paper 57. Paris: Institute for Security Studies.
41. Hamilton, Daniel. (2002) American Views of European Security and Defense Policy. In The EU's Search for a Strategic Role, edited by Esther Brimmer. Washington, DC: Center for Transatlantic Relations.
42. Hampson, Fen Osler. (1986) Is There an Alternative to NATO? In Securing Europe's Future: Changing Elements of European Security, edited by Fen Osler Hampson. London: Croom Helm.
43. Hoffmann, Stanley. (2001) The European Union and the New American Foreign Policy, Middlebury, VT: Middlebury College Working Papers Series.
44. Honicke, Michaela. (2002) Absichten und Ambivalenzen in der amerikanischen Auβenpolitik. In Europa und die USA: Transatlantische Beziehungen im Spannungsfeld van Regionalisierung und Globalisierung, edited by Susanne Luther. München: Olzog Verlag.
45. Howard, Michael, François de Rose, and Karl Kaiser. (1988) Battleground Europe. The Times (London), February 10.
46. Howorth, Jolyon. (2000a) Britain, France, and the European Defence Initiative. Survival 42(2): 33-55.
47. Howorth, Jolyon. (2000b) European Integration and Defence: The Ultimate Challenge. Chaillot Papers. Paris: Institute for Security Studies.
48. Howorth, Jolyon. (2001) European Defence and the Changing Politics of the EU: Hanging Together or Hanging Separately? Journal of Common Market Studies 39(4):765-790.
49. Hunter, Robert E. (1996) Press Briefing by American Ambassador at NATO Headquarters. Brussels, June 13. Available at http://www.nato.int/docu/speech/1996/s960613d.htm. (Accessed February 25, 2003)
50. Ikenberry, G. John. (2002) America's Imperial Ambition. Foreign Affairs 81(5):44-60.
51. Kagan, Robert. (2002) Power and Weakness. Policy Review 113:3-28.
52. Kaiser, Karl, Georg Leber, Alois Mertes, and Franz-Joseph Schulze. (1982) Nuclear Weapons and the Preservation of Peace. Foreign Affairs 60(5):1157-1170.
53. Kelleher, Catherine McArdle. (1995) The Future of European Security: An Interim Assessment. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Occasional Papers.
54. Kintis, Andreas G. (1999) Between Ambition and Paralysis: The European Union's CFSP and the War in Former Yugoslavia. In Redefining European Security, edited by Carl C. Hodge. New York: Garlad.
55. Krauthammer, Charles. (1991) The Unipolar Moment. Foreign Affairs 70(1):23-33.
56. Kristol, Irving. (1983) What's Wrong With NATO? New York Times Magazine, September 25:64-71.
57. Kupchan, Charles A. (2000) In Defence of European Defence: An American Perspective. Survival 42(2):16-32.
58. Lindley-French, Julian. (2002) Terms of Engagement. The Paradox of American Power and the Transatlantic Dilemma Post-11 September. Chaillot Papers. Paris: Institute for Security Studies.
59. McGeehan, Robert. (1987) Prospects for an Integrated European Defense. In Europe in NATO: Deterrence, Defense, and Arm Control, edited by Carol Edler Baumann. New York: Praeger.
60. Menon, Anand. (1993) From Independence to Co-operation: France, NATO, and European Security. International Affairs 71(1):19-34.
61. Menon, Anand, Anthony Foster, and William Wallace. (1992) A Common European Defence? Survival 34(3):98-118.
62. Monaco Annalisa. (2003) Operation Concordia and Berlin Plus: NATO and the EU Take Stock. NATO Notes (International Security Information Service, Europe) 5(8):9-11.
63. Müller, Harald, and Thomas Risse-Kappen. (1987) Origins of Estrangement: The Peace Movement and the Changed image of America in West Germany. International Security 12(1):52-88.
64. NATO Council Meeting. (1996) Final Communique. Berlin, June 13. Press Communique M-NAC1(96)63. Available at http://www.nato-int/docu/pr/1996/p96-063e.htm. (Accessed February 28, 2004)
65. NATO Ministerial Meeting of the North Atlantic Council. (1994) Declaration of the Heads of State and Government. Brussels, January 11. Available at http://www.nato.int/docu/comm/49-95/c940111a.htm. (Accessed February 28, 2004)
66. Nelson, Daniel N. (2002) Transatlantic Transmutations. The Washington Quarterly 25(4):51-66.
67. Nutall, Simon J. (1985) European Political Cooperation and the Single European Act. In Yearbook of European Law, edited by F. G. Jacobs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
68. Nutall, Simon J. (1992) European Political Co-operation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
69. Nutall, Simon J. (1997) Two Decades of EPC Performance. In Foreign Policy of the European Union: From EPC to CFSP and Beyond, edited by Wolfgang Wessels. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
70. Nye, Joseph S., Jr. (1990) Bound to Lead-The Changing of American Power. New York: Basic Books.
71. Oldag, Andreas. (2000) EU vermeidet Konfrontation mit der Nato. Sueddeutsche Zeitung, December 10.
72. Palmer, Diego A. Ruiz. (1992) The Future of West European Security and Defence Cooperation: A United States Perspective. In In the Midst of Change: On the Development of West European Security and Defence Cooperation, edited by Peter Schmidt. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
73. Penska, Susan E., and Warren L. Mason. (2003) EU Security Cooperation and the Transatlantic Relationship. Cooperation and Conflict 38(3):255-280.
74. Peters, Ingo. (1999) The OSCE and German Foreign Policy: A Study in How Institutions Matter. In Imperfect Unions: Security Institutions over Space and Time, edited by Helga Haftendorn, Robert O. Keohane, and Celeste A. Wallander. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
75. Peterson, John. (1996) Security Cooperation with the United States: Establishing a True Transatlantic Partnership. In Managing Security in Europe: The European Union and the Challenge of Enlargement, edited by Dirk Rumberg. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Foundation Publishers.
76. Prague Summit Declaration. (2002) Statement Issued by Heads of State and Government. Prague, NATO Council Meeting, November 21. Available at http://www.nato.int/docu/pr/2002/p02127e.htm. (Accessed March 3, 2004)
77. Quille, Gerrard. (2003) What Does the EU Agreement on Operational Planning Mean for NATO? NATO Notes (International Security Information Service, Europe) 5(8):6-9.
78. Redman, Charles. (1988) Militarpakt stosst auf Skepsis. Frankfurter Rundschau, January 25.
79. Risse, Thomas. (2003) Beyond Iraq: The Crisis of the Transatlantic Security Community. Die Friedenswarte 78(2-3):173-194.
80. Risse-Kappen, Thomas. (1995) Cooperation among Democracies: The European Influence on U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
81. Rodman, Peter. (1999) Statement before the Committee on International Relations Hearing on "European Common Foreign, Security, and Defense Policies-Implications for the United States and the Atlantic Alliance." Washington, DC: United States House of Representatives, November 10.
82. Rühl, Lothar. (1979) Die Nichtentscheidung über die Neutronenwaffe: Ein Beispiel verfehlter Bündnispolitik. Europa Archiv 34(5):137-150.
83. Rühl, Lothar. (1988) Eine solche Strategie hätte fatale Konsequenzen für die Sicherheit Westeuropas. Die Welt, January 19:5.
84. Rumsfeld, Donald. (2003) Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld Briefs at the Foreign Press Center, January 22. Available at http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jan2003/i01232003-t0122sdfpc.html. (Accessed January 7, 2004)
85. Rutten, Maartje, ed. (2001) From St. Mato to Nice: European Defence Core Documents. Chaillot Paper 47. Chaillot Papers. Paris: Institute for Security Studies.
86. Saceur Agreement. (1993) January 21. Available at http://www.eurocorps.org/site/index.php? landuage= en&content= history. (Accessed February 25, 2004)
87. Salmon, Trevor C. (1985) A European Defence Identity. EIS (European Institute for Security) Journal 1:6-20.
88. Schlesinger, James R. (1984) An American Perspective. In NATO-The Next Generation, edited by Robert E. Hunter. Boulder: Westview.
89. Schmidt, Helmut. (1984) Leadership in the Alliance. In NATO-The Next Generation, edited by Robert E. Hunter. Boulder: Westview.
90. Schmidt, Peter. (1985) Europeanization of Defense: Prospects of Consensus. EIS (European Institute for Security) Journal 6:2-31.
91. Schoutheete de Tervarent, Philippe. (1997) The Creation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy. In Foreign Policy of the European Union: From EPC to CFSP and Beyond, edited by Elfriede Regelsberger, Pierre de Schoutheete de Tervarent, and Wolfgang Wessels. Boulder: Westview.
92. Silvestri, Stefano. (1990) Search for a European Pillar. In NATO in the 5th Decade, edited by Stephen J. Flanagan. Washington, DC: National Defense University Press.
93. Sloan, Stanley R. (1983) Wege zu einem neuen transatlantischen Übereinkommen: Eine Europdäsche Politische Zusammenarbeit (EPZ) als instrument der Konsensbildung. Europa Archiv 38(7):205-214.
94. Sloan, Stanley R. (1985) NATO's Future: Toward a New Transatlantic Bargain. Washington, DC: National Defense University Press.
95. Sloan, Stanley R. (2000) The United States and European Defence. Challiot Papers. Paris: Institute for Security Studies.
96. Smith, Craig S. (2003) Europeans Plan Own Military Command Post. New York Times, September 3.
97. Smith, Julie. (2003) The Future of the European Union and the Transatlantic Relationship. International Affairs 79(5):943-949.
98. Snyder, Glenn H. (1984) The Security Dilemma in Alliance Politics. World Politics 36(4):461-495.
99. Staden, Alfred von. (1994) After Maastricht: Explaining the Movement towards a Common European Defence Policy. In European Foreign Policy: The EC and Changing Perspectives in Europe, edited by Steve Smith. London: Sage.
100. Steinberg, James B. (1986) Rethinking the Debate on Burden-Sharing. Survival 28(1):56-78.
101. Steinberg, James B. (2001) An Elective Partnership: Salving Transatlantic Relations. Survival 45(2):113-146.
102. Talbott, Strobe. (1999a) America's Stake in a Strong Europe. Conference on the Future of NATO, Royal Institute of International Affairs, London, October 7.
103. Talbott, Strobe. (1999b) The New Europe and the New NATO. Address to the German Society for Foreign Policy, Bonn, Germany, February 4. Available at http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/newnato.htm. (Accessed February 28, 2004)
104. Thränert, Oliver. (2002) Zwischen Hoffinungen und Befü rchtungen: Die USA und die europäische Sicherheits- und Verteidigungspolitik. In Die Europäische Sicherheits- und Verteidigungspolitik. Positionen, Perzeptionen, Probleme, Perspektiven, edited by Hans Georg Ehrhart. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
105. Tyler, Patrick E. (1992) Senior US Officials Assail Lone-Superpower Policy. New York Times. March 11. Excerpts from the draft document are available at http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/iraq/etc/wolf.html. (Accessed on February 27, 2004)
106. Van Ham, Peter. (2000) Europe's Common Defense Policy: Implications for the Trans-Atlantic Relationship. Security Dialogue 31(2):215-228.
107. Van Ham, Peter. (2001) Security and Culture, or, Why NATO Won't Last (Editor's Comments). Security Dialogue 32(4):387-392.
108. Van Ham, Peter. (2002) A European View of the US and ESDP In The EUs Search for a Strategic Role, edited by Esther Brimmer. Washington, DC: Center for Transatlantic Relations.
109. Wallace, William. (2001) Europe, the Necessary Partner. Foreign Affairs 80(3):16-34.
110. Weiland, Severin. (2002) Zustimmen, einbinden, verzögern. Der Spiegel, November 14. Available at http://www.spiegel.de/poliik/deutschland/0,1518,222847,00.html. (Accessed December 17, 2002)
111. Weinberger, Casper. (1988) US Department of Defense: Discriminant Deterrence. Report of the Commission on Integrated Long-Term Strategy Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.
112. Wernike, Christian. (2003) Amerikas Argwohn: Europa ringt um die Verteidigungspolitik, die USA mischen mit. Sueddeutsche Zeitung, October 23.
113. Whitman, Richard G. (1999) Amsterdam's Unfinished Business? The Blair Government's Initiative and the Future of the Western European Union. Western European Union Occasional Papers. Paris: Institute for Security Studies.
114. Williams, Phil. (1984) The United States' Commitment to Western Europe: Strategic Ambiguity and Political Disintegration. International Affairs 59(2):195-209.
115. Williams, Phil. (1985) The Nunn Amendment, Burden-Sharing and US Troops in Europe. Survival 27(1):2-10.
116. Yost, David S. (1991) France and West European Defence Identity. Survival 33(4):327-351.
117. Yost, David S. (2001) The NATO Capabilities Gap and the European Union. Survival 42(4):97-128.