Reason, recognition, and internal critique

Inquiry (United Kingdom)

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 479-498

  Kauppinen, Antti ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 11144327289     PISSN: 0020174X     EISSN: 15023923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/002017402320947568     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anderson, Elizabeth 1993. Value in Ethics and Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Anderson, Elizabeth 1996. ‘Reasons, Attitudes, and Values: Replies to Sturgeon and Piper.’ Ethics 106, 538-54.
3. Anderson, Elizabeth 2000. ‘Beyond Homo Economicus: Recent Developments in the Theory of Norms.’ Philosophy and Public Affairs 29, 170-200.
4. Blackburn, Simon 1998. Ruling Passions. A Theory of Practical Reasoning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
5. Brandom, Robert 1994. Making It Explicit. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Brink, David 1988. Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Habermas, Jürgen 1985. Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
8. Habermas, Jürgen 1996. ‘Eine genealogische Betrachtung zum kognitiven Gehalt der Moral’, in Die Einbeziehung des Anderen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
9. Hardimon, Michael O. 1997. Review of The Struggle for Recognition. The Journal of Philosophy 94 (1), 46-54.
10. Helm, Bennett 2001. Emotional Reason. Deliberation, Motivation, and the Nature of Value. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Honneth, Axel 1991. The Critique of Power. Reflective Stages in Critical Social Theory. Trans. Kenneth Baynes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Honneth, Axel 1995. The Struggle for Recognition. The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Trans. Joel Anderson. Cambridge: Polity Press.
13. Honneth, Axel 1997. ‘Anerkennung und moralische Verpflichtung. ’ Zeitschrift fiir philosophische Forschung 51 (1), 25-41.
14. Honneth, Axel 1999. ‘Mutual Recognition as a Key for a Universal Ethics. ’ Trans. John M. M. Farrell. On the Internet at http://www.unesco.or.kr/kor/science:s/project/universal_ethics/asianvalues/honneth.htm
15. Honneth, Axel 2000. ‘The Possibility of a Disclosing Critique of Society: The Dialectic of the Enlightenment in Light of Current Debates in Social Criticism.’ Constellations 7 (1).
16. Honneth, Axel 2001a. ‘Invisibility: On the Epistemology of Recognition.’ Trans. Maeve Cooke and Jeff Seitzer. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 75, 111-26.
17. Honneth, Axel 2001b. ‘Reconstructive Social Critique with a Genealogical Reservation: On the Idea of Critique in the Frankfurt School.’ Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 22 (2), 3-12.
18. Horkheimer, Max 1937. ‘Traditionelle und kritische Theorie’, in Kritische Theorie. Band II. Ed. Alfred Schmidt. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer Verlag, pp. 137-91.
19. Korsgaard, Christine 1996. The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Leiter, Brian 2001. ‘Moral Facts and Best Explanations.’ Social Philosophy and Policy 18 (Summer 2001), 79-101.
21. Margalit, Avishai 1996. The Decent Society. Trans Naomi Goldblum. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. McDowell, John 1996. ‘Two Sorts of Naturalism’, reprinted in Mind, Value, and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 167-97.
23. Rawls, John 1996. Political Liberalism. Paperback Edition. New York: Columbia University Press.
24. Rorty, Richard 1991. Objectivity, Realism, and Truth. Philosophical Papers Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Smith, Michael 1995. ‘Internal Reasons.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (1), 109-30.
26. Smith, Robin 1995. ‘Logic’, in The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle, ed. Jonathan Barnes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 27-65.
27. Sturgeon, Nicholas 1988. ‘Moral Explanations,’ in Essays on Moral Realism, ed. Geoffrey Sayre-McCord. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 229-55.
28. Tuomela, Raimo 1995. The Importance of Us. A Philosophical Study of Basic Social Notions. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
29. Velleman, David 1996. ‘The Possibility of Practical Reason.’ Ethics 106, 694-726.
30. Zurn, Christopher 2000. ‘Anthropology and Normativity: a Critique of Axel Honneth’s “Formal Conception of Ethical Life”.’ Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (1), 115-24.