The relationship of Sophora sect. Edwardsia (Fabaceae) to Sophora tomentosa, the type species of the genus Sophora, observed from DNA sequence data and morphological characters

Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 146, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 439-446

  Heenan, P B ^a   Dawson, M I ^a   Wagstaff, S J ^a  

^a LANDCARE RESEARCH   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

ITS; New Zealand flora; Phylogeny; rbcL

Indexed keywords

PHYLOGENETICS;

EDWARDSIA; FABACEAE; SOPHORA; SOPHORA TOMENTOSA;

EID: 11144251225     PISSN: 00244074     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2004.00348.x     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. van der Bank M, Chase MW, van Wyk B, Fay MF, van der Bank FH, Reeves G, Hulme A. 2002. Systematics of the tribe Podalyrieae (Fabaceae) based on DNA, morphological and chemical data. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 139: 159-170.
2. Cadet T. 1986. Fleurs et Plantes de la Réunion et de I'ile Maurice. Singapore: Times Editions.
3. Chock AK. 1956. A taxonomic revision of the Hawaiian species of the genus Sophora Linnaeus (Family Leguminosae). Pacific Science 10: 136-158.
4. de Cordemoy EJ. 1893. Flore L'ile de la Réunion. Paris: Paul Klincksieck.
5. Crisp MD, Gilmore S, Van Wyk B. 2000. Molecular phylogeny of the Genistoid tribes of papilionoid legumes. In: Herendeen PS, Bruneau A, eds. Advances in legume systematics: Part 9. London: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 249-276.
6. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemistry Bulletin 19: 11-15.
7. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL, Ballenger JA, Dickson EE, Kajita T, Ohashi H. 1997. A phylogeny of the chloroplast gene rbcL in the Leguminosae: Taxonomic correlations and insights into the evolution of nodulation. American Journal of Botany 84: 541-554.
8. Farris JS, Källersjö M, Kuge AG, Bult C. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.
9. Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
10. Green PS. 1994. Flora of Australia 49, oceanic islands I. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
11. Guppy HB. 1906. Observations of a naturalist in the Pacific between 1896 and 1899, Vol. II. Plant dispersal. London: Macmillan.
12. Heenan PB, deLange PJ, Wilton AD. 2001. Sophora (Fabaceae) in New Zealand: taxonomy, distribution, and biogeography. New Zealand Journal of Botany 39: 17-53.
13. Hillis DM. 1991. Discriminating between phylogenetic signal and random noise in DNA sequences. In: Miyamoto M, Cracraft MJ, eds. Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 278-294.
14. Kajita T, Ohashi H, Tateishi Y, Bailey CD, Doyle JJ. 2001. rbcL and legume phylogeny, with particular reference to Phaseoleae, Millettieae, and allies. Systematic Botany 26: 515-536.
15. Käss E, Wink M. 1995. Molecular phylogeny of the Papilionoideae (family Leguminosae): rbcL gene sequences versus chemical taxonomy. Botanica Acta 108: 149-162.
16. Käss E, Wink M. 1996. Molecular evolution of the Leguminosae: phylogeny of the three subfamilies based on rbcL-sequences. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 24: 365-378.
17. Lavin M, Pennington RT, Klitgaard BB, Sprent JI, de Lima HC, Gasson PE. 2001. The dalbergioid legumes (Fabaceae): delimitation of a pantropical monophyletic clade. American Journal of Botany 88: 503-533.
18. Mitchell AD, Heenan PB. 2002. Sophora sect. Edwardsia: further evidence from nrDNA sequence data of a recent and rapid radiation around the Southern Oceans. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 140: 435-441.
19. Molloy BPJ. 2002. Origin of Sophora chathamica (Fabaceae) on Chatham Island. Canterbury Botanical Society Journal 36: 37-45.
20. Oliver WRB. 1921. Notes on specimens of New Zealand ferns and flowering plants in London herbaria. Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute 53: 362-365.
21. Olmstead RG, Michaels HJ, Scott KM, Palmer JB. 1992. Monophyly of the Asteridae and identification of their major lineages inferred from DNA sequences of rbcL. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79: 249-265.
22. Pasada D, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
23. Peña RC, Cassels BK. 1996. Phylogenetic relationships among Chilean Sophora species. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 24: 725-733.
24. Peña RC, Iturriaga L, Montenegro G, Cassels BK. 2000. Phylogenetic and biogeographic aspects of Sophora sect. Edwardsia (Papilionaceae). Pacific Science 54: 159-167.
25. Pennington RT, Lavin M, Ireland H, Klitgaard B, Preston J, Hu J. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships of basal Papilionoid legumes based upon sequences of the chloroplast trnL intron. Systematic Botany 26: 537-556.
26. Percy DM, Cronk QCB. 2002. Different fates of island brooms: contrasting evolution in Adenocarpus, Genista and Teline (Genisteae, Fabaceae) in the Canary Islands and Madeira. American Journal of Botany 89: 854-864.
27. Pizarro CM. 1959. Sinopsis de la Flora Chilena. Santiago: Universidad de Chile.
28. Polhill RM. 1976. Genisteae (Adans.) Benth. & related tribes (Leguminosae). Botanical Systematics 1: 143-368.
29. Polhill RM. 1981. Papilionoideae. In: Polhill RM, Raven PH, eds. Advances in legume systematics I. London: Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew, 191-208.
30. Polhill RM. 1994. Classification of the Leguminosae. In: Southon IW, ed. Phytochemical dictionary of the Leguminosae 1. London: Chapman & Hall, xxxv-lvii.
31. Ramírez C, Romero M. 1978. El Pacifico como agente diseminante en el litoral chileno. Ecologia 3: 19-30.
32. Ridley HN. 1930. The dispersal of plants throughout the world. Kent: Reeve.
33. Ruiz E, Donoso C, Gonzalez F, Becerra J, Marticorena C, Silva M. 1999. Phenetic relationships between Juan Fernandez and continental Chilean species of Sophora (Fabaceae) based on flavonoid patterns. Boletin de la Sociedad Chilena de Quimica 44: 351-356.
34. Salisbury RA. 1808. Some remarks on the plants now referred to Sophora, with characters of the genus Edwardsia. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 9: 296-300.
35. Sousa M, Rudd VE. 1993. Revision del genero Styphnolobium (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: Sophoreae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 270-283.
36. St John H. 1985. Sophora (Leguminosae) in Southeastern Polynesia. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik 106: 115-122.
37. Swofford DL. 1998. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4.0b10. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
38. Sykes WR, Godley EJ. 1968. Transoceanic dispersal in Sophora and other genera. Nature 218: 495-496.
39. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. 1997. The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 24: 4876-4882.
40. Tsoong P, Ma C. 1981. A study on the genus Sophora Linn. (cont.). Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 19: 143-167.
41. Wace NM, Dickson JH. 1965. The terrestrial botany of the Tristan da Cunha Islands. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B 249: 273-360.
42. Wagner WL, Herbst DE, Sohmer SH. 1990. Manual of the flowering plants of Hawai'i, 1. Bishop Museum Special Publication 83, 1-988.
43. Wagstaff SJ, Garnock-Jones PJ. 1998. Evolution and biogeography of the Hebe complex (Scrophulariaceae) inferred from ITS sequences. New Zealand Journal of Botany 36: 425-437.
44. van Wyk B, Schutte AL. 1995. Phylogenetic relationships in the tribes Podalyrieae, Liparieae and Crotalarieae. In: Crisp M, Doyle JJ, eds. Advances in legume systematics 7: phylogeny. London: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 283-308.
45. Yakovlev GP. 1967. Systematical and geographical studies of the genus Sophora L. & allied genera. Trudy Leningradskogo Khimiko - Farmatsevticheskogo Instituta 21: 42-62.